Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST)

Eliezer Yudkowsky and Stephen Wolfram discuss artificial intelligence and its potential existen‑

tial risks. They traversed fundamental questions about AI safety, consciousness, computational irreducibility, and the nature of intelligence.

The discourse centered on Yudkowsky’s argument that advanced AI systems pose an existential threat to humanity, primarily due to the challenge of alignment and the potential for emergent goals that diverge from human values. Wolfram, while acknowledging potential risks, approached the topic from a his signature measured perspective, emphasizing the importance of understanding computational systems’ fundamental nature and questioning whether AI systems would necessarily develop the kind of goal‑directed behavior Yudkowsky fears.

***

MLST IS SPONSORED BY TUFA AI LABS!

The current winners of the ARC challenge, MindsAI are part of Tufa AI Labs. They are hiring ML engineers. Are you interested?! Please goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TOC:

1. Foundational AI Concepts and Risks

[00:00:01] 1.1 AI Optimization and System Capabilities Debate

[00:06:46] 1.2 Computational Irreducibility and Intelligence Limitations

[00:20:09] 1.3 Existential Risk and Species Succession

[00:23:28] 1.4 Consciousness and Value Preservation in AI Systems

2. Ethics and Philosophy in AI

[00:33:24] 2.1 Moral Value of Human Consciousness vs. Computation

[00:36:30] 2.2 Ethics and Moral Philosophy Debate

[00:39:58] 2.3 Existential Risks and Digital Immortality

[00:43:30] 2.4 Consciousness and Personal Identity in Brain Emulation

3. Truth and Logic in AI Systems

[00:54:39] 3.1 AI Persuasion Ethics and Truth

[01:01:48] 3.2 Mathematical Truth and Logic in AI Systems

[01:11:29] 3.3 Universal Truth vs Personal Interpretation in Ethics and Mathematics

[01:14:43] 3.4 Quantum Mechanics and Fundamental Reality Debate

4. AI Capabilities and Constraints

[01:21:21] 4.1 AI Perception and Physical Laws

[01:28:33] 4.2 AI Capabilities and Computational Constraints

[01:34:59] 4.3 AI Motivation and Anthropomorphization Debate

[01:38:09] 4.4 Prediction vs Agency in AI Systems

5. AI System Architecture and Behavior

[01:44:47] 5.1 Computational Irreducibility and Probabilistic Prediction

[01:48:10] 5.2 Teleological vs Mechanistic Explanations of AI Behavior

[02:09:41] 5.3 Machine Learning as Assembly of Computational Components

[02:29:52] 5.4 AI Safety and Predictability in Complex Systems

6. Goal Optimization and Alignment

[02:50:30] 6.1 Goal Specification and Optimization Challenges in AI Systems

[02:58:31] 6.2 Intelligence, Computation, and Goal-Directed Behavior

[03:02:18] 6.3 Optimization Goals and Human Existential Risk

[03:08:49] 6.4 Emergent Goals and AI Alignment Challenges

7. AI Evolution and Risk Assessment

[03:19:44] 7.1 Inner Optimization and Mesa-Optimization Theory

[03:34:00] 7.2 Dynamic AI Goals and Extinction Risk Debate

[03:56:05] 7.3 AI Risk and Biological System Analogies

[04:09:37] 7.4 Expert Risk Assessments and Optimism vs Reality

8. Future Implications and Economics

[04:13:01] 8.1 Economic and Proliferation Considerations

SHOWNOTES (transcription, references, summary, best quotes etc):

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3st8dts2ba7yob161dchd/EliezerWolfram.pdf?rlkey=b6va5j8upgqwl9s2muc924vtt&st=vemwqx7a&dl=0

Francois Chollet, a prominent AI expert and creator of ARC-AGI, discusses intelligence, consciousness, and artificial intelligence.

Chollet explains that real intelligence isn't about memorizing information or having lots of knowledge - it's about being able to handle new situations effectively. This is why he believes current large language models (LLMs) have "near-zero intelligence" despite their impressive abilities. They're more like sophisticated memory and pattern-matching systems than truly intelligent beings.

***

MLST IS SPONSORED BY TUFA AI LABS!

The current winners of the ARC challenge, MindsAI are part of Tufa AI Labs. They are hiring ML engineers. Are you interested?! Please goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

He introduced his "Kaleidoscope Hypothesis," which suggests that while the world seems infinitely complex, it's actually made up of simpler patterns that repeat and combine in different ways. True intelligence, he argues, involves identifying these basic patterns and using them to understand new situations.

Chollet also talked about consciousness, suggesting it develops gradually in children rather than appearing all at once. He believes consciousness exists in degrees - animals have it to some extent, and even human consciousness varies with age and circumstances (like being more conscious when learning something new versus doing routine tasks).

On AI safety, Chollet takes a notably different stance from many in Silicon Valley. He views AGI development as a scientific challenge rather than a religious quest, and doesn't share the apocalyptic concerns of some AI researchers. He argues that intelligence itself isn't dangerous - it's just a tool for turning information into useful models. What matters is how we choose to use it.

ARC-AGI Prize:

https://arcprize.org/

Francois Chollet:

https://x.com/fchollet

Shownotes:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/j2068j3hlj8br96pfa7bi/CHOLLET_FINAL.pdf?rlkey=xkbr7tbnrjdl66m246w26uc8k&st=0a4ec4na&dl=0

TOC:

1. Intelligence and Model Building

[00:00:00] 1.1 Intelligence Definition and ARC Benchmark

[00:05:40] 1.2 LLMs as Program Memorization Systems

[00:09:36] 1.3 Kaleidoscope Hypothesis and Abstract Building Blocks

[00:13:39] 1.4 Deep Learning Limitations and System 2 Reasoning

[00:29:38] 1.5 Intelligence vs. Skill in LLMs and Model Building

2. ARC Benchmark and Program Synthesis

[00:37:36] 2.1 Intelligence Definition and LLM Limitations

[00:41:33] 2.2 Meta-Learning System Architecture

[00:56:21] 2.3 Program Search and Occam's Razor

[00:59:42] 2.4 Developer-Aware Generalization

[01:06:49] 2.5 Task Generation and Benchmark Design

3. Cognitive Systems and Program Generation

[01:14:38] 3.1 System 1/2 Thinking Fundamentals

[01:22:17] 3.2 Program Synthesis and Combinatorial Challenges

[01:31:18] 3.3 Test-Time Fine-Tuning Strategies

[01:36:10] 3.4 Evaluation and Leakage Problems

[01:43:22] 3.5 ARC Implementation Approaches

4. Intelligence and Language Systems

[01:50:06] 4.1 Intelligence as Tool vs Agent

[01:53:53] 4.2 Cultural Knowledge Integration

[01:58:42] 4.3 Language and Abstraction Generation

[02:02:41] 4.4 Embodiment in Cognitive Systems

[02:09:02] 4.5 Language as Cognitive Operating System

5. Consciousness and AI Safety

[02:14:05] 5.1 Consciousness and Intelligence Relationship

[02:20:25] 5.2 Development of Machine Consciousness

[02:28:40] 5.3 Consciousness Prerequisites and Indicators

[02:36:36] 5.4 AGI Safety Considerations

[02:40:29] 5.5 AI Regulation Framework

Anil Ananthaswamy is an award-winning science writer and former staff writer and deputy news editor for the London-based New Scientist magazine.

Machine learning systems are making life-altering decisions for us: approving mortgage loans, determining whether a tumor is cancerous, or deciding if someone gets bail. They now influence developments and discoveries in chemistry, biology, and physics—the study of genomes, extrasolar planets, even the intricacies of quantum systems. And all this before large language models such as ChatGPT came on the scene.

We are living through a revolution in machine learning-powered AI that shows no signs of slowing down. This technology is based on relatively simple mathematical ideas, some of which go back centuries, including linear algebra and calculus, the stuff of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century mathematics. It took the birth and advancement of computer science and the kindling of 1990s computer chips designed for video games to ignite the explosion of AI that we see today. In this enlightening book, Anil Ananthaswamy explains the fundamental math behind machine learning, while suggesting intriguing links between artificial and natural intelligence. Might the same math underpin them both?

As Ananthaswamy resonantly concludes, to make safe and effective use of artificial intelligence, we need to understand its profound capabilities and limitations, the clues to which lie in the math that makes machine learning possible.

Why Machines Learn: The Elegant Math Behind Modern AI:

https://amzn.to/3UAWX3D

https://anilananthaswamy.com/

Sponsor message:

DO YOU WANT WORK ON ARC with the MindsAI team (current ARC winners)?

Interested? Apply for an ML research position: benjamin@tufa.ai

Shownotes:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wpv22m5jxyiqr6pqfkzwz/anil.pdf?rlkey=9c233jo5armr548ctwo419n6p&st=xzhahtje&dl=0

Chapters:

1. ML Fundamentals and Prerequisites

[00:00:00] 1.1 Differences Between Human and Machine Learning

[00:00:35] 1.2 Mathematical Prerequisites and Societal Impact of ML

[00:02:20] 1.3 Author's Journey and Book Background

[00:11:30] 1.4 Mathematical Foundations and Core ML Concepts

[00:21:45] 1.5 Bias-Variance Tradeoff and Modern Deep Learning

2. Deep Learning Architecture

[00:29:05] 2.1 Double Descent and Overparameterization in Deep Learning

[00:32:40] 2.2 Mathematical Foundations and Self-Supervised Learning

[00:40:05] 2.3 High-Dimensional Spaces and Model Architecture

[00:52:55] 2.4 Historical Development of Backpropagation

3. AI Understanding and Limitations

[00:59:13] 3.1 Pattern Matching vs Human Reasoning in ML Models

[01:00:20] 3.2 Mathematical Foundations and Pattern Recognition in AI

[01:04:08] 3.3 LLM Reliability and Machine Understanding Debate

[01:12:50] 3.4 Historical Development of Deep Learning Technologies

[01:15:21] 3.5 Alternative AI Approaches and Bio-inspired Methods

4. Ethical and Neurological Perspectives

[01:24:32] 4.1 Neural Network Scaling and Mathematical Limitations

[01:31:12] 4.2 AI Ethics and Societal Impact

[01:38:30] 4.3 Consciousness and Neurological Conditions

[01:46:17] 4.4 Body Ownership and Agency in Neuroscience

Professor Michael Levin explores the revolutionary concept of diverse intelligence, demonstrating how cognitive capabilities extend far beyond traditional brain-based intelligence. Drawing from his groundbreaking research, he explains how even simple biological systems like gene regulatory networks exhibit learning, memory, and problem-solving abilities. Levin introduces key concepts like "cognitive light cones" - the scope of goals a system can pursue - and shows how these ideas are transforming our approach to cancer treatment and biological engineering. His insights challenge conventional views of intelligence and agency, with profound implications for both medicine and artificial intelligence development. This deep discussion reveals how understanding intelligence as a spectrum, from molecular networks to human minds, could be crucial for humanity's future technological development. Contains technical discussion of biological systems, cybernetics, and theoretical frameworks for understanding emergent cognition.

Prof. Michael Levin

https://as.tufts.edu/biology/people/faculty/michael-levin

https://x.com/drmichaellevin

Sponsor message:

DO YOU WANT WORK ON ARC with the MindsAI team (current ARC winners)?

Interested? Apply for an ML research position: benjamin@tufa.ai

TOC

1. Intelligence Fundamentals and Evolution

[00:00:00] 1.1 Future Evolution of Human Intelligence and Consciousness

[00:03:00] 1.2 Science Fiction's Role in Exploring Intelligence Possibilities

[00:08:15] 1.3 Essential Characteristics of Human-Level Intelligence and Relationships

[00:14:20] 1.4 Biological Systems Architecture and Intelligence

2. Biological Computing and Cognition

[00:24:00] 2.1 Agency and Intelligence in Biological Systems

[00:30:30] 2.2 Learning Capabilities in Gene Regulatory Networks

[00:35:37] 2.3 Biological Control Systems and Competency Architecture

[00:39:58] 2.4 Scientific Metaphors and Polycomputing Paradigm

3. Systems and Collective Intelligence

[00:43:26] 3.1 Embodiment and Problem-Solving Spaces

[00:44:50] 3.2 Perception-Action Loops and Biological Intelligence

[00:46:55] 3.3 Intelligence, Wisdom and Collective Systems

[00:53:07] 3.4 Cancer and Cognitive Light Cones

[00:57:09] 3.5 Emergent Intelligence and AI Agency

Shownotes:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i2vl1vs009thg54lxx5wc/LEVIN.pdf?rlkey=dtk8okhbsejryiu2vrht19qp6&st=uzi0vo45&dl=0

REFS:

[0:05:30] A Fire Upon the Deep - Vernor Vinge sci-fi novel on AI and consciousness

[0:05:35] Maria Chudnovsky - MacArthur Fellow, Princeton mathematician, graph theory expert

[0:14:20] Bow-tie architecture in biological systems - Network structure research by Csete & Doyle

[0:15:40] Richard Watson - Southampton Professor, evolution and learning systems expert

[0:17:00] Levin paper on human issues in AI and evolution

[0:19:00] Bow-tie architecture in Darwin's agential materialism - Levin

[0:22:55] Philip Goff - Work on panpsychism and consciousness in Galileo's Error

[0:23:30] Strange Loop - Hofstadter's work on self-reference and consciousness

[0:25:00] The Hard Problem of Consciousness - Van Gulick

[0:26:15] Daniel Dennett - Theories on consciousness and intentional systems

[0:29:35] Principle of Least Action - Light path selection in physics

[0:29:50] Free Energy Principle - Friston's unified behavioral framework

[0:30:35] Gene regulatory networks - Learning capabilities in biological systems

[0:36:55] Minimal networks with learning capacity - Levin

[0:38:50] Multi-scale competency in biological systems - Levin

[0:41:40] Polycomputing paradigm - Biological computation by Bongard & Levin

[0:45:40] Collective intelligence in biology - Levin et al.

[0:46:55] Niche construction and stigmergy - Torday

[0:53:50] Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumor Disease - Transmissible cancer research

[0:55:05] Cognitive light cone - Computational boundaries of self - Levin

[0:58:05] Cognitive properties in sorting algorithms - Zhang, Goldstein & Levin

Will Williams is CTO of Speechmatics in Cambridge. In this sponsored episode - he shares deep technical insights into modern speech recognition technology and system architecture. The episode covers several key technical areas:

* Speechmatics' hybrid approach to ASR, which focusses on unsupervised learning methods, achieving comparable results with 100x less data than fully supervised approaches. Williams explains why this is more efficient and generalizable than end-to-end models like Whisper.

* Their production architecture implementing multiple operating points for different latency-accuracy trade-offs, with careful latency padding (up to 1.8 seconds) to ensure consistent user experience. The system uses lattice-based decoding with language model integration for improved accuracy.

* The challenges and solutions in real-time ASR, including their approach to diarization (speaker identification), handling cross-talk, and implicit source separation. Williams explains why these problems remain difficult even with modern deep learning approaches.

* Their testing and deployment infrastructure, including the use of mirrored environments for catching edge cases in production, and their strategy of maintaining global models rather than allowing customer-specific fine-tuning.

* Technical evolution in ASR, from early days of custom CUDA kernels and manual memory management to modern frameworks, with Williams offering interesting critiques of current PyTorch memory management approaches and arguing for more efficient direct memory allocation in production systems.

Get coding with their API! This is their URL:

https://www.speechmatics.com/

DO YOU WANT WORK ON ARC with the MindsAI team (current ARC winners)?

MLST is sponsored by Tufa Labs:

Focus: ARC, LLMs, test-time-compute, active inference, system2 reasoning, and more.

Interested? Apply for an ML research position: benjamin@tufa.ai

TOC

1. ASR Core Technology & Real-time Architecture

[00:00:00] 1.1 ASR and Diarization Fundamentals

[00:05:25] 1.2 Real-time Conversational AI Architecture

[00:09:21] 1.3 Neural Network Streaming Implementation

[00:12:49] 1.4 Multi-modal System Integration

2. Production System Optimization

[00:29:38] 2.1 Production Deployment and Testing Infrastructure

[00:35:40] 2.2 Model Architecture and Deployment Strategy

[00:37:12] 2.3 Latency-Accuracy Trade-offs

[00:39:15] 2.4 Language Model Integration

[00:40:32] 2.5 Lattice-based Decoding Architecture

3. Performance Evaluation & Ethical Considerations

[00:44:00] 3.1 ASR Performance Metrics and Capabilities

[00:46:35] 3.2 AI Regulation and Evaluation Methods

[00:51:09] 3.3 Benchmark and Testing Challenges

[00:54:30] 3.4 Real-world Implementation Metrics

[01:00:51] 3.5 Ethics and Privacy Considerations

4. ASR Technical Evolution

[01:09:00] 4.1 WER Calculation and Evaluation Methodologies

[01:10:21] 4.2 Supervised vs Self-Supervised Learning Approaches

[01:21:02] 4.3 Temporal Learning and Feature Processing

[01:24:45] 4.4 Feature Engineering to Automated ML

5. Enterprise Implementation & Scale

[01:27:55] 5.1 Future AI Systems and Adaptation

[01:31:52] 5.2 Technical Foundations and History

[01:34:53] 5.3 Infrastructure and Team Scaling

[01:38:05] 5.4 Research and Talent Strategy

[01:41:11] 5.5 Engineering Practice Evolution

Shownotes:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d94b1jcgph9o8au8shdym/Speechmatics.pdf?rlkey=bi55wvktzomzx0y5sic6jz99y&st=6qwofv8t&dl=0

Dr. Sanjeev Namjoshi, a machine learning engineer who recently submitted a book on Active Inference to MIT Press, discusses the theoretical foundations and practical applications of Active Inference, the Free Energy Principle (FEP), and Bayesian mechanics. He explains how these frameworks describe how biological and artificial systems maintain stability by minimizing uncertainty about their environment.

DO YOU WANT WORK ON ARC with the MindsAI team (current ARC winners)?

MLST is sponsored by Tufa Labs:

Focus: ARC, LLMs, test-time-compute, active inference, system2 reasoning, and more.

Future plans: Expanding to complex environments like Warcraft 2 and Starcraft 2.

Interested? Apply for an ML research position: benjamin@tufa.ai

Namjoshi traces the evolution of these fields from early 2000s neuroscience research to current developments, highlighting how Active Inference provides a unified framework for perception and action through variational free energy minimization. He contrasts this with traditional machine learning approaches, emphasizing Active Inference's natural capacity for exploration and curiosity through epistemic value.

He sees Active Inference as being at a similar stage to deep learning in the early 2000s - poised for significant breakthroughs but requiring better tools and wider adoption. While acknowledging current computational challenges, he emphasizes Active Inference's potential advantages over reinforcement learning, particularly its principled approach to exploration and planning.

Dr. Sanjeev Namjoshi

https://snamjoshi.github.io/

TOC:

1. Theoretical Foundations: AI Agency and Sentience

[00:00:00] 1.1 Intro

[00:02:45] 1.2 Free Energy Principle and Active Inference Theory

[00:11:16] 1.3 Emergence and Self-Organization in Complex Systems

[00:19:11] 1.4 Agency and Representation in AI Systems

[00:29:59] 1.5 Bayesian Mechanics and Systems Modeling

2. Technical Framework: Active Inference and Free Energy

[00:38:37] 2.1 Generative Processes and Agent-Environment Modeling

[00:42:27] 2.2 Markov Blankets and System Boundaries

[00:44:30] 2.3 Bayesian Inference and Prior Distributions

[00:52:41] 2.4 Variational Free Energy Minimization Framework

[00:55:07] 2.5 VFE Optimization Techniques: Generalized Filtering vs DEM

3. Implementation and Optimization Methods

[00:58:25] 3.1 Information Theory and Free Energy Concepts

[01:05:25] 3.2 Surprise Minimization and Action in Active Inference

[01:15:58] 3.3 Evolution of Active Inference Models: Continuous to Discrete Approaches

[01:26:00] 3.4 Uncertainty Reduction and Control Systems in Active Inference

4. Safety and Regulatory Frameworks

[01:32:40] 4.1 Historical Evolution of Risk Management and Predictive Systems

[01:36:12] 4.2 Agency and Reality: Philosophical Perspectives on Models

[01:39:20] 4.3 Limitations of Symbolic AI and Current System Design

[01:46:40] 4.4 AI Safety Regulation and Corporate Governance

5. Socioeconomic Integration and Modeling

[01:52:55] 5.1 Economic Policy and Public Sentiment Modeling

[01:55:21] 5.2 Free Energy Principle: Libertarian vs Collectivist Perspectives

[01:58:53] 5.3 Regulation of Complex Socio-Technical Systems

[02:03:04] 5.4 Evolution and Current State of Active Inference Research

6. Future Directions and Applications

[02:14:26] 6.1 Active Inference Applications and Future Development

[02:22:58] 6.2 Cultural Learning and Active Inference

[02:29:19] 6.3 Hierarchical Relationship Between FEP, Active Inference, and Bayesian Mechanics

[02:33:22] 6.4 Historical Evolution of Free Energy Principle

[02:38:52] 6.5 Active Inference vs Traditional Machine Learning Approaches

Transcript and shownotes with refs and URLs:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/qj22a660cob1795ej0gbw/SanjeevShow.pdf?rlkey=w323r3e8zfsnve22caayzb17k&st=el1fdgfr&dl=0

Dr. Joscha Bach discusses advanced AI, consciousness, and cognitive modeling. He presents consciousness as a virtual property emerging from self-organizing software patterns, challenging panpsychism and materialism. Bach introduces "Cyberanima," reinterpreting animism through information processing, viewing spirits as self-organizing software agents.

He addresses limitations of current large language models and advocates for smaller, more efficient AI models capable of reasoning from first principles. Bach describes his work with Liquid AI on novel neural network architectures for improved expressiveness and efficiency.

The interview covers AI's societal implications, including regulation challenges and impact on innovation. Bach argues for balancing oversight with technological progress, warning against overly restrictive regulations.

Throughout, Bach frames consciousness, intelligence, and agency as emergent properties of complex information processing systems, proposing a computational framework for cognitive phenomena and reality.

SPONSOR MESSAGE:

DO YOU WANT WORK ON ARC with the MindsAI team (current ARC winners)? MLST is sponsored by Tufa Labs: Focus: ARC, LLMs, test-time-compute, active inference, system2 reasoning, and more. Future plans: Expanding to complex environments like Warcraft 2 and Starcraft 2. Interested? Apply for an ML research position: benjamin@tufa.ai

TOC

[00:00:00] 1.1 Consciousness and Intelligence in AI Development

[00:07:44] 1.2 Agency, Intelligence, and Their Relationship to Physical Reality

[00:13:36] 1.3 Virtual Patterns and Causal Structures in Consciousness

[00:25:49] 1.4 Reinterpreting Concepts of God and Animism in Information Processing Terms

[00:32:50] 1.5 Animism and Evolution as Competition Between Software Agents

2. Self-Organizing Systems and Cognitive Models in AI

[00:37:59] 2.1 Consciousness as self-organizing software

[00:45:49] 2.2 Critique of panpsychism and alternative views on consciousness

[00:50:48] 2.3 Emergence of consciousness in complex systems

[00:52:50] 2.4 Neuronal motivation and the origins of consciousness

[00:56:47] 2.5 Coherence and Self-Organization in AI Systems

3. Advanced AI Architectures and Cognitive Processes

[00:57:50] 3.1 Second-Order Software and Complex Mental Processes

[01:01:05] 3.2 Collective Agency and Shared Values in AI

[01:05:40] 3.3 Limitations of Current AI Agents and LLMs

[01:06:40] 3.4 Liquid AI and Novel Neural Network Architectures

[01:10:06] 3.5 AI Model Efficiency and Future Directions

[01:19:00] 3.6 LLM Limitations and Internal State Representation

4. AI Regulation and Societal Impact

[01:31:23] 4.1 AI Regulation and Societal Impact

[01:49:50] 4.2 Open-Source AI and Industry Challenges

Refs in shownotes and MP3 metadata

Shownotes:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/g28dosz19bzcfs5imrvbu/JoschaInterview.pdf?rlkey=s3y18jy192ktz6ogd7qtvry3d&st=10z7q7w9&dl=0

Alessandro Palmarini is a post-baccalaureate researcher at the Santa Fe Institute working under the supervision of Melanie Mitchell. He completed his undergraduate degree in Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science at the University of Edinburgh. Palmarini's current research focuses on developing AI systems that can efficiently acquire new skills from limited data, inspired by François Chollet's work on measuring intelligence. His work builds upon the DreamCoder program synthesis system, introducing a novel approach called "dream decompiling" to improve library learning in inductive program synthesis. Palmarini is particularly interested in addressing the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) challenge, aiming to create AI systems that can perform abstract reasoning tasks more efficiently than current approaches. His research explores the balance between computational efficiency and data efficiency in AI learning processes.

DO YOU WANT WORK ON ARC with the MindsAI team (current ARC winners)? MLST is sponsored by Tufa Labs: Focus: ARC, LLMs, test-time-compute, active inference, system2 reasoning, and more. Future plans: Expanding to complex environments like Warcraft 2 and Starcraft 2. Interested? Apply for an ML research position: benjamin@tufa.ai

TOC:

1. Intelligence Measurement in AI Systems

[00:00:00] 1.1 Defining Intelligence in AI Systems

[00:02:00] 1.2 Research at Santa Fe Institute

[00:04:35] 1.3 Impact of Gaming on AI Development

[00:05:10] 1.4 Comparing AI and Human Learning Efficiency

2. Efficient Skill Acquisition in AI

[00:06:40] 2.1 Intelligence as Skill Acquisition Efficiency

[00:08:25] 2.2 Limitations of Current AI Systems in Generalization

[00:09:45] 2.3 Human vs. AI Cognitive Processes

[00:10:40] 2.4 Measuring AI Intelligence: Chollet's ARC Challenge

3. Program Synthesis and ARC Challenge

[00:12:55] 3.1 Philosophical Foundations of Program Synthesis

[00:17:14] 3.2 Introduction to Program Induction and ARC Tasks

[00:18:49] 3.3 DreamCoder: Principles and Techniques

[00:27:55] 3.4 Trade-offs in Program Synthesis Search Strategies

[00:31:52] 3.5 Neural Networks and Bayesian Program Learning

4. Advanced Program Synthesis Techniques

[00:32:30] 4.1 DreamCoder and Dream Decompiling Approach

[00:39:00] 4.2 Beta Distribution and Caching in Program Synthesis

[00:45:10] 4.3 Performance and Limitations of Dream Decompiling

[00:47:45] 4.4 Alessandro's Approach to ARC Challenge

[00:51:12] 4.5 Conclusion and Future Discussions

Refs:

Full reflist on YT VD, Show Notes and MP3 metadata

Show Notes: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/x50201tgqucj5ba2q4typ/Ale.pdf?rlkey=0ubvk7p5gtyx1gpownpdadim8&st=5pniu3nq&dl=0

François Chollet discusses the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) and proposes a new approach to advancing artificial intelligence. He argues that current AI systems excel at pattern recognition but struggle with logical reasoning and true generalization.

This was Chollet's keynote talk at AGI-24, filmed in high-quality. We will be releasing a full interview with him shortly. A teaser clip from that is played in the intro!

Chollet introduces the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) as a benchmark for measuring AI progress towards human-like intelligence. He explains the concept of abstraction in AI systems and proposes combining deep learning with program synthesis to overcome current limitations. Chollet suggests that breakthroughs in AI might come from outside major tech labs and encourages researchers to explore new ideas in the pursuit of artificial general intelligence.

TOC

1. LLM Limitations and Intelligence Concepts

[00:00:00] 1.1 LLM Limitations and Composition

[00:12:05] 1.2 Intelligence as Process vs. Skill

[00:17:15] 1.3 Generalization as Key to AI Progress

2. ARC-AGI Benchmark and LLM Performance

[00:19:59] 2.1 Introduction to ARC-AGI Benchmark

[00:20:05] 2.2 Introduction to ARC-AGI and the ARC Prize

[00:23:35] 2.3 Performance of LLMs and Humans on ARC-AGI

3. Abstraction in AI Systems

[00:26:10] 3.1 The Kaleidoscope Hypothesis and Abstraction Spectrum

[00:30:05] 3.2 LLM Capabilities and Limitations in Abstraction

[00:32:10] 3.3 Value-Centric vs Program-Centric Abstraction

[00:33:25] 3.4 Types of Abstraction in AI Systems

4. Advancing AI: Combining Deep Learning and Program Synthesis

[00:34:05] 4.1 Limitations of Transformers and Need for Program Synthesis

[00:36:45] 4.2 Combining Deep Learning and Program Synthesis

[00:39:59] 4.3 Applying Combined Approaches to ARC Tasks

[00:44:20] 4.4 State-of-the-Art Solutions for ARC

Shownotes (new!): https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i7nsyoahuei6np95lbjxw/CholletKeynote.pdf?rlkey=t3502kbov5exsdxhderq70b9i&st=1ca91ewz&dl=0

[0:01:15] Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC): AI benchmark (François Chollet)

https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547

[0:05:30] Monty Hall problem: Probability puzzle (Steve Selvin)

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.1975.10479121

[0:06:20] LLM training dynamics analysis (Tirumala et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10770

[0:10:20] Transformer limitations on compositionality (Dziri et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18654

[0:10:25] Reversal Curse in LLMs (Berglund et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12288

[0:19:25] Measure of intelligence using algorithmic information theory (François Chollet)

https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547

[0:20:10] ARC-AGI: GitHub repository (François Chollet)

https://github.com/fchollet/ARC-AGI

[0:22:15] ARC Prize: $1,000,000+ competition (François Chollet)

https://arcprize.org/

[0:33:30] System 1 and System 2 thinking (Daniel Kahneman)

https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Fast-Slow-Daniel-Kahneman/dp/0374533555

[0:34:00] Core knowledge in infants (Elizabeth Spelke)

https://www.harvardlds.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SpelkeKinzler07-1.pdf

[0:34:30] Embedding interpretive spaces in ML (Tennenholtz et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04475

[0:44:20] Hypothesis Search with LLMs for ARC (Wang et al.)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05660

[0:44:50] Ryan Greenblatt's high score on ARC public leaderboard

https://arcprize.org/

Ivan Zhang, co-founder of Cohere, discusses the company's enterprise-focused AI solutions. He explains Cohere's early emphasis on embedding technology and training models for secure environments.

Zhang highlights their implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation in healthcare, significantly reducing doctor preparation time. He explores the shift from monolithic AI models to heterogeneous systems and the importance of improving various AI system components. Zhang shares insights on using synthetic data to teach models reasoning, the democratization of software development through AI, and how his gaming skills transfer to running an AI company.

He advises young developers to fully embrace AI technologies and offers perspectives on AI reliability, potential risks, and future model architectures.

https://cohere.com/

https://ivanzhang.ca/

https://x.com/1vnzh

TOC:

00:00:00 Intro

00:03:20 AI & Language Model Evolution

00:06:09 Future AI Apps & Development

00:09:29 Impact on Software Dev Practices

00:13:03 Philosophical & Societal Implications

00:16:30 Compute Efficiency & RAG

00:20:39 Adoption Challenges & Solutions

00:22:30 GPU Optimization & Kubernetes Limits

00:24:16 Cohere's Implementation Approach

00:28:13 Gaming's Professional Influence

00:34:45 Transformer Optimizations

00:36:45 Future Models & System-Level Focus

00:39:20 Inference-Time Computation & Reasoning

00:42:05 Capturing Human Thought in AI

00:43:15 Research, Hiring & Developer Advice

REFS:

00:02:31 Cohere, https://cohere.com/

00:02:40 The Transformer architecture, https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

00:03:22 The Innovator's Dilemma, https://www.amazon.com/Innovators-Dilemma-Technologies-Management-Innovation/dp/1633691780

00:09:15 The actor model, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model

00:14:35 John Searle's Chinese Room Argument, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/

00:18:00 Retrieval-Augmented Generation, https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401

00:18:40 Retrieval-Augmented Generation, https://docs.cohere.com/v2/docs/retrieval-augmented-generation-rag

00:35:39 Let’s Verify Step by Step, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.20050

00:39:20 Adaptive Inference-Time Compute, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02725

00:43:20 Ryan Greenblatt ARC entry, https://redwoodresearch.substack.com/p/getting-50-sota-on-arc-agi-with-gpt

Disclaimer: This show is part of our Cohere partnership series

Prof. Tim Rocktäschel, AI researcher at UCL and Google DeepMind, talks about open-ended AI systems. These systems aim to keep learning and improving on their own, like evolution does in nature.

Ad: Are you a hardcore ML engineer who wants to work for Daniel Cahn at SlingshotAI building AI for mental health? Give him an email! - danielc@slingshot.xyz

TOC:

00:00:00 Introduction to Open-Ended AI and Key Concepts

00:01:37 Tim Rocktäschel's Background and Research Focus

00:06:25 Defining Open-Endedness in AI Systems

00:10:39 Subjective Nature of Interestingness and Learnability

00:16:22 Open-Endedness in Practice: Examples and Limitations

00:17:50 Assessing Novelty in Open-ended AI Systems

00:20:05 Adversarial Attacks and AI Robustness

00:24:05 Rainbow Teaming and LLM Safety

00:25:48 Open-ended Research Approaches in AI

00:29:05 Balancing Long-term Vision and Exploration in AI Research

00:37:25 LLMs in Program Synthesis and Open-Ended Learning

00:37:55 Transition from Human-Based to Novel AI Strategies

00:39:00 Expanding Context Windows and Prompt Evolution

00:40:17 AI Intelligibility and Human-AI Interfaces

00:46:04 Self-Improvement and Evolution in AI Systems

Show notes (New!) https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5avpsyz8jbn4j1az7kevs/TimR.pdf?rlkey=pqjlcqbtm3undp4udtgfmie8n&st=x50u1d1m&dl=0

REFS:

00:01:47 - UCL DARK Lab (Rocktäschel) - AI research lab focusing on RL and open-ended learning - https://ucldark.com/

00:02:31 - GENIE (Bruce) - Generative interactive environment from unlabelled videos - https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15391

00:02:42 - Promptbreeder (Fernando) - Self-referential LLM prompt evolution - https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16797

00:03:05 - Picbreeder (Secretan) - Collaborative online image evolution - https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1357054.1357328

00:03:14 - Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned (Stanley) - Book on open-ended exploration - https://www.amazon.com/Why-Greatness-Cannot-Planned-Objective/dp/3319155237

00:04:36 - NetHack Learning Environment (Küttler) - RL research in procedurally generated game - https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13760

00:07:35 - Open-ended learning (Clune) - AI systems for continual learning and adaptation - https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10985

00:07:35 - OMNI (Zhang) - LLMs modeling human interestingness for exploration - https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01711

00:10:42 - Observer theory (Wolfram) - Computationally bounded observers in complex systems - https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/12/observer-theory/

00:15:25 - Human-Timescale Adaptation (Rocktäschel) - RL agent adapting to novel 3D tasks - https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07608

00:16:15 - Open-Endedness for AGI (Hughes) - Importance of open-ended learning for AGI - https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04268

00:16:35 - POET algorithm (Wang) - Open-ended approach to generate and solve challenges - https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.01753

00:17:20 - AlphaGo (Silver) - AI mastering the game of Go - https://deepmind.google/technologies/alphago/

00:20:35 - Adversarial Go attacks (Dennis) - Exploiting weaknesses in Go AI systems - https://www.ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2024/pdfs/p1630.pdf

00:22:00 - Levels of AGI (Morris) - Framework for categorizing AGI progress - https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02462

00:24:30 - Rainbow Teaming (Samvelyan) - LLM-based adversarial prompt generation - https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16822

00:25:50 - Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned (Stanley) - 'False compass' and 'stepping stone collection' concepts - https://www.amazon.com/Why-Greatness-Cannot-Planned-Objective/dp/3319155237

00:27:45 - AI Debate (Khan) - Improving LLM truthfulness through debate - https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/khan24a.html

00:29:40 - Gemini (Google DeepMind) - Advanced multimodal AI model - https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/

00:30:15 - How to Take Smart Notes (Ahrens) - Effective note-taking methodology - https://www.amazon.com/How-Take-Smart-Notes-Nonfiction/dp/1542866502

(truncated, see shownotes)

Ben Goertzel discusses AGI development, transhumanism, and the potential societal impacts of superintelligent AI. He predicts human-level AGI by 2029 and argues that the transition to superintelligence could happen within a few years after. Goertzel explores the challenges of AI regulation, the limitations of current language models, and the need for neuro-symbolic approaches in AGI research. He also addresses concerns about resource allocation and cultural perspectives on transhumanism.

TOC:

[00:00:00] AGI Timeline Predictions and Development Speed

[00:00:45] Limitations of Language Models in AGI Development

[00:02:18] Current State and Trends in AI Research and Development

[00:09:02] Emergent Reasoning Capabilities and Limitations of LLMs

[00:18:15] Neuro-Symbolic Approaches and the Future of AI Systems

[00:20:00] Evolutionary Algorithms and LLMs in Creative Tasks

[00:21:25] Symbolic vs. Sub-Symbolic Approaches in AI

[00:28:05] Language as Internal Thought and External Communication

[00:30:20] AGI Development and Goal-Directed Behavior

[00:35:51] Consciousness and AI: Expanding States of Experience

[00:48:50] AI Regulation: Challenges and Approaches

[00:55:35] Challenges in AI Regulation

[00:59:20] AI Alignment and Ethical Considerations

[01:09:15] AGI Development Timeline Predictions

[01:12:40] OpenCog Hyperon and AGI Progress

[01:17:48] Transhumanism and Resource Allocation Debate

[01:20:12] Cultural Perspectives on Transhumanism

[01:23:54] AGI and Post-Scarcity Society

[01:31:35] Challenges and Implications of AGI Development

New! PDF Show notes: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/fyetzwgoaf70gpovyfc4x/BenGoertzel.pdf?rlkey=pze5dt9vgf01tf2wip32p5hk5&st=svbcofm3&dl=0

Refs:

00:00:15 Ray Kurzweil's AGI timeline prediction, Ray Kurzweil, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity

00:01:45 Ben Goertzel: SingularityNET founder, Ben Goertzel, https://singularitynet.io/

00:02:35 AGI Conference series, AGI Conference Organizers, https://agi-conf.org/2024/

00:03:55 Ben Goertzel's contributions to AGI, Wikipedia contributors, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Goertzel

00:11:05 Chain-of-Thought prompting, Subbarao Kambhampati, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04776

00:11:35 Algorithmic information content, Pieter Adriaans, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-entropy/

00:12:10 Turing completeness in neural networks, Various contributors, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/turing-machine/

00:16:15 AlphaGeometry: AI for geometry problems, Trieu, Li, et al., https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06747-5

00:18:25 Shane Legg and Ben Goertzel's collaboration, Shane Legg, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shane_Legg

00:20:00 Evolutionary algorithms in music generation, Yanxu Chen, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.03715v1

00:22:00 Peirce's theory of semiotics, Charles Sanders Peirce, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/

00:28:10 Chomsky's view on language, Noam Chomsky, https://chomsky.info/1983____/

00:34:05 Greg Egan's 'Diaspora', Greg Egan, https://www.amazon.co.uk/Diaspora-post-apocalyptic-thriller-perfect-MIRROR/dp/0575082097

00:40:35 'The Consciousness Explosion', Ben Goertzel & Gabriel Axel Montes, https://www.amazon.com/Consciousness-Explosion-Technological-Experiential-Singularity/dp/B0D8C7QYZD

00:41:55 Ray Kurzweil's books on singularity, Ray Kurzweil, https://www.amazon.com/Singularity-Near-Humans-Transcend-Biology/dp/0143037889

00:50:50 California AI regulation bills, California State Senate, https://sd18.senate.ca.gov/news/senate-unanimously-approves-senator-padillas-artificial-intelligence-package

00:56:40 Limitations of Compute Thresholds, Sara Hooker, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05694

00:56:55 'Taming Silicon Valley', Gary F. Marcus, https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/768076/taming-silicon-valley-by-gary-f-marcus/

01:09:15 Kurzweil's AGI prediction update, Ray Kurzweil, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/29/ray-kurzweil-google-ai-the-singularity-is-nearer

AI expert Prof. Gary Marcus doesn't mince words about today's artificial intelligence. He argues that despite the buzz, chatbots like ChatGPT aren't as smart as they seem and could cause real problems if we're not careful.

Marcus is worried about tech companies putting profits before people. He thinks AI could make fake news and privacy issues even worse. He's also concerned that a few big tech companies have too much power. Looking ahead, Marcus believes the AI hype will die down as reality sets in. He wants to see AI developed in smarter, more responsible ways. His message to the public? We need to speak up and demand better AI before it's too late.

Buy Taming Silicon Valley:

https://amzn.to/3XTlC5s

Gary Marcus:

https://garymarcus.substack.com/

https://x.com/GaryMarcus

Interviewer:

Dr. Tim Scarfe

(Refs in top comment)

TOC

[00:00:00] AI Flaws, Improvements & Industry Critique

[00:16:29] AI Safety Theater & Image Generation Issues

[00:23:49] AI's Lack of World Models & Human-like Understanding

[00:31:09] LLMs: Superficial Intelligence vs. True Reasoning

[00:34:45] AI in Specialized Domains: Chess, Coding & Limitations

[00:42:10] AI-Generated Code: Capabilities & Human-AI Interaction

[00:48:10] AI Regulation: Industry Resistance & Oversight Challenges

[00:54:55] Copyright Issues in AI & Tech Business Models

[00:57:26] AI's Societal Impact: Risks, Misinformation & Ethics

[01:23:14] AI X-risk, Alignment & Moral Principles Implementation

[01:37:10] Persistent AI Flaws: System Limitations & Architecture Challenges

[01:44:33] AI Future: Surveillance Concerns, Economic Challenges & Neuro-Symbolic AI

YT version with refs: https://youtu.be/o9MfuUoGlSw

Prof. Mark Solms, a neuroscientist and psychoanalyst, discusses his groundbreaking work on consciousness, challenging conventional cortex-centric views and emphasizing the role of brainstem structures in generating consciousness and affect.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Key points discussed:

The limitations of vision-centric approaches to consciousness studies.

Evidence from decorticated animals and hydranencephalic children supporting the brainstem's role in consciousness.

The relationship between homeostasis, the free energy principle, and consciousness.

Critiques of behaviorism and modern theories of consciousness.

The importance of subjective experience in understanding brain function.

The discussion also explored broader topics:

The potential impact of affect-based theories on AI development.

The role of the SEEKING system in exploration and learning.

Connections between neuroscience, psychoanalysis, and philosophy of mind.

Challenges in studying consciousness and the limitations of current theories.

Mark Solms:

https://neuroscience.uct.ac.za/contacts/mark-solms

Show notes and transcript: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/roipwmnlfmwk2e7kivzms/ACjZF-VIGC2-Suo30KcwVV0?rlkey=53y8v2cajfcgrf17p1h7v3suz&st=z8vu81hn&dl=0

TOC (*) are best bits

00:00:00 1. Intro: Challenging vision-centric approaches to consciousness *

00:02:20 2. Evidence from decorticated animals and hydranencephalic children *

00:07:40 3. Emotional responses in hydranencephalic children

00:10:40 4. Brainstem stimulation and affective states

00:15:00 5. Brainstem's role in generating affective consciousness *

00:21:50 6. Dual-aspect monism and the mind-brain relationship

00:29:37 7. Information, affect, and the hard problem of consciousness *

00:37:25 8. Wheeler's participatory universe and Chalmers' theories

00:48:51 9. Homeostasis, free energy principle, and consciousness *

00:59:25 10. Affect, voluntary behavior, and decision-making

01:05:45 11. Psychoactive substances, REM sleep, and consciousness research

01:12:14 12. Critiquing behaviorism and modern consciousness theories *

01:24:25 13. The SEEKING system and exploration in neuroscience

Refs:

1. Mark Solms' book "The Hidden Spring" [00:20:34] (MUST READ!)

https://amzn.to/3XyETb3

2. Karl Friston's free energy principle [00:03:50]

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn2787

3. Hydranencephaly condition [00:07:10]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydranencephaly

4. Periaqueductal gray (PAG) [00:08:57]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periaqueductal_gray

5. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) [00:13:52]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography

6. Paul MacLean's triune brain theory [00:03:30]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triune_brain

7. Baruch Spinoza's philosophy of mind [00:23:48]

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-epistemology-mind

8. Claude Shannon's "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" [00:32:15]

https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf

9. Francis Crick's "The Astonishing Hypothesis" [00:39:57]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Astonishing_Hypothesis

10. Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument [00:40:54]

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/

11. Mesolimbic dopamine system [01:11:51]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesolimbic_pathway

12. Jaak Panksepp's SEEKING system [01:25:23]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaak_Panksepp#Affective_neuroscience

Dr. Patrick Lewis, who coined the term RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and now works at Cohere, discusses the evolution of language models, RAG systems, and challenges in AI evaluation.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmented generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Key topics covered:

- Origins and evolution of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)

- Challenges in evaluating RAG systems and language models

- Human-AI collaboration in research and knowledge work

- Word embeddings and the progression to modern language models

- Dense vs sparse retrieval methods in information retrieval

The discussion also explored broader implications and applications:

- Balancing faithfulness and fluency in RAG systems

- User interface design for AI-augmented research tools

- The journey from chemistry to AI research

- Challenges in enterprise search compared to web search

- The importance of data quality in training AI models

Patrick Lewis: https://www.patricklewis.io/

Cohere Command Models, check them out - they are amazing for RAG!

https://cohere.com/command

TOC

00:00:00 1. Intro to RAG

00:05:30 2. RAG Evaluation: Poll framework & model performance

00:12:55 3. Data Quality: Cleanliness vs scale in AI training

00:15:13 4. Human-AI Collaboration: Research agents & UI design

00:22:57 5. RAG Origins: Open-domain QA to generative models

00:30:18 6. RAG Challenges: Info retrieval, tool use, faithfulness

00:42:01 7. Dense vs Sparse Retrieval: Techniques & trade-offs

00:47:02 8. RAG Applications: Grounding, attribution, hallucination prevention

00:54:04 9. UI for RAG: Human-computer interaction & model optimization

00:59:01 10. Word Embeddings: Word2Vec, GloVe, and semantic spaces

01:06:43 11. Language Model Evolution: BERT, GPT, and beyond

01:11:38 12. AI & Human Cognition: Sequential processing & chain-of-thought

Refs:

1. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) paper / Patrick Lewis et al. [00:27:45]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401

2. LAMA (LAnguage Model Analysis) probe / Petroni et al. [00:26:35]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01066

3. KILT (Knowledge Intensive Language Tasks) benchmark / Petroni et al. [00:27:05]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02252

4. Word2Vec algorithm / Tomas Mikolov et al. [01:00:25]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781

5. GloVe (Global Vectors for Word Representation) / Pennington et al. [01:04:35]

https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/glove/

6. BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) / Devlin et al. [01:08:00]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805

7. 'The Language Game' book / Nick Chater and Morten H. Christiansen [01:11:40]

https://amzn.to/4grEUpG

Disclaimer: This is the sixth video from our Cohere partnership. We were not told what to say in the interview. Filmed in Seattle in June 2024.

Ashley Edwards, who was working at DeepMind when she co-authored the Genie paper and is now at Runway, covered several key aspects of the Genie AI system and its applications in video generation, robotics, and game creation.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Genie's approach to learning interactive environments, balancing compression and fidelity.

The use of latent action models and VQE models for video processing and tokenization.

Challenges in maintaining action consistency across frames and integrating text-to-image models.

Evaluation metrics for AI-generated content, such as FID and PS&R diff metrics.

The discussion also explored broader implications and applications:

The potential impact of AI video generation on content creation jobs.

Applications of Genie in game generation and robotics.

The use of foundation models in robotics and the differences between internet video data and specialized robotics data.

Challenges in mapping AI-generated actions to real-world robotic actions.

Ashley Edwards: https://ashedwards.github.io/

TOC (*) are best bits

00:00:00 1. Intro to Genie & Brave Search API: Trade-offs & limitations *

00:02:26 2. Genie's Architecture: Latent action, VQE, video processing *

00:05:06 3. Genie's Constraints: Frame consistency & image model integration

00:07:26 4. Evaluation: FID, PS&R diff metrics & latent induction methods

00:09:44 5. AI Video Gen: Content creation impact, depth & parallax effects

00:11:39 6. Model Scaling: Training data impact & computational trade-offs

00:13:50 7. Game & Robotics Apps: Gamification & action mapping challenges *

00:16:16 8. Robotics Foundation Models: Action space & data considerations *

00:19:18 9. Mask-GPT & Video Frames: Real-time optimization, RL from videos

00:20:34 10. Research Challenges: AI value, efficiency vs. quality, safety

00:24:20 11. Future Dev: Efficiency improvements & fine-tuning strategies

Refs:

1. Genie (learning interactive environments from videos) / Ashley and DM collegues [00:01]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15391

2. VQ-VAE (Vector Quantized Variational Autoencoder) / Aaron van den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, Koray Kavukcuoglu [02:43]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00937

3. FID (Fréchet Inception Distance) metric / Martin Heusel et al. [07:37]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.08500

4. PS&R (Precision and Recall) metric / Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi et al. [08:02]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00035

5. Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture / Alexey Dosovitskiy et al. [12:14]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929

6. Genie (robotics foundation models) / Google DeepMind [17:34]

https://deepmind.google/research/publications/60474/

7. Chelsea Finn's lab work on robotics datasets / Chelsea Finn [17:38]

https://ai.stanford.edu/~cbfinn/

8. Imitation from observation in reinforcement learning / YuXuan Liu [20:58]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03374

9. Waymo's autonomous driving technology / Waymo [22:38]

https://waymo.com/

10. Gen3 model release by Runway / Runway [23:48]

https://runwayml.com/

11. Classifier-free guidance technique / Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans [24:43]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12598

Saurabh Baji discusses Cohere's approach to developing and deploying large language models (LLMs) for enterprise use.

* Cohere focuses on pragmatic, efficient models tailored for business applications rather than pursuing the largest possible models.

* They offer flexible deployment options, from cloud services to on-premises installations, to meet diverse enterprise needs.

* Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is highlighted as a critical capability, allowing models to leverage enterprise data securely.

* Cohere emphasizes model customization, fine-tuning, and tools like reranking to optimize performance for specific use cases.

* The company has seen significant growth, transitioning from developer-focused to enterprise-oriented services.

* Major customers like Oracle, Fujitsu, and TD Bank are using Cohere's models across various applications, from HR to finance.

* Baji predicts a surge in enterprise AI adoption over the next 12-18 months as more companies move from experimentation to production.

* He emphasizes the importance of trust, security, and verifiability in enterprise AI applications.

The interview provides insights into Cohere's strategy, technology, and vision for the future of enterprise AI adoption.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/saurabhbaji/

https://x.com/sbaji

https://cohere.com/

https://cohere.com/business

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

TOC (*) are best bits

00:00:00 1. Introduction and Background

00:04:24 2. Cloud Infrastructure and LLM Optimization

00:06:43 2.1 Model deployment and fine-tuning strategies *

00:09:37 3. Enterprise AI Deployment Strategies

00:11:10 3.1 Retrieval-augmented generation in enterprise environments *

00:13:40 3.2 Standardization vs. customization in cloud services *

00:18:20 4. AI Model Evaluation and Deployment

00:18:20 4.1 Comprehensive evaluation frameworks *

00:21:20 4.2 Key components of AI model stacks *

00:25:50 5. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) in Enterprise

00:32:10 5.1 Pragmatic approach to RAG implementation *

00:33:45 6. AI Agents and Tool Integration

00:33:45 6.1 Leveraging tools for AI insights *

00:35:30 6.2 Agent-based AI systems and diagnostics *

00:42:55 7. AI Transparency and Reasoning Capabilities

00:49:10 8. AI Model Training and Customization

00:57:10 9. Enterprise AI Model Management

01:02:10 9.1 Managing AI model versions for enterprise customers *

01:04:30 9.2 Future of language model programming *

01:06:10 10. AI-Driven Software Development

01:06:10 10.1 AI bridging human expression and task achievement *

01:08:00 10.2 AI-driven virtual app fabrics in enterprise *

01:13:33 11. Future of AI and Enterprise Applications

01:21:55 12. Cohere's Customers and Use Cases

01:21:55 12.1 Cohere's growth and enterprise partnerships *

01:27:14 12.2 Diverse customers using generative AI *

01:27:50 12.3 Industry adaptation to generative AI *

01:29:00 13. Technical Advantages of Cohere Models

01:29:00 13.1 Handling large context windows *

01:29:40 13.2 Low latency impact on developer productivity *

Disclaimer: This is the fifth video from our Cohere partnership. We were not told what to say in the interview, and didn't edit anything out from the interview. Filmed in Seattle in Aug 2024.

David Hanson, CEO of Hanson Robotics and creator of the humanoid robot Sofia, explores the intersection of artificial intelligence, ethics, and human potential. In this thought-provoking interview, Hanson discusses his vision for developing AI systems that embody the best aspects of humanity while pushing beyond our current limitations, aiming to achieve what he calls "super wisdom."

YT version: https://youtu.be/LFCIEhlsozU

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

The interview with David Hanson covers:

The importance of incorporating biological drives and compassion into AI systems

Hanson's concept of "existential pattern ethics" as a basis for AI morality

The potential for AI to enhance human intelligence and wisdom

Challenges in developing artificial general intelligence (AGI)

The need to democratize AI technologies globally

Potential future advancements in human-AI integration and their societal impacts

Concerns about technological augmentation exacerbating inequality

The role of ethics in guiding AI development and deployment

Hanson advocates for creating AI systems that embody the best aspects of humanity while surpassing current human limitations, aiming for "super wisdom" rather than just artificial super intelligence.

David Hanson:

https://www.hansonrobotics.com/david-hanson/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u1O954cMmE

TOC

1. Introduction and Background [00:00:00]

1.1. David Hanson's interdisciplinary background [0:01:49]

1.2. Introduction to Sofia, the realistic robot [0:03:27]

2. Human Cognition and AI [0:03:50]

2.1. Importance of social interaction in cognition [0:03:50]

2.2. Compassion as distinguishing factor [0:05:55]

2.3. AI augmenting human intelligence [0:09:54]

3. Developing Human-like AI [0:13:17]

3.1. Incorporating biological drives in AI [0:13:17]

3.2. Creating AI with agency [0:20:34]

3.3. Implementing flexible desires in AI [0:23:23]

4. Ethics and Morality in AI [0:27:53]

4.1. Enhancing humanity through AI [0:27:53]

4.2. Existential pattern ethics [0:30:14]

4.3. Expanding morality beyond restrictions [0:35:35]

5. Societal Impact of AI [0:38:07]

5.1. AI adoption and integration [0:38:07]

5.2. Democratizing AI technologies [0:38:32]

5.3. Human-AI integration and identity [0:43:37]

6. Future Considerations [0:50:03]

6.1. Technological augmentation and inequality [0:50:03]

6.2. Emerging technologies for mental health [0:50:32]

6.3. Corporate ethics in AI development [0:52:26]

This was filmed at AGI-24

David Spivak, a mathematician known for his work in category theory, discusses a wide range of topics related to intelligence, creativity, and the nature of knowledge. He explains category theory in simple terms and explores how it relates to understanding complex systems and relationships.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

We discuss abstract concepts like collective intelligence, the importance of embodiment in understanding the world, and how we acquire and process knowledge. Spivak shares his thoughts on creativity, discussing where it comes from and how it might be modeled mathematically.

A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence on human thinking and its potential role in the evolution of intelligence. Spivak also touches on the importance of language, particularly written language, in transmitting knowledge and shaping our understanding of the world.

David Spivak

http://www.dspivak.net/

TOC:

00:00:00 Introduction to category theory and functors

00:04:40 Collective intelligence and sense-making

00:09:54 Embodiment and physical concepts in knowledge acquisition

00:16:23 Creativity, open-endedness, and AI's impact on thinking

00:25:46 Modeling creativity and the evolution of intelligence

00:36:04 Evolution, optimization, and the significance of AI

00:44:14 Written language and its impact on knowledge transmission

REFS:

Mike Levin's work

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=luouyakAAAAJ&hl=en

Eric Smith's videos on complexity and early life

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpJZw-68QyE

Richard Dawkins' book "The Selfish Gene"

https://amzn.to/3X73X8w

Carl Sagan's statement about the cosmos knowing itself

https://amzn.to/3XhPruK

Herbert Simon's concept of "satisficing"

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bounded-rationality/

DeepMind paper on open-ended systems

https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04268

Karl Friston's work on active inference

https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5299/Active-InferenceThe-Free-Energy-Principle-in-Mind

MIT category theory lectures by David Spivak (available on the Topos Institute channel)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UusLtx9fIjs

Jürgen Schmidhuber, the father of generative AI shares his groundbreaking work in deep learning and artificial intelligence. In this exclusive interview, he discusses the history of AI, some of his contributions to the field, and his vision for the future of intelligent machines. Schmidhuber offers unique insights into the exponential growth of technology and the potential impact of AI on humanity and the universe.

YT version: https://youtu.be/DP454c1K_vQ

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

TOC

00:00:00 Intro

00:03:38 Reasoning

00:13:09 Potential AI Breakthroughs Reducing Computation Needs

00:20:39 Memorization vs. Generalization in AI

00:25:19 Approach to the ARC Challenge

00:29:10 Perceptions of Chat GPT and AGI

00:58:45 Abstract Principles of Jurgen's Approach

01:04:17 Analogical Reasoning and Compression

01:05:48 Breakthroughs in 1991: the P, the G, and the T in ChatGPT and Generative AI

01:15:50 Use of LSTM in Language Models by Tech Giants

01:21:08 Neural Network Aspect Ratio Theory

01:26:53 Reinforcement Learning Without Explicit Teachers

Refs:

★ "Annotated History of Modern AI and Deep Learning" (2022 survey by Schmidhuber):

★ Chain Rule For Backward Credit Assignment (Leibniz, 1676)

★ First Neural Net / Linear Regression / Shallow Learning (Gauss & Legendre, circa 1800)

★ First 20th Century Pioneer of Practical AI (Quevedo, 1914)

★ First Recurrent NN (RNN) Architecture (Lenz, Ising, 1920-1925)

★ AI Theory: Fundamental Limitations of Computation and Computation-Based AI (Gödel, 1931-34)

★ Unpublished ideas about evolving RNNs (Turing, 1948)

★ Multilayer Feedforward NN Without Deep Learning (Rosenblatt, 1958)

★ First Published Learning RNNs (Amari and others, ~1972)

★ First Deep Learning (Ivakhnenko & Lapa, 1965)

★ Deep Learning by Stochastic Gradient Descent (Amari, 1967-68)

★ ReLUs (Fukushima, 1969)

★ Backpropagation (Linnainmaa, 1970); precursor (Kelley, 1960)

★ Backpropagation for NNs (Werbos, 1982)

★ First Deep Convolutional NN (Fukushima, 1979); later combined with Backprop (Waibel 1987, Zhang 1988).

★ Metalearning or Learning to Learn (Schmidhuber, 1987)

★ Generative Adversarial Networks / Artificial Curiosity / NN Online Planners (Schmidhuber, Feb 1990; see the G in Generative AI and ChatGPT)

★ NNs Learn to Generate Subgoals and Work on Command (Schmidhuber, April 1990)

★ NNs Learn to Program NNs: Unnormalized Linear Transformer (Schmidhuber, March 1991; see the T in ChatGPT)

★ Deep Learning by Self-Supervised Pre-Training. Distilling NNs (Schmidhuber, April 1991; see the P in ChatGPT)

★ Experiments with Pre-Training; Analysis of Vanishing/Exploding Gradients, Roots of Long Short-Term Memory / Highway Nets / ResNets (Hochreiter, June 1991, further developed 1999-2015 with other students of Schmidhuber)

★ LSTM journal paper (1997, most cited AI paper of the 20th century)

★ xLSTM (Hochreiter, 2024)

★ Reinforcement Learning Prompt Engineer for Abstract Reasoning and Planning (Schmidhuber 2015)

★ Mindstorms in Natural Language-Based Societies of Mind (2023 paper by Schmidhuber's team)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17066

★ Bremermann's physical limit of computation (1982)

EXTERNAL LINKS

CogX 2018 - Professor Juergen Schmidhuber

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17shdT9-wuA

Discovering Neural Nets with Low Kolmogorov Complexity and High Generalization Capability (Neural Networks, 1997)

https://sferics.idsia.ch/pub/juergen/loconet.pdf

The paradox at the heart of mathematics: Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem - Marcus du Sautoy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4pQbo5MQOs

(Refs truncated, full version on YT VD)

Professor Pedro Domingos, is an AI researcher and professor of computer science. He expresses skepticism about current AI regulation efforts and argues for faster AI development rather than slowing it down. He also discusses the need for new innovations to fulfil the promises of current AI techniques.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmented generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Show notes:

* Domingos' views on AI regulation and why he believes it's misguided

* His thoughts on the current state of AI technology and its limitations

* Discussion of his novel "2040", a satirical take on AI and tech culture

* Explanation of his work on "tensor logic", which aims to unify neural networks and symbolic AI

* Critiques of other approaches in AI, including those of OpenAI and Gary Marcus

* Thoughts on the AI "bubble" and potential future developments in the field

Prof. Pedro Domingos:

https://x.com/pmddomingos

2040: A Silicon Valley Satire [Pedro's new book]

https://amzn.to/3T51ISd

TOC:

00:00:00 Intro

00:06:31 Bio

00:08:40 Filmmaking skit

00:10:35 AI and the wisdom of crowds

00:19:49 Social Media

00:27:48 Master algorithm

00:30:48 Neurosymbolic AI / abstraction

00:39:01 Language

00:45:38 Chomsky

01:00:49 2040 Book

01:18:03 Satire as a shield for criticism?

01:29:12 AI Regulation

01:35:15 Gary Marcus

01:52:37 Copyright

01:56:11 Stochastic parrots come home to roost

02:00:03 Privacy

02:01:55 LLM ecosystem

02:05:06 Tensor logic

Refs:

The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World [Pedro Domingos]

https://amzn.to/3MiWs9B

Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust [Gary Marcus]

https://amzn.to/3AAywvL

Flash Boys [Michael Lewis]

https://amzn.to/4dUGm1M

Andrew Ilyas, a PhD student at MIT who is about to start as a professor at CMU. We discuss Data modeling and understanding how datasets influence model predictions, Adversarial examples in machine learning and why they occur, Robustness in machine learning models, Black box attacks on machine learning systems, Biases in data collection and dataset creation, particularly in ImageNet and Self-selection bias in data and methods to address it.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api

Andrew's site:

https://andrewilyas.com/

https://x.com/andrew_ilyas

TOC:

00:00:00 - Introduction and Andrew's background

00:03:52 - Overview of the machine learning pipeline

00:06:31 - Data modeling paper discussion

00:26:28 - TRAK: Evolution of data modeling work

00:43:58 - Discussion on abstraction, reasoning, and neural networks

00:53:16 - "Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features" paper

01:03:24 - Types of features learned by neural networks

01:10:51 - Black box attacks paper

01:15:39 - Work on data collection and bias

01:25:48 - Future research plans and closing thoughts

References:

Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02175

TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scale

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.14186

Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Data

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.00622

Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02175

IMAGENET-TRAINED CNNS

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.12231

ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization Based Black-box

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.03999

A Spline Theory of Deep Networks

https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/balestriero18b/balestriero18b.pdf

Scaling Monosemanticity

https://transformer-circuits.pub/2024/scaling-monosemanticity/

Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features

https://gradientscience.org/adv/

Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment Studies

https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/bartoldson24a.html

Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priors

https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.07978

Estimation of Standard Auction Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.02060

From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarks

https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11295

Estimation of Standard Auction Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.02060

What Makes A Good Fisherman? Linear Regression under Self-Selection Bias

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03246

Towards Tracing Factual Knowledge in Language Models Back to the

Training Data [Akyürek]

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.11482

Dr. Joscha Bach introduces a surprising idea called "cyber animism" in his AGI-24 talk - the notion that nature might be full of self-organizing software agents, similar to the spirits in ancient belief systems. Bach suggests that consciousness could be a kind of software running on our brains, and wonders if similar "programs" might exist in plants or even entire ecosystems.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Joscha takes us on a tour de force through history, philosophy, and cutting-edge computer science, teasing us to rethink what we know about minds, machines, and the world around us. Joscha believes we should blur the lines between human, artificial, and natural intelligence, and argues that consciousness might be more widespread and interconnected than we ever thought possible.

Dr. Joscha Bach

https://x.com/Plinz

This is video 2/9 from our coverage of AGI-24 in Seattle https://agi-conf.org/2024/

Watch the official MLST interview with Joscha which we did right after this talk on our Patreon now on early access - https://www.patreon.com/posts/joscha-bach-110199676 (you also get access to our private discord and biweekly calls)

TOC:

00:00:00 Introduction: AGI and Cyberanimism

00:03:57 The Nature of Consciousness

00:08:46 Aristotle's Concepts of Mind and Consciousness

00:13:23 The Hard Problem of Consciousness

00:16:17 Functional Definition of Consciousness

00:20:24 Comparing LLMs and Human Consciousness

00:26:52 Testing for Consciousness in AI Systems

00:30:00 Animism and Software Agents in Nature

00:37:02 Plant Consciousness and Ecosystem Intelligence

00:40:36 The California Institute for Machine Consciousness

00:44:52 Ethics of Conscious AI and Suffering

00:46:29 Philosophical Perspectives on Consciousness

00:49:55 Q&A: Formalisms for Conscious Systems

00:53:27 Coherence, Self-Organization, and Compute Resources

YT version (very high quality, filmed by us live)

https://youtu.be/34VOI_oo-qM

Refs:

Aristotle's work on the soul and consciousness

Richard Dawkins' work on genes and evolution

Gerald Edelman's concept of Neural Darwinism

Thomas Metzinger's book "Being No One"

Yoshua Bengio's concept of the "consciousness prior"

Stuart Hameroff's theories on microtubules and consciousness

Christof Koch's work on consciousness

Daniel Dennett's "Cartesian Theater" concept

Giulio Tononi's Integrated Information Theory

Mike Levin's work on organismal intelligence

The concept of animism in various cultures

Freud's model of the mind

Buddhist perspectives on consciousness and meditation

The Genesis creation narrative (for its metaphorical interpretation)

California Institute for Machine Consciousness

Prof Gary Marcus revisited his keynote from AGI-21, noting that many of the issues he highlighted then are still relevant today despite significant advances in AI.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Gary Marcus criticized current large language models (LLMs) and generative AI for their unreliability, tendency to hallucinate, and inability to truly understand concepts.

Marcus argued that the AI field is experiencing diminishing returns with current approaches, particularly the "scaling hypothesis" that simply adding more data and compute will lead to AGI.

He advocated for a hybrid approach to AI that combines deep learning with symbolic AI, emphasizing the need for systems with deeper conceptual understanding.

Marcus highlighted the importance of developing AI with innate understanding of concepts like space, time, and causality.

He expressed concern about the moral decline in Silicon Valley and the rush to deploy potentially harmful AI technologies without adequate safeguards.

Marcus predicted a possible upcoming "AI winter" due to inflated valuations, lack of profitability, and overhyped promises in the industry.

He stressed the need for better regulation of AI, including transparency in training data, full disclosure of testing, and independent auditing of AI systems.

Marcus proposed the creation of national and global AI agencies to oversee the development and deployment of AI technologies.

He concluded by emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, focusing on robust AI with deep understanding, and implementing smart, agile governance for AI and AGI.

YT Version (very high quality filmed)

https://youtu.be/91SK90SahHc

Pre-order Gary's new book here:

Taming Silicon Valley: How We Can Ensure That AI Works for Us

https://amzn.to/4fO46pY

Filmed at the AGI-24 conference:

https://agi-conf.org/2024/

TOC:

00:00:00 Introduction

00:02:34 Introduction by Ben G

00:05:17 Gary Marcus begins talk

00:07:38 Critiquing current state of AI

00:12:21 Lack of progress on key AI challenges

00:16:05 Continued reliability issues with AI

00:19:54 Economic challenges for AI industry

00:25:11 Need for hybrid AI approaches

00:29:58 Moral decline in Silicon Valley

00:34:59 Risks of current generative AI

00:40:43 Need for AI regulation and governance

00:49:21 Concluding thoughts

00:54:38 Q&A: Cycles of AI hype and winters

01:00:10 Predicting a potential AI winter

01:02:46 Discussion on interdisciplinary approach

01:05:46 Question on regulating AI

01:07:27 Ben G's perspective on AI winter

DeepMind Research Scientist / MIT scholar Dr. Timothy Nguyen discusses his recent paper on understanding transformers through n-gram statistics. Nguyen explains his approach to analyzing transformer behavior using a kind of "template matching" (N-grams), providing insights into how these models process and predict language.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Key points covered include:

A method for describing transformer predictions using n-gram statistics without relying on internal mechanisms.

The discovery of a technique to detect overfitting in large language models without using holdout sets.

Observations on curriculum learning, showing how transformers progress from simpler to more complex rules during training.

Discussion of distance measures used in the analysis, particularly the variational distance.

Exploration of model sizes, training dynamics, and their impact on the results.

We also touch on philosophical aspects of describing versus explaining AI behavior, and the challenges in understanding the abstractions formed by neural networks. Nguyen concludes by discussing potential future research directions, including attempts to convert descriptions of transformer behavior into explanations of internal mechanisms.

Timothy Nguyen's earned his B.S. and Ph.D. in mathematics from Caltech and MIT, respectively. He held positions as Research Assistant Professor at the Simons Center for Geometry and Physics (2011-2014) and Visiting Assistant Professor at Michigan State University (2014-2017). During this time, his research expanded into high-energy physics, focusing on mathematical problems in quantum field theory. His work notably provided a simplified and corrected formulation of perturbative path integrals.

Since 2017, Nguyen has been working in industry, applying his expertise to machine learning. He is currently at DeepMind, where he contributes to both fundamental research and practical applications of deep learning to solve real-world problems.

Refs:

The Cartesian Cafe

https://www.youtube.com/@TimothyNguyen

Understanding Transformers via N-Gram Statistics

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382204056_Understanding_Transformers_via_N-Gram_Statistics

TOC

00:00:00 Timothy Nguyen's background

00:02:50 Paper overview: transformers and n-gram statistics

00:04:55 Template matching and hash table approach

00:08:55 Comparing templates to transformer predictions

00:12:01 Describing vs explaining transformer behavior

00:15:36 Detecting overfitting without holdout sets

00:22:47 Curriculum learning in training

00:26:32 Distance measures in analysis

00:28:58 Model sizes and training dynamics

00:30:39 Future research directions

00:32:06 Conclusion and future topics

Jay Alammar, renowned AI educator and researcher at Cohere, discusses the latest developments in large language models (LLMs) and their applications in industry. Jay shares his expertise on retrieval augmented generation (RAG), semantic search, and the future of AI architectures.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Cohere Command R model series: https://cohere.com/command

Jay Alamaar:

https://x.com/jayalammar

Buy Jay's new book here!

Hands-On Large Language Models: Language Understanding and Generation

https://amzn.to/4fzOUgh

TOC:

00:00:00 Introduction to Jay Alammar and AI Education

00:01:47 Cohere's Approach to RAG and AI Re-ranking

00:07:15 Implementing AI in Enterprise: Challenges and Solutions

00:09:26 Jay's Role at Cohere and the Importance of Learning in Public

00:15:16 The Evolution of AI in Industry: From Deep Learning to LLMs

00:26:12 Expert Advice for Newcomers in Machine Learning

00:32:39 The Power of Semantic Search and Embeddings in AI Systems

00:37:59 Jay Alammar's Journey as an AI Educator and Visualizer

00:43:36 Visual Learning in AI: Making Complex Concepts Accessible

00:47:38 Strategies for Keeping Up with Rapid AI Advancements

00:49:12 The Future of Transformer Models and AI Architectures

00:51:40 Evolution of the Transformer: From 2017 to Present

00:54:19 Preview of Jay's Upcoming Book on Large Language Models

Disclaimer: This is the fourth video from our Cohere partnership. We were not told what to say in the interview, and didn't edit anything out from the interview. Note also that this combines several previously unpublished interviews from Jay into one, the earlier one at Tim's house was shot in Aug 2023, and the more recent one in Toronto in May 2024.

Refs:

The Illustrated Transformer

https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-transformer/

Attention Is All You Need

https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks

http://karpathy.github.io/2015/05/21/rnn-effectiveness/

Neural Networks in 11 Lines of Code

https://iamtrask.github.io/2015/07/12/basic-python-network/

Understanding LSTM Networks (Chris Olah's blog post)

http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/

Luis Serrano's YouTube Channel

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgBncpylJ1kiVaPyP-PZauQ

Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks

https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084

GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) models

https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-gpt2/

https://openai.com/research/gpt-4

BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)

https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-bert/

https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805

RoPE (Rotary Positional Encoding)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.09864 (Linked paper discussing rotary embeddings)

Grouped Query Attention

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13245

RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback)

https://openai.com/research/learning-from-human-preferences

https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03741

DPO (Direct Preference Optimization)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290

Daniel Cahn, co-founder of Slingshot AI, on the potential of AI in therapy. Why is anxiety and depression affecting a large population? To what extent are these real categories? Why is the mental health getting worse? How often do you want an AI to agree with you? What are the ethics of persuasive AI? You will discover all in this conversation.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

Daniel Cahn (who is also hiring ML engineers by the way!)

https://x.com/thecahnartist?lang=en

/ cahnd

https://thinkingmachinespodcast.com/

TOC:

00:00:00 Intro

00:01:56 Therapy effectiveness vs drugs and societal implications

00:04:02 Mental health categories: Iatrogenesis and social constructs

00:10:19 Psychiatric treatment models and cognitive perspectives

00:13:30 AI design and human-like interactions: Intentionality debates

00:20:04 AI in therapy: Ethics, anthropomorphism, and loneliness mitigation

00:28:13 Therapy efficacy: Neuroplasticity, suffering, and AI placebos

00:33:29 AI's impact on human agency and cognitive modeling

00:41:17 Social media's effects on brain structure and behavior

00:50:46 AI ethics: Altering values and free will considerations

01:00:00 Work value perception and personal identity formation

01:13:37 Free will, agency, and mutable personal identity in therapy

01:24:27 AI in healthcare: Challenges, ethics, and therapy improvements

01:53:25 AI development: Societal impacts and cultural implications

Full references on YT VD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hwX6OZyNC0 (and baked into mp3 metadata)

Prof. Subbarao Kambhampati argues that while LLMs are impressive and useful tools, especially for creative tasks, they have fundamental limitations in logical reasoning and cannot provide guarantees about the correctness of their outputs. He advocates for hybrid approaches that combine LLMs with external verification systems.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at http://brave.com/api.

TOC (sorry the ones baked into the MP3 were wrong apropos due to LLM hallucination!)

[00:00:00] Intro

[00:02:06] Bio

[00:03:02] LLMs are n-gram models on steroids

[00:07:26] Is natural language a formal language?

[00:08:34] Natural language is formal?

[00:11:01] Do LLMs reason?

[00:19:13] Definition of reasoning

[00:31:40] Creativity in reasoning

[00:50:27] Chollet's ARC challenge

[01:01:31] Can we reason without verification?

[01:10:00] LLMs cant solve some tasks

[01:19:07] LLM Modulo framework

[01:29:26] Future trends of architecture

[01:34:48] Future research directions

Youtube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1WnHpedi2A

Refs: (we didn't have space for URLs here, check YT video description instead)

How seriously should governments take the threat of existential risk from AI, given the lack of consensus among researchers? On the one hand, existential risks (x-risks) are necessarily somewhat speculative: by the time there is concrete evidence, it may be too late. On the other hand, governments must prioritize — after all, they don’t worry too much about x-risk from alien invasions.

MLST is sponsored by Brave:

The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at brave.com/api.

Sayash Kapoor is a computer science Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University's Center for Information Technology Policy. His research focuses on the societal impact of AI. Kapoor has previously worked on AI in both industry and academia, with experience at Facebook, Columbia University, and EPFL Switzerland. He is a recipient of a best paper award at ACM FAccT and an impact recognition award at ACM CSCW. Notably, Kapoor was included in TIME's inaugural list of the 100 most influential people in AI.

Sayash Kapoor

https://x.com/sayashk

https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~sayashk/

Arvind Narayanan (other half of the AI Snake Oil duo)

https://x.com/random_walker

AI existential risk probabilities are too unreliable to inform policy

https://www.aisnakeoil.com/p/ai-existential-risk-probabilities

Pre-order AI Snake Oil Book

https://amzn.to/4fq2HGb

AI Snake Oil blog

https://www.aisnakeoil.com/

AI Agents That Matter

https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01502

Shortcut learning in deep neural networks

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Shortcut-learning-in-deep-neural-networks-Geirhos-Jacobsen/1b04936c2599e59b120f743fbb30df2eed3fd782

77% Of Employees Report AI Has Increased Workloads And Hampered Productivity, Study Finds

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2024/07/23/employees-report-ai-increased-workload/

TOC:

00:00:00 Intro

00:01:57 How seriously should we take Xrisk threat?

00:02:55 Risk too unrealiable to inform policy

00:10:20 Overinflated risks

00:12:05 Perils of utility maximisation

00:13:55 Scaling vs airplane speeds

00:17:31 Shift to smaller models?

00:19:08 Commercial LLM ecosystem

00:22:10 Synthetic data

00:24:09 Is AI complexifying our jobs?

00:25:50 Does ChatGPT make us dumber or smarter?

00:26:55 Are AI Agents overhyped?

00:28:12 Simple vs complex baselines

00:30:00 Cost tradeoff in agent design

00:32:30 Model eval vs downastream perf

00:36:49 Shortcuts in metrics

00:40:09 Standardisation of agent evals

00:41:21 Humans in the loop

00:43:54 Levels of agent generality

00:47:25 ARC challenge

Sara Hooker is VP of Research at Cohere and leader of Cohere for AI. We discuss her recent paper critiquing the use of compute thresholds, measured in FLOPs (floating point operations), as an AI governance strategy.

We explore why this approach, recently adopted in both US and EU AI policies, may be problematic and oversimplified. Sara explains the limitations of using raw computational power as a measure of AI capability or risk, and discusses the complex relationship between compute, data, and model architecture.

Equally important, we go into Sara's work on "The AI Language Gap." This research highlights the challenges and inequalities in developing AI systems that work across multiple languages. Sara discusses how current AI models, predominantly trained on English and a handful of high-resource languages, fail to serve the linguistic diversity of our global population. We explore the technical, ethical, and societal implications of this gap, and discuss potential solutions for creating more inclusive and representative AI systems.

We broadly discuss the relationship between language, culture, and AI capabilities, as well as the ethical considerations in AI development and deployment.

YT Version: https://youtu.be/dBZp47999Ko

TOC:

[00:00:00] Intro

[00:02:12] FLOPS paper

[00:26:42] Hardware lottery

[00:30:22] The Language gap

[00:33:25] Safety

[00:38:31] Emergent

[00:41:23] Creativity

[00:43:40] Long tail

[00:44:26] LLMs and society

[00:45:36] Model bias

[00:48:51] Language and capabilities

[00:52:27] Ethical frameworks and RLHF

Sara Hooker

https://www.sarahooker.me/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/sararosehooker/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2xy6h3sAAAAJ&hl=en

https://x.com/sarahookr

Interviewer: Tim Scarfe

Refs

The AI Language gap

https://cohere.com/research/papers/the-AI-language-gap.pdf

On the Limitations of Compute Thresholds as a Governance Strategy.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.05694v1

The Multilingual Alignment Prism: Aligning Global and Local Preferences to Reduce Harm

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.18682

Cohere Aya

https://cohere.com/research/aya

RLHF Can Speak Many Languages: Unlocking Multilingual Preference Optimization for LLMs

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.02552

Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.14740

Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/

EU AI Act

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.pdf

The bitter lesson

http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html

Neel Nanda interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ygf0GnlwmY

Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet

https://transformer-circuits.pub/2024/scaling-monosemanticity/

Chollet's ARC challenge

https://github.com/fchollet/ARC-AGI

Ryan Greenblatt on ARC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9j3wB1RRGA

Disclaimer: This is the third video from our Cohere partnership. We were not told what to say in the interview, and didn't edit anything out from the interview.

Murray Shanahan is a professor of Cognitive Robotics at Imperial College London and a senior research scientist at DeepMind. He challenges our assumptions about AI consciousness and urges us to rethink how we talk about machine intelligence.

We explore the dangers of anthropomorphizing AI, the limitations of current language in describing AI capabilities, and the fascinating intersection of philosophy and artificial intelligence.

Show notes and full references: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ICtBI574W-xGi8Z2ZtUNeKWiOiGZ_DRsp9EnyYAISws/edit?usp=sharing

Prof Murray Shanahan:

https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~mpsha/ (look at his selected publications)

https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=00bnGpAAAAAJ&hl=en

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Shanahan

https://x.com/mpshanahan

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

Refs (links in the Google doc linked above):

Role play with large language models

Waluigi effect

"Conscious Exotica" - Paper by Murray Shanahan (2016)

"Simulators" - Article by Janis from LessWrong

"Embodiment and the Inner Life" - Book by Murray Shanahan (2010)

"The Technological Singularity" - Book by Murray Shanahan (2015)

"Simulacra as Conscious Exotica" - Paper by Murray Shanahan (newer paper of the original focussed on LLMs)

A recent paper by Anthropic on using autoencoders to find features in language models (referring to the "Scaling Monosemanticity" paper)

Work by Peter Godfrey-Smith on octopus consciousness

"Metaphors We Live By" - Book by George Lakoff (1980s)

Work by Aaron Sloman on the concept of "space of possible minds" (1984 article mentioned)

Wittgenstein's "Philosophical Investigations" (posthumously published)

Daniel Dennett's work on the "intentional stance"

Alan Turing's original paper on the Turing Test (1950)

Thomas Nagel's paper "What is it like to be a bat?" (1974)

John Searle's Chinese Room Argument (mentioned but not detailed)

Work by Richard Evans on tackling reasoning problems

Claude Shannon's quote on knowledge and control

"Are We Bodies or Souls?" - Book by Richard Swinburne

Reference to work by Ethan Perez and others at Anthropic on potential deceptive behavior in language models

Reference to a paper by Murray Shanahan and Antonia Creswell on the "selection inference framework"

Mention of work by Francois Chollet, particularly the ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) challenge

Reference to Elizabeth Spelke's work on core knowledge in infants

Mention of Karl Friston's work on planning as inference (active inference)

The film "Ex Machina" - Murray Shanahan was the scientific advisor

"The Waluigi Effect"

Anthropic's constitutional AI approach

Loom system by Lara Reynolds and Kyle McDonald for visualizing conversation trees

DeepMind's AlphaGo (mentioned multiple times as an example)

Mention of the "Golden Gate Claude" experiment

Reference to an interview Tim Scarfe conducted with University of Toronto students about self-attention controllability theorem

Mention of an interview with Irina Rish

Reference to an interview Tim Scarfe conducted with Daniel Dennett

Reference to an interview with Maria Santa Caterina

Mention of an interview with Philip Goff

Nick Chater and Martin Christianson's book ("The Language Game: How Improvisation Created Language and Changed the World")

Peter Singer's work from 1975 on ascribing moral status to conscious beings

Demis Hassabis' discussion on the "ladder of creativity"

Reference to B.F. Skinner and behaviorism

In the coming decades, the technology that enables virtual and augmented reality will improve beyond recognition. Within a century, world-renowned philosopher David J. Chalmers predicts, we will have virtual worlds that are impossible to distinguish from non-virtual worlds. But is virtual reality just escapism?

In a highly original work of 'technophilosophy', Chalmers argues categorically, no: virtual reality is genuine reality. Virtual worlds are not second-class worlds. We can live a meaningful life in virtual reality - and increasingly, we will.

What is reality, anyway? How can we lead a good life? Is there a god? How do we know there's an external world - and how do we know we're not living in a computer simulation? In Reality+, Chalmers conducts a grand tour of philosophy, using cutting-edge technology to provide invigorating new answers to age-old questions.

David J. Chalmers is an Australian philosopher and cognitive scientist specializing in the areas of philosophy of mind and philosophy of language. He is Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University, as well as co-director of NYU's Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness. Chalmers is best known for his work on consciousness, including his formulation of the "hard problem of consciousness."

Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy

https://amzn.to/3RYyGD2

https://consc.net/

https://x.com/davidchalmers42

00:00:00 Reality+ Intro

00:12:02 GPT conscious? 10/10

00:14:19 The consciousness processor thought experiment (11/10)

00:20:34 Intelligence and Consciousness entangled? 10/10

00:22:44 Karl Friston / Meta Problem 10/10

00:29:05 Knowledge argument / subjective experience (6/10)

00:32:34 Emergence 11/10 (best chapter)

00:42:45 Working with Douglas Hofstadter 10/10

00:46:14 Intelligence is analogy making? 10/10

00:50:47 Intelligence explosion 8/10

00:58:44 Hypercomputation 10/10

01:09:44 Who designed the designer? (7/10)

01:13:57 Experience machine (7/10)

Ryan Greenblatt from Redwood Research recently published "Getting 50% on ARC-AGI with GPT-4.0," where he used GPT4o to reach a state-of-the-art accuracy on Francois Chollet's ARC Challenge by generating many Python programs.

Sponsor:

Sign up to Kalshi here https://kalshi.onelink.me/1r91/mlst -- the first 500 traders who deposit $100 will get a free $20 credit! Important disclaimer - In case it's not obvious - this is basically gambling and a *high risk* activity - only trade what you can afford to lose.

We discuss:

- Ryan's unique approach to solving the ARC Challenge and achieving impressive results.

- The strengths and weaknesses of current AI models.

- How AI and humans differ in learning and reasoning.

- Combining various techniques to create smarter AI systems.

- The potential risks and future advancements in AI, including the idea of agentic AI.

https://x.com/RyanPGreenblatt

https://www.redwoodresearch.org/

Refs:

Getting 50% (SoTA) on ARC-AGI with GPT-4o [Ryan Greenblatt]

https://redwoodresearch.substack.com/p/getting-50-sota-on-arc-agi-with-gpt

On the Measure of Intelligence [Chollet]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547

Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis [Jerry A. Fodor and Zenon W. Pylyshyn]

https://ruccs.rutgers.edu/images/personal-zenon-pylyshyn/proseminars/Proseminar13/ConnectionistArchitecture.pdf

Software 2.0 [Andrej Karpathy]

https://karpathy.medium.com/software-2-0-a64152b37c35

Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective [Kenneth Stanley]

https://amzn.to/3Wfy2E0

Biographical account of Terence Tao’s mathematical development. [M.A.(KEN) CLEMENTS]

https://gwern.net/doc/iq/high/smpy/1984-clements.pdf

Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR)

https://metr.org/

Why Tool AIs Want to Be Agent AIs

https://gwern.net/tool-ai

Simulators - Janus

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/vJFdjigzmcXMhNTsx/simulators

AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/d9FJHawgkiMSPjagR/ai-control-improving-safety-despite-intentional-subversion

https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06942

What a Compute-Centric Framework Says About Takeoff Speeds

https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/what-a-compute-centric-framework-says-about-takeoff-speeds/

Global GDP over the long run

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-gdp-over-the-long-run?yScale=log

Safety Cases: How to Justify the Safety of Advanced AI Systems

https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10462

The Danger of a “Safety Case"

http://sunnyday.mit.edu/The-Danger-of-a-Safety-Case.pdf

The Future Of Work Looks Like A UPS Truck (~02:15:50)

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/05/02/308640135/episode-536-the-future-of-work-looks-like-a-ups-truck

SWE-bench

https://www.swebench.com/

Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG

530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.11990

Algorithmic Progress in Language Models

https://epochai.org/blog/algorithmic-progress-in-language-models

Aidan Gomez, CEO of Cohere, reveals how they're tackling AI hallucinations and improving reasoning abilities. He also explains why Cohere doesn't use any output from GPT-4 for training their models.

Aidan shares his personal insights into the world of AI and LLMs and Cohere's unique approach to solving real-world business problems, and how their models are set apart from the competition. Aidan reveals how they are making major strides in AI technology, discussing everything from last mile customer engineering to the robustness of prompts and future architectures.

He also touches on the broader implications of AI for society, including potential risks and the role of regulation. He discusses Cohere's guiding principles and the health the of startup scene. With a particular focus on enterprise applications. Aidan provides a rare look into the internal workings of Cohere and their vision for driving productivity and innovation.

https://cohere.com/

https://x.com/aidangomez

Check out Cohere's amazing new Command R* models here

https://cohere.com/command

Disclaimer: This is the second video from our Cohere partnership. We were not told what to say in the interview, and didn't edit anything out from the interview.

The ARC Challenge, created by Francois Chollet, tests how well AI systems can generalize from a few examples in a grid-based intelligence test. We interview the current winners of the ARC Challenge—Jack Cole, Mohammed Osman and their collaborator Michael Hodel. They discuss how they tackled ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) using language models. We also discuss the new "50%" public set approach announced today from Redwood Research (Ryan Greenblatt). Jack and Mohammed explain their winning approach, which involves fine-tuning a language model on a large, specifically-generated dataset and then doing additional fine-tuning at test-time, a technique known in this context as "active inference". They use various strategies to represent the data for the language model and believe that with further improvements, the accuracy could reach above 50%. Michael talks about his work on generating new ARC-like tasks to help train the models. They also debate whether their methods stay true to the "spirit" of Chollet's measure of intelligence. Despite some concerns, they agree that their solutions are promising and adaptable for other similar problems. Note: Jack's team is still the current official winner at 33% on the private set. Ryan's entry is not on the private leaderboard or eligible. Chollet invented ARC in 2019 (not 2017 as stated) "Ryan's entry is not a new state of the art. We don't know exactly how well it does since it was only evaluated on 100 tasks from the evaluation set and does 50% on those, reportedly. Meanwhile Jacks team i.e. MindsAI's solution does 54% on the entire eval set and it is seemingly possible to do 60-70% with an ensemble" Jack Cole: https://x.com/Jcole75Cole https://lab42.global/community-interview-jack-cole/ Mohamed Osman: Mohamed is looking to do a PhD in AI/ML, can you help him? Email: mothman198@outlook.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/mohamedosman1905/ Michael Hodel: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.07353v1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-hodel/ https://x.com/bayesilicon https://github.com/michaelhodel Getting 50% (SoTA) on ARC-AGI with GPT-4o - Ryan Greenblatt https://redwoodresearch.substack.com/p/getting-50-sota-on-arc-agi-with-gpt Neural networks for abstraction and reasoning: Towards broad generalization in machines [Mikel Bober-Irizar, Soumya Banerjee] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.03507 Measure of intelligence: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547 YT version: https://youtu.be/jSAT_RuJ_Cg

Nick Frosst, co-founder of Cohere, on the future of LLMs, and AGI. Learn how Cohere is solving real problems for business with their new AI models.

This is the first podcast from our new Cohere partnership!

Nick talks about his journey at Google Brain, working with AI legends like Geoff Hinton, and the amazing things his company, Cohere, is doing. From creating the must useful language models for businesses to making tools for developers, Nick shares a lot of interesting insights. He even talks about his band, Good Kid! Nick said that RAG is one of the best features of Cohere's new Command R* models. We are about to release a deep-dive on RAG with Patrick Lewis from Cohere, keep an eye out for that - he explains why their models are specifically optimised for RAG use cases.

Learn more about Cohere Command R* models here:

https://cohere.com/commandhttps://github.com/cohere-ai/cohere-toolkit

Nick's band Good Kid:

https://goodkidofficial.com/

Nick on Twitter:

https://x.com/nickfrosst

Disclaimer: We are in a partnership with Cohere to release content for them. We were not told what to say in the interview, and didn't edit anything out from the interview. We are currently planning to release 2 shows per month under the partnership about their AI platform, research and strategy.

These two scientists have mapped out the insides or “reachable space” of a language model using control theory, what they discovered was extremely surprising.

Please support us on Patreon to get access to the private Discord server, bi-weekly calls, early access and ad-free listening.

https://patreon.com/mlst

YT version: https://youtu.be/Bpgloy1dDn0

Aman Bhargava from Caltech and Cameron Witkowski from the University of Toronto to discuss their groundbreaking paper, “What’s the Magic Word? A Control Theory of LLM Prompting.” (the main theorem on self-attention controllability was developed in collaboration with Dr. Shi-Zhuo Looi from Caltech).

They frame LLM systems as discrete stochastic dynamical systems. This means they look at LLMs in a structured way, similar to how we analyze control systems in engineering. They explore the “reachable set” of outputs for an LLM. Essentially, this is the range of possible outputs the model can generate from a given starting point when influenced by different prompts. The research highlights that prompt engineering, or optimizing the input tokens, can significantly influence LLM outputs. They show that even short prompts can drastically alter the likelihood of specific outputs. Aman and Cameron’s work might be a boon for understanding and improving LLMs. They suggest that a deeper exploration of control theory concepts could lead to more reliable and capable language models.

We dropped an additional, more technical video on the research on our Twitter account here: https://x.com/MLStreetTalk/status/1795093759471890606

Additional 20 minutes of unreleased footage on our Patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/whats-magic-word-104922629

What's the Magic Word? A Control Theory of LLM Prompting (Aman Bhargava, Cameron Witkowski, Manav Shah, Matt Thomson)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04444

LLM Control Theory Seminar (April 2024)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QtS9sVBFM0

Society for the pursuit of AGI (Cameron founded it)

https://agisociety.mydurable.com/

Roger Federer demo

http://conway.languagegame.io/inference

Neural Cellular Automata, Active Inference, and the Mystery of Biological Computation (Aman)

https://aman-bhargava.com/ai/neuro/neuromorphic/2024/03/25/nca-do-active-inference.html

Aman and Cameron also want to thank Dr. Shi-Zhuo Looi and Prof. Matt Thomson from from Caltech for help and advice on their research. (https://thomsonlab.caltech.edu/ and https://pma.caltech.edu/people/looi-shi-zhuo)

https://x.com/ABhargava2000

https://x.com/witkowski_cam

Maria Santacaterina, with her background in the humanities, brings a critical perspective on the current state and future implications of AI technology, its impact on society, and the nature of human intelligence and creativity. She emphasizes that despite technological advancements, AI lacks fundamental human traits such as consciousness, empathy, intuition, and the ability to engage in genuine creative processes. Maria argues that AI, at its core, processes data but does not have the capability to understand or generate new, intrinsic meaning or ideas as humans do.

Throughout the conversation, Maria highlights her concern about the overreliance on AI in critical sectors such as healthcare, the justice system, and business. She stresses that while AI can serve as a tool, it should not replace human judgment and decision-making. Maria points out that AI systems often operate on past data, which may lead to outdated or incorrect decisions if not carefully managed.

The discussion also touches upon the concept of "adaptive resilience", which Maria describes in her book. She explains adaptive resilience as the capacity for individuals and enterprises to evolve and thrive amidst challenges by leveraging technology responsibly, without undermining human values and capabilities.

A significant portion of the conversation focussed on ethical considerations surrounding AI. Tim and Maria agree that there's a pressing need for strong governance and ethical frameworks to guide AI development and deployment. They discuss how AI, without proper ethical considerations, risks exacerbating issues like privacy invasion, misinformation, and unintended discrimination.

Maria is skeptical about claims of achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or a technological singularity where machines surpass human intelligence in all aspects. She argues that such scenarios neglect the complex, dynamic nature of human intelligence and consciousness, which cannot be fully replicated or replaced by machines.

Tim and Maria discuss the importance of keeping human agency and creativity at the forefront of technology development. Maria asserts that efforts to automate or standardize complex human actions and decisions are misguided and could lead to dehumanizing outcomes. They both advocate for using AI as an aid to enhance human capabilities rather than a substitute.

In closing, Maria encourages a balanced approach to AI adoption, urging stakeholders to prioritize human well-being, ethical standards, and societal benefit above mere technological advancement. The conversation ends with Maria pointing people to her book for more in-depth analysis and thoughts on the future interaction between humans and technology.

Buy Maria's book here: https://amzn.to/4avF6kq

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariasantacaterina

TOC

00:00:00 - Intro to Book

00:03:23 - What Life Is

00:10:10 - Agency

00:18:04 - Tech and Society

00:21:51 - System 1 and 2

00:22:59 - We Are Being Pigeonholed

00:30:22 - Agency vs Autonomy

00:36:37 - Explanations

00:40:24 - AI Reductionism

00:49:50 - How Are Humans Intelligent

01:00:22 - Semantics

01:01:53 - Emotive AI and Pavlovian Dogs

01:04:05 - Technology, Social Media and Organisation

01:18:34 - Systems Are Not That Automated

01:19:33 - Hiring

01:22:34 - Subjectivity in Orgs

01:32:28 - The AGI Delusion

01:45:37 - GPT-laziness Syndrome

01:54:58 - Diversity Preservation

01:58:24 - Ethics

02:11:43 - Moral Realism

02:16:17 - Utopia

02:18:02 - Reciprocity

02:20:52 - Tyranny of Categorisation

Thomas Parr and his collaborators wrote a book titled "Active Inference: The Free Energy Principle in Mind, Brain and Behavior" which introduces Active Inference from both a high-level conceptual perspective and a low-level mechanistic, mathematical perspective.

Active inference, developed by the legendary neuroscientist Prof. Karl Friston - is a unifying mathematical framework which frames living systems as agents which minimize surprise and free energy in order to resist entropy and persist over time. It unifies various perspectives from physics, biology, statistics, and psychology - and allows us to explore deep questions about agency, biology, causality, modelling, and consciousness.

Buy Active Inference: The Free Energy Principle in Mind, Brain, and Behavior

https://amzn.to/4dj0iMj

YT version: https://youtu.be/lbb-Si5wa_o

Please support us on Patreon to get access to the private Discord server, bi-weekly calls, early access and ad-free listening.

https://patreon.com/mlst

Chapters should be embedded in the mp3, let me me know if issues

Connor is the CEO of Conjecture and one of the most famous names in the AI alignment movement. This is the "behind the scenes footage" and bonus Patreon interviews from the day of the Beff Jezos debate, including an interview with Daniel Clothiaux. It's a great insight into Connor's philosophy. At the end there is an unreleased additional interview with Beff.

Support MLST:

Please support us on Patreon. We are entirely funded from Patreon donations right now. Patreon supports get private discord access, biweekly calls, very early-access + exclusive content and lots more.

https://patreon.com/mlst

Donate: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=K2TYRVPBGXVNA

If you would like to sponsor us, so we can tell your story - reach out on mlstreettalk at gmail

Topics:

Externalized cognition and the role of society and culture in human intelligence

The potential for AI systems to develop agency and autonomy

The future of AGI as a complex mixture of various components

The concept of agency and its relationship to power

The importance of coherence in AI systems

The balance between coherence and variance in exploring potential upsides

The role of dynamic, competent, and incorruptible institutions in handling risks and developing technology

Concerns about AI widening the gap between the haves and have-nots

The concept of equal access to opportunity and maintaining dynamism in the system

Leahy's perspective on life as a process that "rides entropy"

The importance of distinguishing between epistemological, decision-theoretic, and aesthetic aspects of morality (inc ref to Hume's Guillotine)

The concept of continuous agency and the idea that the first AGI will be a messy admixture of various components

The potential for AI systems to become more physically embedded in the future

The challenges of aligning AI systems and the societal impacts of AI technologies like ChatGPT and Bing

The importance of humility in the face of complexity when considering the future of AI and its societal implications

Disclaimer: this video is not an endorsement of e/acc or AGI agential existential risk from us - the hosts of MLST consider both of these views to be quite extreme. We seek diverse views on the channel.

00:00:00 Intro

00:00:56 Connor's Philosophy

00:03:53 Office Skit

00:05:08 Connor on e/acc and Beff

00:07:28 Intro to Daniel's Philosophy

00:08:35 Connor on Entropy, Life, and Morality

00:19:10 Connor on London

00:20:21 Connor Office Interview

00:20:46 Friston Patreon Preview

00:21:48 Why Are We So Dumb?

00:23:52 The Voice of the People, the Voice of God / Populism

00:26:35 Mimetics

00:30:03 Governance

00:33:19 Agency

00:40:25 Daniel Interview - Externalised Cognition, Bing GPT, AGI

00:56:29 Beff + Connor Bonus Patreons Interview

Professor Chris Bishop is a Technical Fellow and Director at Microsoft Research AI4Science, in Cambridge. He is also Honorary Professor of Computer Science at the University of Edinburgh, and a Fellow of Darwin College, Cambridge. In 2004, he was elected Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, in 2007 he was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and in 2017 he was elected Fellow of the Royal Society. Chris was a founding member of the UK AI Council, and in 2019 he was appointed to the Prime Minister’s Council for Science and Technology.

At Microsoft Research, Chris oversees a global portfolio of industrial research and development, with a strong focus on machine learning and the natural sciences.

Chris obtained a BA in Physics from Oxford, and a PhD in Theoretical Physics from the University of Edinburgh, with a thesis on quantum field theory.

Chris's contributions to the field of machine learning have been truly remarkable. He has authored (what is arguably) the original textbook in the field - 'Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning' (PRML) which has served as an essential reference for countless students and researchers around the world, and that was his second textbook after his highly acclaimed first textbook Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition.

Recently, Chris has co-authored a new book with his son, Hugh, titled 'Deep Learning: Foundations and Concepts.' This book aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the key ideas and techniques underpinning the rapidly evolving field of deep learning. It covers both the foundational concepts and the latest advances, making it an invaluable resource for newcomers and experienced practitioners alike.

Buy Chris' textbook here:

https://amzn.to/3vvLcCh

More about Prof. Chris Bishop:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Bishop

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/people/cmbishop/

Support MLST:

Please support us on Patreon. We are entirely funded from Patreon donations right now. Patreon supports get private discord access, biweekly calls, early-access + exclusive content and lots more.

https://patreon.com/mlst

Donate: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=K2TYRVPBGXVNA

If you would like to sponsor us, so we can tell your story - reach out on mlstreettalk at gmail

TOC:

00:00:00 - Intro to Chris

00:06:54 - Changing Landscape of AI

00:08:16 - Symbolism

00:09:32 - PRML

00:11:02 - Bayesian Approach

00:14:49 - Are NNs One Model or Many, Special vs General

00:20:04 - Can Language Models Be Creative

00:22:35 - Sparks of AGI

00:25:52 - Creativity Gap in LLMs

00:35:40 - New Deep Learning Book

00:39:01 - Favourite Chapters

00:44:11 - Probability Theory

00:45:42 - AI4Science

00:48:31 - Inductive Priors

00:58:52 - Drug Discovery

01:05:19 - Foundational Bias Models

01:07:46 - How Fundamental Is Our Physics Knowledge?

01:12:05 - Transformers

01:12:59 - Why Does Deep Learning Work?

01:16:59 - Inscrutability of NNs

01:18:01 - Example of Simulator

01:21:09 - Control

Dr. Philip Ball is a freelance science writer. He just wrote a book called "How Life Works", discussing the how the science of Biology has advanced in the last 20 years. We focus on the concept of Agency in particular.

He trained as a chemist at the University of Oxford, and as a physicist at the University of Bristol. He worked previously at Nature for over 20 years, first as an editor for physical sciences and then as a consultant editor. His writings on science for the popular press have covered topical issues ranging from cosmology to the future of molecular biology.

YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6nxUiqiz9I

Transcript link on YT description

Philip is the author of many popular books on science, including H2O: A Biography of Water, Bright Earth: The Invention of Colour, The Music Instinct and Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything. His book Critical Mass won the 2005 Aventis Prize for Science Books, while Serving the Reich was shortlisted for the Royal Society Winton Science Book Prize in 2014.

This is one of Tim's personal favourite MLST shows, so we have designated it a special edition. Enjoy!

Buy Philip's book "How Life Works" here: https://amzn.to/3vSmNqp

Support MLST: Please support us on Patreon. We are entirely funded from Patreon donations right now. Patreon supports get private discord access, biweekly calls, early-access + exclusive content and lots more. https://patreon.com/mlst Donate: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted... If you would like to sponsor us, so we can tell your story - reach out on mlstreettalk at gmail

Dr. Paul Lessard and his collaborators have written a paper on "Categorical Deep Learning and Algebraic Theory of Architectures". They aim to make neural networks more interpretable, composable and amenable to formal reasoning. The key is mathematical abstraction, as exemplified by category theory - using monads to develop a more principled, algebraic approach to structuring neural networks.

We also discussed the limitations of current neural network architectures in terms of their ability to generalise and reason in a human-like way. In particular, the inability of neural networks to do unbounded computation equivalent to a Turing machine. Paul expressed optimism that this is not a fundamental limitation, but an artefact of current architectures and training procedures.

The power of abstraction - allowing us to focus on the essential structure while ignoring extraneous details. This can make certain problems more tractable to reason about. Paul sees category theory as providing a powerful "Lego set" for productively thinking about many practical problems.

Towards the end, Paul gave an accessible introduction to some core concepts in category theory like categories, morphisms, functors, monads etc. We explained how these abstract constructs can capture essential patterns that arise across different domains of mathematics.

Paul is optimistic about the potential of category theory and related mathematical abstractions to put AI and neural networks on a more robust conceptual foundation to enable interpretability and reasoning. However, significant theoretical and engineering challenges remain in realising this vision.

Please support us on Patreon. We are entirely funded from Patreon donations right now.

https://patreon.com/mlst

If you would like to sponsor us, so we can tell your story - reach out on mlstreettalk at gmail

Links:

Categorical Deep Learning: An Algebraic Theory of Architectures

Bruno Gavranović, Paul Lessard, Andrew Dudzik,

Tamara von Glehn, João G. M. Araújo, Petar Veličković

Paper: https://categoricaldeeplearning.com/

Symbolica:

https://twitter.com/symbolica

https://www.symbolica.ai/

Dr. Paul Lessard (Principal Scientist - Symbolica)

https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-roy-lessard/

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC:

00:00:00 - Intro

00:05:07 - What is the category paper all about

00:07:19 - Composition

00:10:42 - Abstract Algebra

00:23:01 - DSLs for machine learning

00:24:10 - Inscrutibility

00:29:04 - Limitations with current NNs

00:30:41 - Generative code / NNs don't recurse

00:34:34 - NNs are not Turing machines (special edition)

00:53:09 - Abstraction

00:55:11 - Category theory objects

00:58:06 - Cat theory vs number theory

00:59:43 - Data and Code are one in the same

01:08:05 - Syntax and semantics

01:14:32 - Category DL elevator pitch

01:17:05 - Abstraction again

01:20:25 - Lego set for the universe

01:23:04 - Reasoning

01:28:05 - Category theory 101

01:37:42 - Monads

01:45:59 - Where to learn more cat theory

Dr. Minqi Jiang and Dr. Marc Rigter explain an innovative new method to make the intelligence of agents more general-purpose by training them to learn many worlds before their usual goal-directed training, which we call "reinforcement learning". Their new paper is called "Reward-free curricula for training robust world models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.09205.pdf https://twitter.com/MinqiJiang https://twitter.com/MarcRigter Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe Please support us on Patreon, Tim is now doing MLST full-time and taking a massive financial hit. If you love MLST and want this to continue, please show your support! In return you get access to shows very early and private discord and networking. https://patreon.com/mlst We are also looking for show sponsors, please get in touch if interested mlstreettalk at gmail. MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/machine-learning-street-talk-mlst-937356144060530778

Nick Chater is Professor of Behavioural Science at Warwick Business School, who works on rationality and language using a range of theoretical and experimental approaches. We discuss his books The Mind is Flat, and the Language Game.

Please support me on Patreon (this is now my main job!) - https://patreon.com/mlst - Access the private Discord, networking, and early access to content.

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/machine-learning-street-talk-mlst-937356144060530778

https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Buy The Language Game:

https://amzn.to/3SRHjPm

Buy The Mind is Flat:

https://amzn.to/3P3BUUC

YT version: https://youtu.be/5cBS6COzLN4

https://www.wbs.ac.uk/about/person/nick-chater/

https://twitter.com/nickjchater?lang=en

See what Sam Altman advised Kenneth when he left OpenAI! Professor Kenneth Stanley has just launched a brand new type of social network, which he calls a "Serendipity network". The idea is that you follow interests, NOT people. It's a social network without the popularity contest. We discuss the phgilosophy and technology behind the venture in great detail. The main ideas of which came from Kenneth's famous book "Why greatness cannot be planned".

See what Sam Altman advised Kenneth when he left OpenAI! Professor Kenneth Stanley has just launched a brand new type of social network, which he calls a "Serendipity network".The idea is that you follow interests, NOT people. It's a social network without the popularity contest.

YT version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWIrXN-yy8g

Chapters should be baked into the MP3 file now

MLST public Discord: https://discord.gg/machine-learning-street-talk-mlst-937356144060530778 Please support our work on Patreon - get access to interviews months early, private Patreon, networking, exclusive content and regular calls with Tim and Keith. https://patreon.com/mlst Get Maven here: https://www.heymaven.com/ Kenneth: https://twitter.com/kenneth0stanley https://www.kenstanley.net/home Host - Tim Scarfe: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ecsquizor/ https://www.mlst.ai/ Original MLST show with Kenneth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhYGXYeMq_E

Tim explains the book more here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNhaz81OOqw

Brandon Rohrer who obtained his Ph.D from MIT is driven by understanding algorithms ALL the way down to their nuts and bolts, so he can make them accessible to everyone by first explaining them in the way HE himself would have wanted to learn!

Please support us on Patreon for loads of exclusive content and private Discord:

https://patreon.com/mlst (public discord)

https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Brandon Rohrer is a seasoned data science leader and educator with a rich background in creating robust, efficient machine learning algorithms and tools. With a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, his expertise encompasses a broad spectrum of AI applications — from computer vision and natural language processing to reinforcement learning and robotics. Brandon's career has seen him in Principle-level roles at Microsoft and Facebook. An educator at heart, he also shares his knowledge through detailed tutorials, courses, and his forthcoming book, "How to Train Your Robot."

YT version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ps7ahonRCY

Brandon's links:

https://github.com/brohrer

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsBKTrp45lTfHa_p49I2AEQ

https://www.linkedin.com/in/brohrer/

How transformers work:

https://e2eml.school/transformers

Brandon's End-to-End Machine Learning school courses, posts, and tutorials

https://e2eml.school

Free course:

https://end-to-end-machine-learning.teachable.com/p/complete-course-library-full-end-to-end-machine-learning-catalog

Blog: https://e2eml.school/blog.html

Ziptie: Learning Useful Features [Brandon Rohrer]

https://www.brandonrohrer.com/ziptie

TOC should be baked into the MP3 file now

00:00:00 - Intro to Brandon

00:00:36 - RLHF

00:01:09 - Limitations of transformers

00:07:23 - Agency - we are all GPTs

00:09:07 - BPE / representation bias

00:12:00 - LLM true believers

00:16:42 - Brandon's style of teaching

00:19:50 - ML vs real world = Robotics

00:29:59 - Reward shaping

00:37:08 - No true Scotsman - when do we accept capabilities as real

00:38:50 - Externalism

00:43:03 - Building flexible robots

00:45:37 - Is reward enough

00:54:30 - Optimization curse

00:58:15 - Collective intelligence

01:01:51 - Intelligence + creativity

01:13:35 - ChatGPT + Creativity

01:25:19 - Transformers Tutorial

The world's second-most famous AI doomer Connor Leahy sits down with Beff Jezos, the founder of the e/acc movement debating technology, AI policy, and human values. As the two discuss technology, AI safety, civilization advancement, and the future of institutions, they clash on their opposing perspectives on how we steer humanity towards a more optimal path.

Watch behind the scenes, get early access and join the private Discord by supporting us on Patreon. We have some amazing content going up there with Max Bennett and Kenneth Stanley this week! https://patreon.com/mlst (public discord) https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Post-interview with Beff and Connor: https://www.patreon.com/posts/97905213

Pre-interview with Connor and his colleague Dan Clothiaux: https://www.patreon.com/posts/connor-leahy-and-97631416

Leahy, known for his critical perspectives on AI and technology, challenges Jezos on a variety of assertions related to the accelerationist movement, market dynamics, and the need for regulation in the face of rapid technological advancements. Jezos, on the other hand, provides insights into the e/acc movement's core philosophies, emphasizing growth, adaptability, and the dangers of over-legislation and centralized control in current institutions.

Throughout the discussion, both speakers explore the concept of entropy, the role of competition in fostering innovation, and the balance needed to mediate order and chaos to ensure the prosperity and survival of civilization. They weigh up the risks and rewards of AI, the importance of maintaining a power equilibrium in society, and the significance of cultural and institutional dynamism.

Beff Jezos (Guillaume Verdon): https://twitter.com/BasedBeffJezos https://twitter.com/GillVerd Connor Leahy: https://twitter.com/npcollapse

YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxi0xSBOaQ

TOC:

00:00:00 - Intro

00:03:05 - Society library reference

00:03:35 - Debate starts

00:05:08 - Should any tech be banned?

00:20:39 - Leaded Gasoline

00:28:57 - False vacuum collapse method?

00:34:56 - What if there are dangerous aliens?

00:36:56 - Risk tolerances

00:39:26 - Optimizing for growth vs value

00:52:38 - Is vs ought

01:02:29 - AI discussion

01:07:38 - War / global competition

01:11:02 - Open source F16 designs

01:20:37 - Offense vs defense

01:28:49 - Morality / value

01:43:34 - What would Conor do

01:50:36 - Institutions/regulation

02:26:41 - Competition vs. Regulation Dilemma

02:32:50 - Existential Risks and Future Planning

02:41:46 - Conclusion and Reflection

Note from Tim: I baked the chapter metadata into the mp3 file this time, does that help the chapters show up in your app? Let me know. Also I accidentally exported a few minutes of dead audio at the end of the file - sorry about that just skip on when the episode finishes.

Watch behind the scenes, get early access and join the private Discord by supporting us on Patreon:

https://patreon.com/mlst (public discord)

https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

YT version: https://youtu.be/n8G50ynU0Vg

In this interview on MLST, Dr. Tim Scarfe interviews Mahault Albarracin, who is the director of product for R&D at VERSES and also a PhD student in cognitive computing at the University of Quebec in Montreal. They discuss a range of topics related to consciousness, cognition, and machine learning.

Throughout the conversation, they touch upon various philosophical and computational concepts such as panpsychism, computationalism, and materiality. They consider the "hard problem" of consciousness, which is the question of how and why we have subjective experiences.

Albarracin shares her views on the controversial Integrated Information Theory and the open letter of opposition it received from the scientific community. She reflects on the nature of scientific critique and rivalry, advising caution in declaring entire fields of study as pseudoscientific.

A substantial part of the discussion is dedicated to the topic of science itself, where Albarracin talks about thresholds between legitimate science and pseudoscience, the role of evidence, and the importance of validating scientific methods and claims.

They touch upon language models, discussing whether they can be considered as having a "theory of mind" and the implications of assigning such properties to AI systems. Albarracin challenges the idea that there is a pure form of intelligence independent of material constraints and emphasizes the role of sociality in the development of our cognitive abilities.

Albarracin offers her thoughts on scientific endeavors, the predictability of systems, the nature of intelligence, and the processes of learning and adaptation. She gives insights into the concept of using degeneracy as a way to increase resilience within systems and the role of maintaining a degree of redundancy or extra capacity as a buffer against unforeseen events.

The conversation concludes with her discussing the potential benefits of collective intelligence, likening the adaptability and resilience of interconnected agent systems to those found in natural ecosystems.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mahault-albarracin-1742bb153/

00:00:00 - Intro / IIT scandal

00:05:54 - Gaydar paper / What makes good science

00:10:51 - Language

00:18:16 - Intelligence

00:29:06 - X-risk

00:40:49 - Self modelling

00:43:56 - Anthropomorphisation

00:46:41 - Mediation and subjectivity

00:51:03 - Understanding

00:56:33 - Resiliency

Technical topics:

1. Integrated Information Theory (IIT) - Giulio Tononi

2. The "hard problem" of consciousness - David Chalmers

3. Panpsychism and Computationalism in philosophy of mind

4. Active Inference Framework - Karl Friston

5. Theory of Mind and its computation in AI systems

6. Noam Chomsky's views on language models and linguistics

7. Daniel Dennett's Intentional Stance theory

8. Collective intelligence and system resilience

9. Redundancy and degeneracy in complex systems

10. Michael Levin's research on bioelectricity and pattern formation

11. The role of phenomenology in cognitive science

Chai AI is the leading platform for conversational chat artificial intelligence.

Note: this is a sponsored episode of MLST.

William Beauchamp is the founder of two $100M+ companies - Chai Research, an AI startup, and Seamless Capital, a hedge fund based in Cambridge, UK. Chaiverse is the Chai AI developer platform, where developers can train, submit and evaluate on millions of real users to win their share of $1,000,000. https://www.chai-research.com https://www.chaiverse.com https://twitter.com/chai_research https://facebook.com/chairesearch/ https://www.instagram.com/chairesearch/ Download the app on iOS and Android (https://onelink.to/kqzhy9 ) #chai #chai_ai #chai_research #chaiverse #generative_ai #LLMs

Watch behind the scenes, get early access and join the private Discord by supporting us on Patreon:

https://patreon.com/mlst (public discord)

https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

DOES AI HAVE AGENCY? With Professor. Karl Friston and Riddhi J. Pitliya

Agency in the context of cognitive science, particularly when considering the free energy principle, extends beyond just human decision-making and autonomy. It encompasses a broader understanding of how all living systems, including non-human entities, interact with their environment to maintain their existence by minimising sensory surprise.

According to the free energy principle, living organisms strive to minimize the difference between their predicted states and the actual sensory inputs they receive. This principle suggests that agency arises as a natural consequence of this process, particularly when organisms appear to plan ahead many steps in the future.

Riddhi J. Pitliya is based in the computational psychopathology lab doing her Ph.D at the University of Oxford and works with Professor Karl Friston at VERSES.

https://twitter.com/RiddhiJP

References:

THE FREE ENERGY PRINCIPLE—A PRECIS [Ramstead]

https://www.dialecticalsystems.eu/contributions/the-free-energy-principle-a-precis/

Active Inference: The Free Energy Principle in Mind, Brain, and Behavior [Thomas Parr, Giovanni Pezzulo, Karl J. Friston]

https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5299/Active-InferenceThe-Free-Energy-Principle-in-Mind

The beauty of collective intelligence, explained by a developmental biologist | Michael Levin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U93x9AWeuOA

Growing Neural Cellular Automata

https://distill.pub/2020/growing-ca

Carcinisation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinisation

Prof. KENNETH STANLEY - Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhYGXYeMq_E

On Defining Artificial Intelligence [Pei Wang]

https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002

Why? The Purpose of the Universe [Goff]

https://amzn.to/4aEqpfm

Umwelt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umwelt

An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms [Yong]

https://amzn.to/3tzzTb7

What's it like to be a bat [Nagal]

https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Nagel_Bat.pdf

COUNTERFEIT PEOPLE. DANIEL DENNETT. (SPECIAL EDITION)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axJtywd9Tbo

We live in the infosphere [FLORIDI]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLNGvvgq3eg

Mark Zuckerberg: First Interview in the Metaverse | Lex Fridman Podcast #398

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVYrJJNdrEg

Black Mirror: Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too | Official Trailer | Netflix

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qIlCo9yqpY

Watch behind the scenes, get early access and join private Discord by supporting us on Patreon: https://patreon.com/mlst

https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

In this comprehensive exploration of the field of deep learning with Professor Simon Prince who has just authored an entire text book on Deep Learning, we investigate the technical underpinnings that contribute to the field's unexpected success and confront the enduring conundrums that still perplex AI researchers.

Key points discussed include the surprising efficiency of deep learning models, where high-dimensional loss functions are optimized in ways which defy traditional statistical expectations. Professor Prince provides an exposition on the choice of activation functions, architecture design considerations, and overparameterization. We scrutinize the generalization capabilities of neural networks, addressing the seeming paradox of well-performing overparameterized models. Professor Prince challenges popular misconceptions, shedding light on the manifold hypothesis and the role of data geometry in informing the training process. Professor Prince speaks about how layers within neural networks collaborate, recursively reconfiguring instance representations that contribute to both the stability of learning and the emergence of hierarchical feature representations. In addition to the primary discussion on technical elements and learning dynamics, the conversation briefly diverts to audit the implications of AI advancements with ethical concerns.

Follow Prof. Prince:

https://twitter.com/SimonPrinceAI

https://www.linkedin.com/in/simon-prince-615bb9165/

Get the book now!

https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262048644/understanding-deep-learning/

https://udlbook.github.io/udlbook/

Panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe -

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ecsquizor/

https://twitter.com/ecsquendor

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:11:03] General Book Discussion

[00:15:30] The Neural Metaphor

[00:17:56] Back to Book Discussion

[00:18:33] Emergence and the Mind

[00:29:10] Computation in Transformers

[00:31:12] Studio Interview with Prof. Simon Prince

[00:31:46] Why Deep Neural Networks Work: Spline Theory

[00:40:29] Overparameterization in Deep Learning

[00:43:42] Inductive Priors and the Manifold Hypothesis

[00:49:31] Universal Function Approximation and Deep Networks

[00:59:25] Training vs Inference: Model Bias

[01:03:43] Model Generalization Challenges

[01:11:47] Purple Segment: Unknown Topic

[01:12:45] Visualizations in Deep Learning

[01:18:03] Deep Learning Theories Overview

[01:24:29] Tricks in Neural Networks

[01:30:37] Critiques of ChatGPT

[01:42:45] Ethical Considerations in AI

References on YT version VD: https://youtu.be/sJXn4Cl4oww

Watch behind the scenes with Bert on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/posts/bert-de-vries-93230722 https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Note, there is some mild background music on chapter 1 (Least Action), 3 (Friston) and 5 (Variational Methods) - please skip ahead if annoying. It's a tiny fraction of the overall podcast.

YT version: https://youtu.be/2wnJ6E6rQsU

Bert de Vries is Professor in the Signal Processing Systems group at Eindhoven University. His research focuses on the development of intelligent autonomous agents that learn from in-situ interactions with their environment. His research draws inspiration from diverse fields including computational neuroscience, Bayesian machine learning, Active Inference and signal processing. Bert believes that development of signal processing systems will in the future be largely automated by autonomously operating agents that learn purposeful from situated environmental interactions. Bert received nis M.Sc. (1986) and Ph.D. (1991) degrees in Electrical Engineering from Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) and the University of Florida, respectively. From 1992 to 1999, he worked as a research scientist at Sarnoff Research Center in Princeton (NJ, USA). Since 1999, he has been employed in the hearing aids industry, both in engineering and managerial positions. De Vries was appointed part-time professor in the Signal Processing Systems Group at TU/e in 2012. Contact: https://twitter.com/bertdv0 https://www.tue.nl/en/research/researchers/bert-de-vries https://www.verses.ai/about-us Panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe / Dr. Keith Duggar TOC: [00:00:00] Principle of Least Action [00:05:10] Patreon Teaser [00:05:46] On Friston [00:07:34] Capm Peterson (VERSES) [00:08:20] Variational Methods [00:16:13] Dan Mapes (VERSES) [00:17:12] Engineering with Active Inference [00:20:23] Jason Fox (VERSES) [00:20:51] Riddhi Jain Pitliya [00:21:49] Hearing Aids as Adaptive Agents [00:33:38] Steven Swanson (VERSES) [00:35:46] Main Interview Kick Off, Engineering and Active Inference [00:43:35] Actor / Streaming / Message Passing [00:56:21] Do Agents Lose Flexibility with Maturity? [01:00:50] Language Compression [01:04:37] Marginalisation to Abstraction [01:12:45] Online Structural Learning [01:18:40] Efficiency in Active Inference [01:26:25] SEs become Neuroscientists [01:35:11] Building an Automated Engineer [01:38:58] Robustness and Design vs Grow [01:42:38] RXInfer [01:51:12] Resistance to Active Inference? [01:57:39] Diffusion of Responsibility in a System [02:10:33] Chauvinism in "Understanding" [02:20:08] On Becoming a Bayesian Refs: RXInfer https://biaslab.github.io/rxinfer-website/ Prof. Ariel Caticha https://www.albany.edu/physics/faculty/ariel-caticha Pattern recognition and machine learning (Bishop) https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2006/01/Bishop-Pattern-Recognition-and-Machine-Learning-2006.pdf Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial (Sivia) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Data-Analysis-Bayesian-Devinderjit-Sivia/dp/0198568320 Probability Theory: The Logic of Science (E. T. Jaynes) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Probability-Theory-Principles-Elementary-Applications/dp/0521592712/ #activeinference #artificialintelligence

Please support us https://www.patreon.com/mlst

https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Lance Da Costa aims to advance our understanding of intelligent systems by modelling cognitive systems and improving artificial systems.

He's a PhD candidate with Greg Pavliotis and Karl Friston jointly at Imperial College London and UCL, and a student in the Mathematics of Random Systems CDT run by Imperial College London and the University of Oxford. He completed an MRes in Brain Sciences at UCL with Karl Friston and Biswa Sengupta, an MASt in Pure Mathematics at the University of Cambridge with Oscar Randal-Williams, and a BSc in Mathematics at EPFL and the University of Toronto.

Summary:

Lance did pure math originally but became interested in the brain and AI. He started working with Karl Friston on the free energy principle, which claims all intelligent agents minimize free energy for perception, action, and decision-making. Lance has worked to provide mathematical foundations and proofs for why the free energy principle is true, starting from basic assumptions about agents interacting with their environment. This aims to justify the principle from first physics principles. Dr. Scarfe and Da Costa discuss different approaches to AI - the free energy/active inference approach focused on mimicking human intelligence vs approaches focused on maximizing capability like deep reinforcement learning. Lance argues active inference provides advantages for explainability and safety compared to black box AI systems. It provides a simple, sparse description of intelligence based on a generative model and free energy minimization. They discuss the need for structured learning and acquiring core knowledge to achieve more human-like intelligence. Lance highlights work from Josh Tenenbaum's lab that shows similar learning trajectories to humans in a simple Atari-like environment.

Incorporating core knowledge constraints the space of possible generative models the agent can use to represent the world, making learning more sample efficient. Lance argues active inference agents with core knowledge can match human learning capabilities.

They discuss how to make generative models interpretable, such as through factor graphs. The goal is to be able to understand the representations and message passing in the model that leads to decisions.

In summary, Lance argues active inference provides a principled approach to AI with advantages for explainability, safety, and human-like learning. Combining it with core knowledge and structural learning aims to achieve more human-like artificial intelligence.

https://www.lancelotdacosta.com/

https://twitter.com/lancelotdacosta

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC

00:00:00 - Start

00:09:27 - Intelligence

00:12:37 - Priors / structure learning

00:17:21 - Core knowledge

00:29:05 - Intelligence is specialised

00:33:21 - The magic of agents

00:39:30 - Intelligibility of structure learning

#artificialintelligence #activeinference

Please support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

YT version (with intro not found here) https://youtu.be/6iaT-0Dvhnc This is the epic special edition show you have been waiting for! With two of the most brilliant scientists alive today. Atoms, things, agents, ... observers. What even defines an "observer" and what properties must all observers share? How do objects persist in our universe given that their material composition changes over time? What does it mean for a thing to be a thing? And do things supervene on our lower-level physical reality? What does it mean for a thing to have agency? What's the difference between a complex dynamical system with and without agency? Could a rock or an AI catflap have agency? Can the universe be factorised into distinct agents, or is agency diffused? Have you ever pondered about these deep questions about reality? Prof. Friston and Dr. Wolfram have spent their entire careers, some 40+ years each thinking long and hard about these very questions and have developed significant frameworks of reference on their respective journeys (the Wolfram Physics project and the Free Energy principle).

Panel: MIT Ph.D Keith Duggar Production: Dr. Tim Scarfe Refs: TED Talk with Stephen: https://www.ted.com/talks/stephen_wolfram_how_to_think_computationally_about_ai_the_universe_and_everything https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/10/how-to-think-computationally-about-ai-the-universe-and-everything/ TOC 00:00:00 - Show kickoff

00:02:38 - Wolfram gets to grips with FEP

00:27:08 - How much control does an agent/observer have

00:34:52 - Observer persistence, what universe seems like to us

00:40:31 - Black holes

00:45:07 - Inside vs outside

00:52:20 - Moving away from the predictable path

00:55:26 - What can observers do

01:06:50 - Self modelling gives agency

01:11:26 - How do you know a thing has agency?

01:22:48 - Deep link between dynamics, ruliad and AI

01:25:52 - Does agency entail free will? Defining Agency

01:32:57 - Where do I probe for agency?

01:39:13 - Why is the universe the way we see it?

01:42:50 - Alien intelligence

01:43:40 - The hard problem of Observers

01:46:20 - Summary thoughts from Wolfram

01:49:35 - Factorisability of FEP

01:57:05 - Patreon interview teaser

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4praCiy9qU

Dr. Jeff Beck is a computational neuroscientist studying probabilistic reasoning (decision making under uncertainty) in humans and animals with emphasis on neural representations of uncertainty and cortical implementations of probabilistic inference and learning. His line of research incorporates information theoretic and hierarchical statistical analysis of neural and behavioural data as well as reinforcement learning and active inference.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeff-beck...

https://scholar.google.com/citations?...

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC

00:00:00 Intro

00:00:51 Bayesian / Knowledge

00:14:57 Active inference

00:18:58 Mediation

00:23:44 Philosophy of mind / science

00:29:25 Optimisation

00:42:54 Emergence

00:56:38 Steering emergent systems

01:04:31 Work plan

01:06:06 Representations/Core knowledge

#activeinference

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB Prof. Melanie Mitchell argues that the concept of "understanding" in AI is ill-defined and multidimensional - we can't simply say an AI system does or doesn't understand. She advocates for rigorously testing AI systems' capabilities using proper experimental methods from cognitive science. Popular benchmarks for intelligence often rely on the assumption that if a human can perform a task, an AI that performs the task must have human-like general intelligence. But benchmarks should evolve as capabilities improve. Large language models show surprising skill on many human tasks but lack common sense and fail at simple things young children can do. Their knowledge comes from statistical relationships in text, not grounded concepts about the world. We don't know if their internal representations actually align with human-like concepts. More granular testing focused on generalization is needed. There are open questions around whether large models' abilities constitute a fundamentally different non-human form of intelligence based on vast statistical correlations across text. Mitchell argues intelligence is situated, domain-specific and grounded in physical experience and evolution. The brain computes but in a specialized way honed by evolution for controlling the body. Extracting "pure" intelligence may not work. Other key points: - Need more focus on proper experimental method in AI research. Developmental psychology offers examples for rigorous testing of cognition. - Reporting instance-level failures rather than just aggregate accuracy can provide insights. - Scaling laws and complex systems science are an interesting area of complexity theory, with applications to understanding cities. - Concepts like "understanding" and "intelligence" in AI force refinement of fuzzy definitions. - Human intelligence may be more collective and social than we realize. AI forces us to rethink concepts we apply anthropomorphically. The overall emphasis is on rigorously building the science of machine cognition through proper experimentation and benchmarking as we assess emerging capabilities. TOC: [00:00:00] Introduction and Munk AI Risk Debate Highlights [05:00:00] Douglas Hofstadter on AI Risk [00:06:56] The Complexity of Defining Intelligence [00:11:20] Examining Understanding in AI Models [00:16:48] Melanie's Insights on AI Understanding Debate [00:22:23] Unveiling the Concept Arc [00:27:57] AI Goals: A Human vs Machine Perspective [00:31:10] Addressing the Extrapolation Challenge in AI [00:36:05] Brain Computation: The Human-AI Parallel [00:38:20] The Arc Challenge: Implications and Insights [00:43:20] The Need for Detailed AI Performance Reporting [00:44:31] Exploring Scaling in Complexity Theory Eratta: Note Tim said around 39 mins that a recent Stanford/DM paper modelling ARC “on GPT-4 got around 60%”. This is not correct and he misremembered. It was actually davinci3, and around 10%, which is still extremely good for a blank slate approach with an LLM and no ARC specific knowledge. Folks on our forum couldn’t reproduce the result. See paper linked below. Books (MUST READ): Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans (Melanie Mitchell) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Artificial-Intelligence-Guide-Thinking-Humans/dp/B07YBHNM1C/?&_encoding=UTF8&tag=mlst00-21&linkCode=ur2&linkId=44ccac78973f47e59d745e94967c0f30&camp=1634&creative=6738 Complexity: A Guided Tour (Melanie Mitchell) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Audible-Complexity-A-Guided-Tour?&_encoding=UTF8&tag=mlst00-21&linkCode=ur2&linkId=3f8bd505d86865c50c02dd7f10b27c05&camp=1634&creative=6738

Show notes (transcript, full references etc)

https://atlantic-papyrus-d68.notion.site/Melanie-Mitchell-2-0-15e212560e8e445d8b0131712bad3000?pvs=25

YT version: https://youtu.be/29gkDpR2orc

We explore connections between FEP and enactivism, including tensions raised in a paper critiquing FEP from an enactivist perspective.

Dr. Maxwell Ramstead provides background on enactivism emerging from autopoiesis, with a focus on embodied cognition and rejecting information processing/computational views of mind.

Chris shares his journey from robotics into FEP, starting as a skeptic but becoming convinced it's the right framework. He notes there are both "high road" and "low road" versions, ranging from embodied to more radically anti-representational stances. He doesn't see a definitive fork between dynamical systems and information theory as the source of conflict. Rather, the notion of operational closure in enactivism seems to be the main sticking point.

The group explores definitional issues around structure/organization, boundaries, and operational closure. Maxwell argues the generative model in FEP captures organizational dependencies akin to operational closure. The Markov blanket formalism models structural interfaces.

We discuss the concept of goals in cognitive systems - Chris advocates an intentional stance perspective - using notions of goals/intentions if they help explain system dynamics. Goals emerge from beliefs about dynamical trajectories. Prof Friston provides an elegant explanation of how goal-directed behavior naturally falls out of the FEP mathematics in a particular "goldilocks" regime of system scale/dynamics. The conversation explores the idea that many systems simply act "as if" they have goals or models, without necessarily possessing explicit representations. This helps resolve tensions between enactivist and computational perspectives.

Throughout the dialogue, Maxwell presses philosophical points about the FEP abolishing what he perceives as false dichotomies in cognitive science such as internalism/externalism. He is critical of enactivists' commitment to bright line divides between subject areas.

Prof. Karl Friston - Inventor of the free energy principle https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=q_4u0aoAAAAJ

Prof. Chris Buckley - Professor of Neural Computation at Sussex University https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=nWuZ0XcAAAAJ&hl=en

Dr. Maxwell Ramstead - Director of Research at VERSES https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=ILpGOMkAAAAJ&hl=fr

We address critique in this paper:

Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle (Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, Evan Thompson, Randall D. Beere)

https://philosophymindscience.org/index.php/phimisci/article/download/9187/8975

Other refs:

Multiscale integration: beyond internalism and externalism (Maxwell J D Ramstead)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33627890/

MLST panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe and Dr. Keith Duggar

TOC (auto generated): 0:00 - Introduction 0:41 - Defining enactivism and its variants 6:58 - The source of the conflict between dynamical systems and information theory 8:56 - Operational closure in enactivism 10:03 - Goals and intentions 12:35 - The link between dynamical systems and information theory 15:02 - Path integrals and non-equilibrium dynamics 18:38 - Operational closure defined 21:52 - Structure vs. organization in enactivism 24:24 - Markov blankets as interfaces 28:48 - Operational closure in FEP 30:28 - Structure and organization again 31:08 - Dynamics vs. information theory 33:55 - Goals and intentions emerge in the FEP mathematics 36:58 - The Good Regulator Theorem 49:30 - enactivism and its relation to ecological psychology 52:00 - Goals, intentions and beliefs 55:21 - Boundaries and meaning 58:55 - Enactivism's rejection of information theory 1:02:08 - Beliefs vs goals 1:05:06 - Ecological psychology and FEP 1:08:41 - The Good Regulator Theorem 1:18:38 - How goal-directed behavior emerges 1:23:13 - Ontological vs metaphysical boundaries 1:25:20 - Boundaries as maps 1:31:08 - Connections to the maximum entropy principle 1:33:45 - Relations to quantum and relational physics

Please check out Numerai - our sponsor @ http://numer.ai/mlst Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB The Second Law: Resolving the Mystery of the Second Law of Thermodynamics Buy Stephen's book here - https://tinyurl.com/2jj2t9wa The Language Game: How Improvisation Created Language and Changed the World by Morten H. Christiansen and Nick Chater Buy here: https://tinyurl.com/35bvs8be Stephen Wolfram starts by discussing the second law of thermodynamics - the idea that entropy, or disorder, tends to increase over time. He talks about how this law seems intuitively true, but has been difficult to prove. Wolfram outlines his decades-long quest to fully understand the second law, including failed early attempts to simulate particles mixing as a 12-year-old. He explains how irreversibility arises from the computational irreducibility of underlying physical processes coupled with our limited ability as observers to do the computations needed to "decrypt" the microscopic details. The conversation then shifts to discussing language and how concepts allow us to communicate shared ideas between minds positioned in different parts of "rule space." Wolfram talks about the successes and limitations of using large language models to generate Wolfram Language code from natural language prompts. He sees it as a useful tool for getting started programming, but one still needs human refinement. The final part of the conversation focuses on AI safety and governance. Wolfram notes uncontrolled actuation is where things can go wrong with AI systems. He discusses whether AI agents could have intrinsic experiences and goals, how we might build trust networks between AIs, and that managing a system of many AIs may be easier than a single AI. Wolfram emphasizes the need for more philosophical depth in thinking about AI aims, and draws connections between potential solutions and his work on computational irreducibility and physics. Show notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hXNHtvv8KDR7PxCfMh9xOiDFhU3SVDW8ijyxeTq9LHo/edit?usp=sharing Pod version: TBA https://twitter.com/stephen_wolfram TOC: 00:00:00 - Introduction 00:02:34 - Second law book 00:14:01 - Reversibility / entropy / observers / equivalence 00:34:22 - Concepts/language in the ruliad 00:49:04 - Comparison to free energy principle 00:53:58 - ChatGPT / Wolfram / Language 01:00:17 - AI risk Panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe @ecsquendor / Dr. Keith Duggar @DoctorDuggar

Please check out Numerai - our sponsor @ http://numer.ai/mlst Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB Professor Jürgen Schmidhuber, the father of artificial intelligence, joins us today. Schmidhuber discussed the history of machine learning, the current state of AI, and his career researching recursive self-improvement, artificial general intelligence and its risks. Schmidhuber pointed out the importance of studying the history of machine learning to properly assign credit for key breakthroughs. He discussed some of the earliest machine learning algorithms. He also highlighted the foundational work of Leibniz, who discovered the chain rule that enables training of deep neural networks, and the ancient Antikythera mechanism, the first known gear-based computer. Schmidhuber discussed limits to recursive self-improvement and artificial general intelligence, including physical constraints like the speed of light and what can be computed. He noted we have no evidence the human brain can do more than traditional computing. Schmidhuber sees humankind as a potential stepping stone to more advanced, spacefaring machine life which may have little interest in humanity. However, he believes commercial incentives point AGI development towards being beneficial and that open-source innovation can help to achieve "AI for all" symbolised by his company's motto "AI∀". Schmidhuber discussed approaches he believes will lead to more general AI, including meta-learning, reinforcement learning, building predictive world models, and curiosity-driven learning. His "fast weight programming" approach from the 1990s involved one network altering another network's connections. This was actually the first Transformer variant, now called an unnormalised linear Transformer. He also described the first GANs in 1990, to implement artificial curiosity. Schmidhuber reflected on his career researching AI. He said his fondest memories were gaining insights that seemed to solve longstanding problems, though new challenges always arose: "then for a brief moment it looks like the greatest thing since sliced bread and and then you get excited ... but then suddenly you realize, oh, it's still not finished. Something important is missing.” Since 1985 he has worked on systems that can recursively improve themselves, constrained only by the limits of physics and computability. He believes continual progress, shaped by both competition and collaboration, will lead to increasingly advanced AI. On AI Risk: Schmidhuber: "To me it's indeed weird. Now there are all these letters coming out warning of the dangers of AI. And I think some of the guys who are writing these letters, they are just seeking attention because they know that AI dystopia are attracting more attention than documentaries about the benefits of AI in healthcare." Schmidhuber believes we should be more concerned with existing threats like nuclear weapons than speculative risks from advanced AI. He said: "As far as I can judge, all of this cannot be stopped but it can be channeled in a very natural way that is good for humankind...there is a tremendous bias towards good AI, meaning AI that is good for humans...I am much more worried about 60 year old technology that can wipe out civilization within two hours, without any AI.”

[this is truncated, read show notes]

YT: https://youtu.be/q27XMPm5wg8

Show notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13-vIetOvhceZq5XZnELRbaazpQbxLbf5Yi7M25CixEE/edit?usp=sharing Note: Interview was recorded 15th June 2023. https://twitter.com/SchmidhuberAI Panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe @ecsquendor / Dr. Keith Duggar @DoctorDuggar Pod version: TBA TOC: [00:00:00] Intro / Numerai [00:00:51] Show Kick Off [00:02:24] Credit Assignment in ML [00:12:51] XRisk [00:20:45] First Transformer variant of 1991 [00:47:20] Which Current Approaches are Good [00:52:42] Autonomy / Curiosity [00:58:42] GANs of 1990 [01:11:29] OpenAI, Moats, Legislation

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB

George Hotz and Connor Leahy discuss the crucial challenge of developing beneficial AI that is aligned with human values. Hotz believes truly aligned AI is impossible, while Leahy argues it's a solvable technical challenge.
Hotz contends that AI will inevitably pursue power, but distributing AI widely would prevent any single AI from dominating. He advocates open-sourcing AI developments to democratize access. Leahy counters that alignment is necessary to ensure AIs respect human values. Without solving alignment, general AI could ignore or harm humans.
They discuss whether AI's tendency to seek power stems from optimization pressure or human-instilled goals. Leahy argues goal-seeking behavior naturally emerges while Hotz believes it reflects human values. Though agreeing on AI's potential dangers, they differ on solutions. Hotz favors accelerating AI progress and distributing capabilities while Leahy wants safeguards put in place.
While acknowledging risks like AI-enabled weapons, they debate whether broad access or restrictions better manage threats. Leahy suggests limiting dangerous knowledge, but Hotz insists openness checks government overreach. They concur that coordination and balance of power are key to navigating the AI revolution. Both eagerly anticipate seeing whose ideas prevail as AI progresses.

Transcript and notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1smkmBY7YqcrhejdbqJOoZHq-59LZVwu-DNdM57IgFcU/edit?usp=sharing

Note: this is not a normal episode i.e. the hosts are not part of the debate (and for the record don't agree with Connor or George).

TOC: [00:00:00] Introduction to George Hotz and Connor Leahy [00:03:10] George Hotz's Opening Statement: Intelligence and Power [00:08:50] Connor Leahy's Opening Statement: Technical Problem of Alignment and Coordination [00:15:18] George Hotz's Response: Nature of Cooperation and Individual Sovereignty [00:17:32] Discussion on individual sovereignty and defense [00:18:45] Debate on living conditions in America versus Somalia [00:21:57] Talk on the nature of freedom and the aesthetics of life [00:24:02] Discussion on the implications of coordination and conflict in politics [00:33:41] Views on the speed of AI development / hard takeoff [00:35:17] Discussion on potential dangers of AI [00:36:44] Discussion on the effectiveness of current AI [00:40:59] Exploration of potential risks in technology [00:45:01] Discussion on memetic mutation risk [00:52:36] AI alignment and exploitability [00:53:13] Superintelligent AIs and the assumption of good intentions [00:54:52] Humanity’s inconsistency and AI alignment [00:57:57] Stability of the world and the impact of superintelligent AIs [01:02:30] Personal utopia and the limitations of AI alignment [01:05:10] Proposed regulation on limiting the total number of flops [01:06:20] Having access to a powerful AI system [01:18:00] Power dynamics and coordination issues with AI [01:25:44] Humans vs AI in Optimization [01:27:05] The Impact of AI's Power Seeking Behavior [01:29:32] A Debate on the Future of AI

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB Join us for a fascinating discussion of the free energy principle with Dr. Maxwell Ramsted, a leading thinker exploring the intersection of math, physics, and philosophy and Director of Research at VERSES. The FEP was proposed by renowned neuroscientist Karl Friston, this principle offers a unifying theory explaining how systems maintain order and their identity. The free energy principle inverts traditional survival logic. Rather than asking what behaviors promote survival, it queries - given things exist, what must they do? The answer: minimizing free energy, or "surprise." Systems persist by constantly ensuring their internal states match anticipated states based on a model of the world. Failure to minimize surprise leads to chaos as systems dissolve into disorder. Thus, the free energy principle elucidates why lifeforms relentlessly model and predict their surroundings. It is an existential imperative counterbalancing entropy. Essentially, this principle describes the mind's pursuit of harmony between expectations and reality. Its relevance spans from cells to societies, underlying order wherever longevity is found. Our discussion explores the technical details and philosophical implications of this paradigm-shifting theory. How does it further our understanding of cognition and intelligence? What insights does it offer about the fundamental patterns and properties of existence? Can it precipitate breakthroughs in disciplines like neuroscience and artificial intelligence? Dr. Ramstead completed his Ph.D. at McGill University in Montreal, Canada in 2019, with frequent research visits to UCL in London, under the supervision of the world’s most cited neuroscientist, Professor Karl Friston (UCL).

YT version: https://youtu.be/8qb28P7ksyE https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=ILpGOMkAAAAJ&hl=frhttps://spatialwebfoundation.org/team/maxwell-ramstead/https://www.linkedin.com/in/maxwell-ramstead-43a1991b7/https://twitter.com/mjdramstead VERSES AI: https://www.verses.ai/ Intro: Tim Scarfe (Ph.D) Interviewer: Keith Duggar (Ph.D MIT) TOC: 0:00:00 - Tim Intro 0:08:10 - Intro and philosophy 0:14:26 - Intro to Maxwell 0:18:00 - FEP 0:29:08 - Markov Blankets 0:51:15 - Verses AI / Applications of FEP 1:05:55 - Potential issues with deploying FEP 1:10:50 - Shared knowledge graphs 1:14:29 - XRisk / Ethics 1:24:57 - Strength of Verses 1:28:30 - Misconceptions about FEP, Physics vs philosophy/criticism 1:44:41 - Emergence / consciousness References: Principia Mathematica https://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=30567249049 Andy Clark's paper "Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science" (Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2013) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23663408/ "Math Does Not Represent" by Erik Curiel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA_T20HAzyY A free energy principle for generic quantum systems (Chris Fields et al) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.15242.pdf Designing explainable artificial intelligence with active inference https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04025 Am I Self-Conscious? (Friston) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00579/full The Meta-Problem of Consciousness https://philarchive.org/archive/CHATMO-32v1 The Map-Territory Fallacy Fallacy https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.06924 A Technical Critique of Some Parts of the Free Energy Principle - Martin Biehl et al https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.06408 WEAK MARKOV BLANKETS IN HIGH-DIMENSIONAL, SPARSELY-COUPLED RANDOM DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS - DALTON A R SAKTHIVADIVEL https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.07620.pdf

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst

Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB

The discussion between Tim Scarfe and David Foster provided an in-depth critique of the arguments made by panelists at the Munk AI Debate on whether artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to humanity. While the panelists made thought-provoking points, Scarfe and Foster found their arguments largely speculative, lacking crucial details and evidence to support claims of an impending existential threat.

Scarfe and Foster strongly disagreed with Max Tegmark’s position that AI has an unparalleled “blast radius” that could lead to human extinction. Tegmark failed to provide a credible mechanism for how this scenario would unfold in reality. His arguments relied more on speculation about advanced future technologies than on present capabilities and trends. As Foster argued, we cannot conclude AI poses a threat based on speculation alone. Evidence is needed to ground discussions of existential risks in science rather than science fiction fantasies or doomsday scenarios.

They found Yann LeCun’s statements too broad and high-level, critiquing him for not providing sufficiently strong arguments or specifics to back his position. While LeCun aptly noted AI remains narrow in scope and far from achieving human-level intelligence, his arguments lacked crucial details on current limitations and why we should not fear superintelligence emerging in the near future. As Scarfe argued, without these details the discussion descended into “philosophy” rather than focusing on evidence and data.

Scarfe and Foster also took issue with Yoshua Bengio’s unsubstantiated speculation that machines would necessarily develop a desire for self-preservation that threatens humanity. There is no evidence today’s AI systems are developing human-like general intelligence or desires, let alone that these attributes would manifest in ways dangerous to humans. The question is not whether machines will eventually surpass human intelligence, but how and when this might realistically unfold based on present technological capabilities. Bengio’s arguments relied more on speculation about advanced future technologies than on evidence from current systems and research.

In contrast, they strongly agreed with Melanie Mitchell’s view that scenarios of malevolent or misguided superintelligence are speculation, not backed by evidence from AI as it exists today. Claims of an impending “existential threat” from AI are overblown, harmful to progress, and inspire undue fear of technology rather than consideration of its benefits. Mitchell sensibly argued discussions of risks from emerging technologies must be grounded in science and data, not speculation, if we are to make balanced policy and development decisions.

Overall, while the debate raised thought-provoking questions about advanced technologies that could eventually transform our world, none of the speakers made a credible evidence-based case that today’s AI poses an existential threat. Scarfe and Foster argued the debate failed to discuss concrete details about current capabilities and limitations of technologies like language models, which remain narrow in scope. General human-level AI is still missing many components, including physical embodiment, emotions, and the "common sense" reasoning that underlies human thinking. Claims of existential threats require extraordinary evidence to justify policy or research restrictions, not speculation. By discussing possibilities rather than probabilities grounded in evidence, the debate failed to substantively advance our thinking on risks from AI and its plausible development in the coming decades.

David's new podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-ai-canvas/id1692538973

Generative AI book: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/generative-deep-learning/9781098134174/

Sponsored Episode - YouAi What if an AI truly knew you—your thoughts, values, aptitudes, and dreams? An AI that could enhance your life in profound ways by amplifying your strengths, augmenting your weaknesses, and connecting you with like-minded souls. That is the vision of YouAi. YouAi founder Dmitri Shapiro believes digitizing our inner lives could unlock tremendous benefits. But mapping the human psyche also poses deep questions. As technology mediates our self-understanding, what risks rendering our minds in bits and algorithms? Could we gain a new means of flourishing or lose something intangible? There are no easy answers, but YouAi offers a vision balanced by hard thinking. Shapiro discussed YouAi's app, which builds personalized AI assistants by learning how individuals think through interactive questions. As people share, YouAi develops a multidimensional model of their mind. Users get a tailored feed of prompts to continue engaging and teaching their AI. YouAi's vision provides a glimpse into a future that could unsettle or fulfill our hopes. As technology mediates understanding ourselves and others, will we risk losing what makes us human or find new means of flourishing? YouAI believes that together, we can build a future where our minds contain infinite potential—and their technology helps unlock it. But we must proceed thoughtfully, upholding human dignity above all else. Our minds shape who we are. And who we can become.Digitise your mind today: YouAi - https://YouAi.aiMIndStudio – https://YouAi.ai/mindstudioYouAi Mind Indexer - https://YouAi.ai/trainJoin the MLST discord and register for the YouAi event on July 13th: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB TOC: 0:00:00 - Introduction to Mind Digitization 0:09:31 - The YouAi Platform and Personal Applications 0:27:54 - The Potential of Group Alignment 0:30:28 - Applications in Human-to-Human Communication 0:35:43 - Applications in Interfacing with Digital Technology 0:43:41 - Introduction to the Project 0:44:51 - Brain digitization and mind vs. brain 0:49:55 - The Extended Mind and Neurofeedback 0:54:16 - Personalized Learning and the Future of Education 1:02:19 - Privacy and Data Security 1:14:20 - Ethical Considerations of Digitizing the Mind 1:19:49 - The Metaverse and the Future of Digital Identity 1:25:17 - Digital Immortality and Legacy 1:29:09 - The Nature of Consciousness 1:34:11 - Digitization of the Mind 1:35:06 - Potential Inequality in a Digital World 1:38:00 - The Role of Technology in Equalizing or Democratizing Society 1:40:51 - The Future of the Startup and Community Involvement

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk The first 10 mins of audio from Joscha isn't great, it improves after.

Transcript and longer summary: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TUJhlSVbrHf2vWoe6p7xL5tlTK_BGZ140QqqTudF8UI/edit?usp=sharing Dr. Joscha Bach argued that general intelligence emerges from civilization, not individuals. Given our biological constraints, humans cannot achieve a high level of general intelligence on our own. Bach believes AGI may become integrated into all parts of the world, including human minds and bodies. He thinks a future where humans and AGI harmoniously coexist is possible if we develop a shared purpose and incentive to align. However, Bach is uncertain about how AI progress will unfold or which scenarios are most likely. Bach argued that global control and regulation of AI is unrealistic. While regulation may address some concerns, it cannot stop continued progress in AI. He believes individuals determine their own values, so "human values" cannot be formally specified and aligned across humanity. For Bach, the possibility of building beneficial AGI is exciting but much work is still needed to ensure a positive outcome. Connor Leahy believes we have more control over the future than the default outcome might suggest. With sufficient time and effort, humanity could develop the technology and coordination to build a beneficial AGI. However, the default outcome likely leads to an undesirable scenario if we do not actively work to build a better future. Leahy thinks finding values and priorities most humans endorse could help align AI, even if individuals disagree on some values. Leahy argued a future where humans and AGI harmoniously coexist is ideal but will require substantial work to achieve. While regulation faces challenges, it remains worth exploring. Leahy believes limits to progress in AI exist but we are unlikely to reach them before humanity is at risk. He worries even modestly superhuman intelligence could disrupt the status quo if misaligned with human values and priorities. Overall, Bach and Leahy expressed optimism about the possibility of building beneficial AGI but believe we must address risks and challenges proactively. They agreed substantial uncertainty remains around how AI will progress and what scenarios are most plausible. But developing a shared purpose between humans and AI, improving coordination and control, and finding human values to help guide progress could all improve the odds of a beneficial outcome. With openness to new ideas and willingness to consider multiple perspectives, continued discussions like this one could help ensure the future of AI is one that benefits and inspires humanity. TOC: 00:00:00 - Introduction and Background 00:02:54 - Different Perspectives on AGI 00:13:59 - The Importance of AGI 00:23:24 - Existential Risks and the Future of Humanity 00:36:21 - Coherence and Coordination in Society 00:40:53 - Possibilities and Future of AGI 00:44:08 - Coherence and alignment 01:08:32 - The role of values in AI alignment 01:18:33 - The future of AGI and merging with AI 01:22:14 - The limits of AI alignment 01:23:06 - The scalability of intelligence 01:26:15 - Closing statements and future prospects

In this wide-ranging conversation, Tim Scarfe interviews Neel Nanda, a researcher at DeepMind working on mechanistic interpretability, which aims to understand the algorithms and representations learned by machine learning models. Neel discusses how models can represent their thoughts using motifs, circuits, and linear directional features which are often communicated via a "residual stream", an information highway models use to pass information between layers.

Neel argues that "superposition", the ability for models to represent more features than they have neurons, is one of the biggest open problems in interpretability. This is because superposition thwarts our ability to understand models by decomposing them into individual units of analysis. Despite this, Neel remains optimistic that ambitious interpretability is possible, citing examples like his work reverse engineering how models do modular addition. However, Neel notes we must start small, build rigorous foundations, and not assume our theoretical frameworks perfectly match reality.

The conversation turns to whether models can have goals or agency, with Neel arguing they likely can based on heuristics like models executing long term plans towards some objective. However, we currently lack techniques to build models with specific goals, meaning any goals would likely be learned or emergent. Neel highlights how induction heads, circuits models use to track long range dependencies, seem crucial for phenomena like in-context learning to emerge.

On the existential risks from AI, Neel believes we should avoid overly confident claims that models will or will not be dangerous, as we do not understand them enough to make confident theoretical assertions. However, models could pose risks through being misused, having undesirable emergent properties, or being imperfectly aligned. Neel argues we must pursue rigorous empirical work to better understand and ensure model safety, avoid "philosophizing" about definitions of intelligence, and focus on ensuring researchers have standards for what it means to decide a system is "safe" before deploying it. Overall, a thoughtful conversation on one of the most important issues of our time.

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Neel Nanda: https://www.neelnanda.io/

TOC

[00:00:00] Introduction and Neel Nanda's Interests (walk and talk)

[00:03:15] Mechanistic Interpretability: Reverse Engineering Neural Networks

[00:13:23] Discord questions

[00:21:16] Main interview kick-off in studio

[00:49:26] Grokking and Sudden Generalization

[00:53:18] The Debate on Systematicity and Compositionality

[01:19:16] How do ML models represent their thoughts

[01:25:51] Do Large Language Models Learn World Models?

[01:53:36] Superposition and Interference in Language Models

[02:43:15] Transformers discussion

[02:49:49] Emergence and In-Context Learning

[03:20:02] Superintelligence/XRisk discussion

Transcript: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FK1OepdJMrqpFK-_1Q3LQN6QLyLBvBwWW_5z8WrS1RI/edit?usp=sharing

Refs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/115dAroX0PzSduKr5F1V4CWggYcqIoSXYBhcxYktCnqY/edit?usp=sharing

Please check out Numerai - our sponsor using our link @

http://numer.ai/mlst

Numerai is a groundbreaking platform which is taking the data science world by storm. Tim has been using Numerai to build state-of-the-art models which predict the stock market, all while being a part of an inspiring community of data scientists from around the globe. They host the Numerai Data Science Tournament, where data scientists like us use their financial dataset to predict future stock market performance.

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

YT version: https://youtu.be/axJtywd9Tbo

In this fascinating interview, Dr. Tim Scarfe speaks with renowned philosopher Daniel Dennett about the potential dangers of AI and the concept of "Counterfeit People." Dennett raises concerns about AI being used to create artificial colleagues, and argues that preventing counterfeit AI individuals is crucial for societal trust and security.

They delve into Dennett's "Two Black Boxes" thought experiment, the Chinese Room Argument by John Searle, and discuss the implications of AI in terms of reversibility, reontologisation, and realism. Dr. Scarfe and Dennett also examine adversarial LLMs, mental trajectories, and the emergence of consciousness and semanticity in AI systems.

Throughout the conversation, they touch upon various philosophical perspectives, including Gilbert Ryle's Ghost in the Machine, Chomsky's work, and the importance of competition in academia. Dennett concludes by highlighting the need for legal and technological barriers to protect against the dangers of counterfeit AI creations.

Join Dr. Tim Scarfe and Daniel Dennett in this thought-provoking discussion about the future of AI and the potential challenges we face in preserving our civilization. Don't miss this insightful conversation!

TOC:

00:00:00 Intro

00:09:56 Main show kick off

00:12:04 Counterfeit People

00:16:03 Reversibility

00:20:55 Reontologisation

00:24:43 Realism

00:27:48 Adversarial LLMs are out to get us

00:32:34 Exploring mental trajectories and Chomsky

00:38:53 Gilbert Ryle and Ghost in machine and competition in academia

00:44:32 2 Black boxes thought experiment / intentional stance

01:00:11 Chinese room

01:04:49 Singularitarianism

01:07:22 Emergence of consciousness and semanticity

References:

Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601

The Problem With Counterfeit People (Daniel Dennett)

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/05/problem-counterfeit-people/674075/

The knowledge argument

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_argument

The Intentional Stance

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271180035_The_Intentional_Stance

Two Black Boxes: a Fable (Daniel Dennett)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28762339_Two_Black_Boxes_a_Fable

The Chinese Room Argument (John Searle)

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/

https://web-archive.southampton.ac.uk/cogprints.org/7150/1/10.1.1.83.5248.pdf

From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds (Daniel Dennett)

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bacteria-Bach-Back-Evolution-Minds/dp/014197804X

Consciousness Explained (Daniel Dennett)

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Consciousness-Explained-Penguin-Science-Dennett/dp/0140128670/

The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul (Hofstadter, Douglas R; Dennett, Daniel C.)

https://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=31494476184

#DanielDennett #ArtificialIntelligence #CounterfeitPeople

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk In this eye-opening discussion between Tim Scarfe and Prof. Jim Hughes, a professor of gene regulation at Oxford University, they explore the intersection of creativity, genomics, and artificial intelligence. Prof. Hughes brings his expertise in genomics and insights from his interdisciplinary research group, which includes machine learning experts, mathematicians, and molecular biologists. The conversation begins with an overview of Prof. Hughes' background and the importance of creativity in scientific research. They delve into the challenges of unlocking the secrets of the human genome and how machine learning, specifically convolutional neural networks, can assist in decoding genome function. As they discuss validation and interpretability concerns in machine learning, they acknowledge the need for experimental tests and ponder the complex nature of understanding the basic code of life. They touch upon the fascinating world of morphogenesis and emergence, considering the potential crossovers into AI and their implications for self-repairing systems in medicine. Examining the ethical and regulatory aspects of genomics and AI, the duo explores the implications of having access to someone's genome, the potential to predict traits or diseases, and the role of AI in understanding complex genetic signals. They also consider the challenges of keeping up with the rapidly expanding body of scientific research and the pressures faced by researchers in academia. To wrap up the discussion, Tim and Prof. Hughes shed light on the significance of creativity and diversity in scientific research, emphasizing the need for divergent processes and diverse perspectives to foster innovation and avoid consensus-driven convergence. Filmed at https://www.creativemachine.io/Prof. Jim Hughes: https://www.rdm.ox.ac.uk/people/jim-hughesDr. Tim Scarfe: https://xrai.glass/ Table of Contents: 1. [0:00:00] Introduction and Prof. Jim Hughes' background 2. [0:02:48] Creativity and its role in science 3. [0:07:13] Challenges in understanding the human genome 4. [0:13:20] Using convolutional neural networks to decode genome function 5. [0:15:32] Validation and interpretability concerns in machine learning 6. [0:17:56] Challenges in understanding the basic code of life 7. [0:19:36] Morphogenesis, emergence, and potential crossovers into AI 8. [0:21:38] Ethics and regulation in genomics and AI 9. [0:23:30] The role of AI in understanding and managing genetic risks 10. [0:32:37] Creativity and diversity in scientific research

Please check out Numerai - our sponsor @

https://numerai.com/mlst

Numerai is a groundbreaking platform which is taking the data science world by storm. Tim has been using Numerai to build state-of-the-art models which predict the stock market, all while being a part of an inspiring community of data scientists from around the globe. They host the Numerai Data Science Tournament, where data scientists like us use their financial dataset to predict future stock market performance.

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Welcome to an exciting episode featuring an outstanding guest, Robert Miles! Renowned for his extraordinary contributions to understanding AI and its potential impacts on our lives, Robert is an artificial intelligence advocate, researcher, and YouTube sensation. He combines engaging discussions with entertaining content, captivating millions of viewers from around the world.

With a strong computer science background, Robert has been actively involved in AI safety projects, focusing on raising awareness about potential risks and benefits of advanced AI systems. His YouTube channel is celebrated for making AI safety discussions accessible to a diverse audience through breaking down complex topics into easy-to-understand nuggets of knowledge, and you might also recognise him from his appearances on Computerphile.

In this episode, join us as we dive deep into Robert's journey in the world of AI, exploring his insights on AI alignment, superintelligence, and the role of AI shaping our society and future. We'll discuss topics such as the limits of AI capabilities and physics, AI progress and timelines, human-machine hybrid intelligence, AI in conflict and cooperation with humans, and the convergence of AI communities.

Robert Miles:

@RobertMilesAI

https://twitter.com/robertskmiles

https://aisafety.info/

YT version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMLKbhY0ji0

Panel:

Dr. Tim Scarfe

Dr. Keith Duggar

Joint CTOs - https://xrai.glass/

Refs:

Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage? (Rylan Schaeffer)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004

TOC:

Intro [00:00:00]

Numerai Sponsor Messsage [00:02:17]

AI Alignment [00:04:27]

Limits of AI Capabilities and Physics [00:18:00]

AI Progress and Timelines [00:23:52]

AI Arms Race and Innovation [00:31:11]

Human-Machine Hybrid Intelligence [00:38:30]

Understanding and Defining Intelligence [00:42:48]

AI in Conflict and Cooperation with Humans [00:50:13]

Interpretability and Mind Reading in AI [01:03:46]

Mechanistic Interpretability and Deconfusion Research [01:05:53]

Understanding the core concepts of AI [01:07:40]

Moon landing analogy and AI alignment [01:09:42]

Cognitive horizon and limits of human intelligence [01:11:42]

Funding and focus on AI alignment [01:16:18]

Regulating AI technology and potential risks [01:19:17]

Aligning AI with human values and its dynamic nature [01:27:04]

Cooperation and Allyship [01:29:33]

Orthogonality Thesis and Goal Preservation [01:33:15]

Anthropomorphic Language and Intelligent Agents [01:35:31]

Maintaining Variety and Open-ended Existence [01:36:27]

Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models [01:39:22]

Convergence vs Emergence [01:44:04]

Criticism of X-risk and Alignment Communities [01:49:40]

Fusion of AI communities and addressing biases [01:52:51]

AI systems integration into society and understanding them [01:53:29]

Changing opinions on AI topics and learning from past videos [01:54:23]

Utility functions and von Neumann-Morgenstern theorems [01:54:47]

AI Safety FAQ project [01:58:06]

Building a conversation agent using AI safety dataset [02:00:36]

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

In a historic and candid Senate hearing, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Professor Gary Marcus, and IBM's Christina Montgomery discussed the regulatory landscape of AI in the US. The discussion was particularly interesting due to its timing, as it followed the recent release of the EU's proposed AI Act, which could potentially ban American companies like OpenAI and Google from providing API access to generative AI models and impose massive fines for non-compliance.

The speakers openly addressed potential risks of AI technology and emphasized the need for precision regulation. This was a unique approach, as historically, US companies have tried their hardest to avoid regulation. The hearing not only showcased the willingness of industry leaders to engage in discussions on regulation but also demonstrated the need for a balanced approach to avoid stifling innovation.

The EU AI Act, scheduled to come into power in 2026, is still just a proposal, but it has already raised concerns about its impact on the American tech ecosystem and potential conflicts between US and EU laws. With extraterritorial jurisdiction and provisions targeting open-source developers and software distributors like GitHub, the Act could create more problems than it solves by encouraging unsafe AI practices and limiting access to advanced AI technologies.

One core issue with the Act is the designation of foundation models in the highest risk category, primarily due to their open-ended nature. A significant risk theme revolves around users creating harmful content and determining who should be held accountable – the users or the platforms. The Senate hearing served as an essential platform to discuss these pressing concerns and work towards a regulatory framework that promotes both safety and innovation in AI.

00:00 Show

01:35 Legals

03:44 Intro

10:33 Altman intro

14:16 Christina Montgomery

18:20 Gary Marcus

23:15 Jobs

26:01 Scorecards

28:08 Harmful content

29:47 Startups

31:35 What meets the definition of harmful?

32:08 Moratorium

36:11 Social Media

46:17 Gary's take on BingGPT and pivot into policy

48:05 Democratisation

Generative Deep Learning, 2nd Edition [David Foster]

https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/generative-deep-learning/9781098134174/

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

In this conversation, Tim Scarfe and David Foster, the author of 'Generative Deep Learning,' dive deep into the world of generative AI, discussing topics ranging from model families and auto regressive models to the democratization of AI technology and its potential impact on various industries. They explore the connection between language and true intelligence, as well as the limitations of GPT and other large language models. The discussion also covers the importance of task-independent world models, the concept of active inference, and the potential of combining these ideas with transformer and GPT-style models.

Ethics and regulation in AI development are also discussed, including the need for transparency in data used to train AI models and the responsibility of developers to ensure their creations are not destructive. The conversation touches on the challenges posed by AI-generated content on copyright laws and the diminishing role of effort and skill in copyright due to generative models.

The impact of AI on education and creativity is another key area of discussion, with Tim and David exploring the potential benefits and drawbacks of using AI in the classroom, the need for a balance between traditional learning methods and AI-assisted learning, and the importance of teaching students to use AI tools critically and responsibly.

Generative AI in music is also explored, with David and Tim discussing the potential for AI-generated music to change the way we create and consume art, as well as the challenges in training AI models to generate music that captures human emotions and experiences.

Throughout the conversation, Tim and David touch on the potential risks and consequences of AI becoming too powerful, the importance of maintaining control over the technology, and the possibility of government intervention and regulation. The discussion concludes with a thought experiment about AI predicting human actions and creating transient capabilities that could lead to doom.

TOC:

Introducing Generative Deep Learning [00:00:00]

Model Families in Generative Modeling [00:02:25]

Auto Regressive Models and Recurrence [00:06:26]

Language and True Intelligence [00:15:07]

Language, Reality, and World Models [00:19:10]

AI, Human Experience, and Understanding [00:23:09]

GPTs Limitations and World Modeling [00:27:52]

Task-Independent Modeling and Cybernetic Loop [00:33:55]

Collective Intelligence and Emergence [00:36:01]

Active Inference vs. Reinforcement Learning [00:38:02]

Combining Active Inference with Transformers [00:41:55]

Decentralized AI and Collective Intelligence [00:47:46]

Regulation and Ethics in AI Development [00:53:59]

AI-Generated Content and Copyright Laws [00:57:06]

Effort, Skill, and AI Models in Copyright [00:57:59]

AI Alignment and Scale of AI Models [00:59:51]

Democratization of AI: GPT-3 and GPT-4 [01:03:20]

Context Window Size and Vector Databases [01:10:31]

Attention Mechanisms and Hierarchies [01:15:04]

Benefits and Limitations of Language Models [01:16:04]

AI in Education: Risks and Benefits [01:19:41]

AI Tools and Critical Thinking in the Classroom [01:29:26]

Impact of Language Models on Assessment and Creativity [01:35:09]

Generative AI in Music and Creative Arts [01:47:55]

Challenges and Opportunities in Generative Music [01:52:11]

AI-Generated Music and Human Emotions [01:54:31]

Language Modeling vs. Music Modeling [02:01:58]

Democratization of AI and Industry Impact [02:07:38]

Recursive Self-Improving Superintelligence [02:12:48]

AI Technologies: Positive and Negative Impacts [02:14:44]

Runaway AGI and Control Over AI [02:20:35]

AI Dangers, Cybercrime, and Ethics [02:23:42]

https://www.perplexity.ai/

https://www.perplexity.ai/iphone

https://www.perplexity.ai/android Interview with Aravind Srinivas, CEO and Co-Founder of Perplexity AI – Revolutionizing Learning with Conversational Search Engines Dr. Tim Scarfe talks with Dr. Aravind Srinivas, CEO and Co-Founder of Perplexity AI, about his journey from studying AI and reinforcement learning at UC Berkeley to launching Perplexity – a startup that aims to revolutionize learning through the power of conversational search engines. By combining the strengths of large language models like GPT-* with search engines, Perplexity provides users with direct answers to their questions in a decluttered user interface, making the learning process not only more efficient but also enjoyable. Aravind shares his insights on how advertising can be made more relevant and less intrusive with the help of large language models, emphasizing the importance of transparency in relevance ranking to improve user experience. He also discusses the challenge of balancing the interests of users and advertisers for long-term success. The interview delves into the challenges of maintaining truthfulness and balancing opinions and facts in a world where algorithmic truth is difficult to achieve. Aravind believes that opinionated models can be useful as long as they don't spread misinformation and are transparent about being opinions. He also emphasizes the importance of allowing users to correct or update information, making the platform more adaptable and dynamic. Lastly, Aravind shares his thoughts on embracing a digital society with large language models, stressing the need for frequent and iterative deployments of these models to reduce fear of AI and misinformation. He envisions a future where using AI tools effectively requires clear thinking and first-principle reasoning, ultimately benefiting society as a whole. Education and transparency are crucial to counter potential misuse of AI for political or malicious purposes.

YT version: https://youtu.be/_vMOWw3uYvk Aravind Srinivas: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aravind-srinivas-16051987/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=GhrKC1gAAAAJ&hl=en

https://twitter.com/aravsrinivas?lang=en Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe (CTO XRAI Glass) Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB TOC: Introduction and Background of Perplexity AI [00:00:00]

The Importance of a Decluttered UI and User Experience [00:04:19]

Advertising in Search Engines and Potential Improvements [00:09:02]

Challenges and Opportunities in this new Search Modality [00:18:17]

Benefits of Perplexity and Personalized Learning [00:21:27]

Objective Truth and Personalized Wikipedia [00:26:34]

Opinions and Truth in Answer Engines [00:30:53]

Embracing the Digital Society with Language Models [00:37:30]

Impact on Jobs and Future of Learning [00:40:13]

Educating users on when perplexity works and doesn't work [00:43:13]

Improving user experience and the possibilities of voice-to-voice interaction [00:45:04]

The future of language models and auto-regressive models [00:49:51]

Performance of GPT-4 and potential improvements [00:52:31]

Building the ultimate research and knowledge assistant [00:55:33]

Revolutionizing note-taking and personal knowledge stores [00:58:16] References: Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines (Nelson F. Liu et al, Stanford University) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.09848.pdf Note: this was a sponsored interview.

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

In this exclusive interview, Dr. Tim Scarfe sits down with Minqi Jiang, a leading PhD student at University College London and Meta AI, as they delve into the fascinating world of deep reinforcement learning (RL) and its impact on technology, startups, and research. Discover how Minqi made the crucial decision to pursue a PhD in this exciting field, and learn from his valuable startup experiences and lessons.

Minqi shares his insights into balancing serendipity and planning in life and research, and explains the role of objectives and Goodhart's Law in decision-making. Get ready to explore the depths of robustness in RL, two-player zero-sum games, and the differences between RL and supervised learning.

As they discuss the role of environment in intelligence, emergence, and abstraction, prepare to be blown away by the possibilities of open-endedness and the intelligence explosion. Learn how language models generate their own training data, the limitations of RL, and the future of software 2.0 with interpretability concerns.

From robotics and open-ended learning applications to learning potential metrics and MDPs, this interview is a goldmine of information for anyone interested in AI, RL, and the cutting edge of technology. Don't miss out on this incredible opportunity to learn from a rising star in the AI world!

TOC

Tech & Startup Background [00:00:00]

Pursuing PhD in Deep RL [00:03:59]

Startup Lessons [00:11:33]

Serendipity vs Planning [00:12:30]

Objectives & Decision Making [00:19:19]

Minimax Regret & Uncertainty [00:22:57]

Robustness in RL & Zero-Sum Games [00:26:14]

RL vs Supervised Learning [00:34:04]

Exploration & Intelligence [00:41:27]

Environment, Emergence, Abstraction [00:46:31]

Open-endedness & Intelligence Explosion [00:54:28]

Language Models & Training Data [01:04:59]

RLHF & Language Models [01:16:37]

Creativity in Language Models [01:27:25]

Limitations of RL [01:40:58]

Software 2.0 & Interpretability [01:45:11]

Language Models & Code Reliability [01:48:23]

Robust Prioritized Level Replay [01:51:42]

Open-ended Learning [01:55:57]

Auto-curriculum & Deep RL [02:08:48]

Robotics & Open-ended Learning [02:31:05]

Learning Potential & MDPs [02:36:20]

Universal Function Space [02:42:02]

Goal-Directed Learning & Auto-Curricula [02:42:48]

Advice & Closing Thoughts [02:44:47]

References:

- Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective by Kenneth O. Stanley and Joel Lehman

https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319155234

- Rethinking Exploration: General Intelligence Requires Rethinking Exploration

https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06860

- The Case for Strong Emergence (Sabine Hossenfelder)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.07740

- The Game of Life (Conway)

https://www.conwaylife.com/

- Toolformer: Teaching Language Models to Generate APIs (Meta AI)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761

- OpenAI's POET: Paired Open-Ended Trailblazer

https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.01753

- Schmidhuber's Artificial Curiosity

https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/interest.html

- Gödel Machines

https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/goedelmachine.html

- PowerPlay

https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.5309

- Robust Prioritized Level Replay: https://openreview.net/forum?id=NfZ6g2OmXEk

- Unsupervised Environment Design: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02096

- Excel: Evolving Curriculum Learning for Deep Reinforcement Learning

https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05431

- Go-Explore: A New Approach for Hard-Exploration Problems

https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10995

- Learning with AMIGo: Adversarially Motivated Intrinsic Goals

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342377312_Learning_with_AMIGo_Adversarially_Motivated_Intrinsic_Goals

PRML

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2006/01/Bishop-Pattern-Recognition-and-Machine-Learning-2006.pdf

Sutton and Barto

https://web.stanford.edu/class/psych209/Readings/SuttonBartoIPRLBook2ndEd.pdf

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mlst

Discord: https://discord.gg/ESrGqhf5CB

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk

Chris Eliasmith is a renowned interdisciplinary researcher, author, and professor at the University of Waterloo, where he holds the prestigious Canada Research Chair in Theoretical Neuroscience. As the Founding Director of the Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience, Eliasmith leads the Computational Neuroscience Research Group in exploring the mysteries of the brain and its complex functions. His groundbreaking work, including the Neural Engineering Framework, Neural Engineering Objects software environment, and the Semantic Pointer Architecture, has led to the development of Spaun, the most advanced functional brain simulation to date. Among his numerous achievements, Eliasmith has received the 2015 NSERC "Polany-ee" Award and authored two influential books, "How to Build a Brain" and "Neural Engineering."

Chris' homepage:

http://arts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/

Interviewers: Dr. Tim Scarfe and Dr. Keith Duggar

TOC:

Intro to Chris [00:00:00]

Continuous Representation in Biologically Plausible Neural Networks [00:06:49]

Legendre Memory Unit and Spatial Semantic Pointer [00:14:36]

Large Contexts and Data in Language Models [00:20:30]

Spatial Semantic Pointers and Continuous Representations [00:24:38]

Auto Convolution [00:30:12]

Abstractions and the Continuity [00:36:33]

Compression, Sparsity, and Brain Representations [00:42:52]

Continual Learning and Real-World Interactions [00:48:05]

Robust Generalization in LLMs and Priors [00:56:11]

Chip design [01:00:41]

Chomsky + Computational Power of NNs and Recursion [01:04:02]

Spiking Neural Networks and Applications [01:13:07]

Limits of Empirical Learning [01:22:43]

Philosophy of Mind, Consciousness etc [01:25:35]

Future of human machine interaction [01:41:28]

Future research and advice to young researchers [01:45:06]

Refs:

http://compneuro.uwaterloo.ca/publications/dumont2023.html 

http://compneuro.uwaterloo.ca/publications/voelker2019lmu.html 

http://compneuro.uwaterloo.ca/publications/voelker2018.html

http://compneuro.uwaterloo.ca/publications/lu2019.html 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5h-xjddzlY

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 In this podcast with the legendary Connor Leahy (CEO Conjecture) recorded in Dec 2022, we discuss various topics related to artificial intelligence (AI), including AI alignment, the success of ChatGPT, the potential threats of artificial general intelligence (AGI), and the challenges of balancing research and product development at his company, Conjecture. He emphasizes the importance of empathy, dehumanizing our thinking to avoid anthropomorphic biases, and the value of real-world experiences in learning and personal growth. The conversation also covers the Orthogonality Thesis, AI preferences, the mystery of mode collapse, and the paradox of AI alignment. Connor Leahy expresses concern about the rapid development of AI and the potential dangers it poses, especially as AI systems become more powerful and integrated into society. He argues that we need a better understanding of AI systems to ensure their safe and beneficial development. The discussion also touches on the concept of "futuristic whack-a-mole," where futurists predict potential AGI threats, and others try to come up with solutions for those specific scenarios. However, the problem lies in the fact that there could be many more scenarios that neither party can think of, especially when dealing with a system that's smarter than humans. https://www.linkedin.com/in/connor-j-leahy/https://twitter.com/NPCollapse Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe (Innovation CTO @ XRAI Glass https://xrai.glass/) TOC: The success of ChatGPT and its impact on the AI field [00:00:00] Subjective experience [00:15:12] AI Architectural discussion including RLHF [00:18:04] The paradox of AI alignment and the future of AI in society [00:31:44] The impact of AI on society and politics [00:36:11] Future shock levels and the challenges of predicting the future [00:45:58] Long termism and existential risk [00:48:23] Consequentialism vs. deontology in rationalism [00:53:39] The Rationalist Community and its Challenges [01:07:37] AI Alignment and Conjecture [01:14:15] Orthogonality Thesis and AI Preferences [01:17:01] Challenges in AI Alignment [01:20:28] Mechanistic Interpretability in Neural Networks [01:24:54] Building Cleaner Neural Networks [01:31:36] Cognitive horizons / The problem with rapid AI development [01:34:52] Founding Conjecture and raising funds [01:39:36] Inefficiencies in the market and seizing opportunities [01:45:38] Charisma, authenticity, and leadership in startups [01:52:13] Autistic culture and empathy [01:55:26] Learning from real-world experiences [02:01:57] Technical empathy and transhumanism [02:07:18] Moral status and the limits of empathy [02:15:33] Anthropomorphic Thinking and Consequentialism [02:17:42] Conjecture: Balancing Research and Product Development [02:20:37] Epistemology Team at Conjecture [02:31:07] Interpretability and Deception in AGI [02:36:23] Futuristic whack-a-mole and predicting AGI threats [02:38:27] Refs: 1. OpenAI's ChatGPT: https://chat.openai.com/ 2. The Mystery of Mode Collapse (Article): https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/t9svvNPNmFf5Qa3TA/mysteries-of-mode-collapse 3. The Rationalist Guide to the Galaxy https://www.amazon.co.uk/Does-Not-Hate-You-Superintelligence/dp/1474608795 5. Alfred Korzybski: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Korzybski 6. Instrumental Convergence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumental_convergence 7. Orthogonality Thesis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonality_thesis 8. Brian Tomasik's Essays on Reducing Suffering: https://reducing-suffering.org/ 9. Epistemological Framing for AI Alignment Research: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Y4YHTBziAscS5WPN7/epistemological-framing-for-ai-alignment-research 10. How to Defeat Mind readers: https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/EhAbh2pQoAXkm9yor/circumventing-interpretability-how-to-defeat-mind-readers 11. Society of mind: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Society-Mind-Marvin-Minsky/dp/0671607405

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Send us a voice message which you want us to publish: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/machinelearningstreettalk/message In a recent open letter, over 1500 individuals called for a six-month pause on the development of advanced AI systems, expressing concerns over the potential risks AI poses to society and humanity. However, there are issues with this approach, including global competition, unstoppable progress, potential benefits, and the need to manage risks instead of avoiding them. Decision theorist Eliezer Yudkowsky took it a step further in a Time magazine article, calling for an indefinite and worldwide moratorium on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) development, warning of potential catastrophe if AGI exceeds human intelligence. Yudkowsky urged for an immediate halt to all large AI training runs and the shutdown of major GPU clusters, calling for international cooperation to enforce these measures. However, several counterarguments question the validity of Yudkowsky's concerns:

1. Hard limits on AGI 2. Dismissing AI extinction risk 3. Collective action problem 4. Misplaced focus on AI threats While the potential risks of AGI cannot be ignored, it is essential to consider various arguments and potential solutions before making drastic decisions. As AI continues to advance, it is crucial for researchers, policymakers, and society as a whole to engage in open and honest discussions about the potential consequences and the best path forward. With a balanced approach to AGI development, we may be able to harness its power for the betterment of humanity while mitigating its risks. Eliezer Yudkowsky: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliezer_Yudkowsky Connor Leahy: https://twitter.com/NPCollapse (we will release that interview soon) Gary Marcus: http://garymarcus.com/index.html Tim Scarfe is the innovation CTO of XRAI Glass: https://xrai.glass/ Gary clip filmed at AIUK https://ai-uk.turing.ac.uk/programme/ and our appreciation to them for giving us a press pass. Check out their conference next year! WIRED clip from Gary came from here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Puo3VkPkNZ4 Refs:

Statement from the listed authors of Stochastic Parrots on the “AI pause” letterTimnit Gebru, Emily M. Bender, Angelina McMillan-Major, Margaret Mitchell

https://www.dair-institute.org/blog/letter-statement-March2023 Eliezer Yudkowsky on Lex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaTRHFaaPG8 Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down (Eliezer Yudkowsky) https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/

HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT, CHATGPT+WOLFRAM! You saw it HERE first! YT version: https://youtu.be/z5WZhCBRDpU Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 Stephen's announcement post: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/03/chatgpt-gets-its-wolfram-superpowers/ OpenAI's announcement post: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plugins In an era of technology and innovation, few individuals have left as indelible a mark on the fabric of modern science as our esteemed guest, Dr. Steven Wolfram. Dr. Wolfram is a renowned polymath who has made significant contributions to the fields of physics, computer science, and mathematics. A prodigious young man too, Wolfram earned a Ph.D. in theoretical physics from the California Institute of Technology by the age of 20. He became the youngest recipient of the prestigious MacArthur Fellowship at the age of 21. Wolfram's groundbreaking computational tool, Mathematica, was launched in 1988 and has become a cornerstone for researchers and innovators worldwide. In 2002, he published "A New Kind of Science," a paradigm-shifting work that explores the foundations of science through the lens of computational systems. In 2009, Wolfram created Wolfram Alpha, a computational knowledge engine utilized by millions of users worldwide. His current focus is on the Wolfram Language, a powerful programming language designed to democratize access to cutting-edge technology. Wolfram's numerous accolades include honorary doctorates and fellowships from prestigious institutions. As an influential thinker, Dr. Wolfram has dedicated his life to unraveling the mysteries of the universe and making computation accessible to all. First of all... we have an announcement to make, you heard it FIRST here on MLST! .... Intro [00:00:00] Big announcement! Wolfram + ChatGPT! [00:02:57] What does it mean to understand? [00:05:33] Feeding information back into the model [00:13:48] Semantics and cognitive categories [00:20:09] Navigating the ruliad [00:23:50] Computational irreducibility [00:31:39] Conceivability and interestingness [00:38:43] Human intelligible sciences [00:43:43]

YT version: https://youtu.be/P1j3VoKBxbc (references in pinned comment) Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 Dan McQuillan, a visionary in digital culture and social innovation, emphasizes the importance of understanding technology's complex relationship with society. As an academic at Goldsmiths, University of London, he fosters interdisciplinary collaboration and champions data-driven equity and ethical technology. Dan's career includes roles at Amnesty International and Social Innovation Camp, showcasing technology's potential to empower and bring about positive change. In this conversation, we discuss the challenges and opportunities at the intersection of technology and society, exploring the profound impact of our digital world. Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

[00:00:00] Dan's background and journey to academia

[00:03:30] Dan's background and journey to academia

[00:04:10] Writing the book "Resisting AI"

[00:08:30] Necropolitics and its relation to AI

[00:10:06] AI as a new form of colonization

[00:12:57] LLMs as a new form of neo-techno-imperialism

[00:15:47] Technology for good and AGI's skewed worldview

[00:17:49] Transhumanism, eugenics, and intelligence

[00:20:45] Valuing differences (disability) and challenging societal norms

[00:26:08] Re-ontologizing and the philosophy of information

[00:28:19] New materialism and the impact of technology on society

[00:30:32] Intelligence, meaning, and materiality

[00:31:43] The constraints of physical laws and the importance of science

[00:32:44] Exploring possibilities to reduce suffering and increase well-being

[00:33:29] The division between meaning and material in our experiences

[00:35:36] Machine learning, data science, and neoplatonic approach to understanding reality

[00:37:56] Different understandings of cognition, thought, and consciousness

[00:39:15] Enactivism and its variants in cognitive science

[00:40:58] Jordan Peterson

[00:44:47] Relationism, relativism, and finding the correct relational framework

[00:47:42] Recognizing privilege and its impact on social interactions

[00:49:10] Intersectionality / Feminist thinking and the concept of care in social structures

[00:51:46] Intersectionality and its role in understanding social inequalities

[00:54:26] The entanglement of history, technology, and politics

[00:57:39] ChatGPT article - we come to bury ChatGPT

[00:59:41] Statistical pattern learning and convincing patterns in AI

[01:01:27] Anthropomorphization and understanding in AI

[01:03:26] AI in education and critical thinking

[01:06:09] European Union policies and trustable AI

[01:07:52] AI reliability and the halo effect

[01:09:26] AI as a tool enmeshed in society

[01:13:49] Luddites

[01:15:16] AI is a scam

[01:15:31] AI and Social Relations

[01:16:49] Invisible Labor in AI and Machine Learning

[01:21:09] Exploititative AI / alignment

[01:23:50] Science fiction AI / moral frameworks

[01:27:22] Discussing Stochastic Parrots and Nihilism

[01:30:36] Human Intelligence vs. Language Models

[01:32:22] Image Recognition and Emulation vs. Experience

[01:34:32] Thought Experiments and Philosophy in AI Ethics (mimicry)

[01:41:23] Abstraction, reduction, and grounding in reality

[01:43:13] Process philosophy and the possibility of change

[01:49:55] Mental health, AI, and epistemic injustice

[01:50:30] Hermeneutic injustice and gendered techniques

[01:53:57] AI and politics

[01:59:24] Epistemic injustice and testimonial injustice

[02:11:46] Fascism and AI discussion

[02:13:24] Violence in various systems

[02:16:52] Recognizing systemic violence

[02:22:35] Fascism in Today's Society

[02:33:33] Pace and Scale of Technological Change

[02:37:38] Alternative approaches to AI and society

[02:44:09] Self-Organization at Successive Scales / cybernetics

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst  

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

We are honoured to welcome Dr. Joel Lehman, an eminent machine learning research scientist, whose work in AI safety, reinforcement learning, creative open-ended search algorithms, and indeed the philosophy of open-endedness and abandoning objectives has paved the way for innovative ideas that challenge our preconceptions and inspire new visions for the future.

Dr. Lehman's thought-provoking book, "Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned" penned with with our MLST favourite Professor Kenneth Stanley has left an indelible mark on the field and profoundly impacted the way we view innovation and the serendipitous nature of discovery. Those of you who haven't watched our special edition show on that, should do so at your earliest convenience! Building upon this foundation, Dr. Lehman has ventured into the domain of AI systems that embody principles of love, care, responsibility, respect, and knowledge, drawing from the works of Maslow, Erich Fromm, and positive psychology.

YT version: https://youtu.be/23-TXgJEv-Q

http://joellehman.com/

https://twitter.com/joelbot3000

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC:

Intro [00:00:00]

Model [00:04:26]

Intro and Paper Intro [00:08:52]

Subjectivity [00:16:07]

Reflections on Greatness Book [00:19:30]

Representing Subjectivity [00:29:24]

Nagal's Bat [00:31:49]

Abstraction [00:38:58]

Love as Action Rather Than Feeling [00:42:58]

Reontologisation [00:57:38]

Self Help [01:04:15]

Meditation [01:09:02]

The Human Reward Function / Effective... [01:16:52]

Machine Hate [01:28:32]

Societal Harms [01:31:41]

Lenses We Use Obscuring Reality [01:56:36]

Meta Optimisation and Evolution [02:03:14]

Conclusion [02:07:06]

References:

What Is It Like to Be a Bat? (Thomas Nagel)

https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf

Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective (Kenneth O. Stanley and Joel Lehman)

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-15524-1 

Machine Love (Joel Lehman)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09248 

How effective altruists ignored risk (Carla Cremer)

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23569519/effective-altrusim-sam-bankman-fried-will-macaskill-ea-risk-decentralization-philanthropy

Philosophy tube - The Rich Have Their Own Ethics: Effective Altruism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm0vHQYKI-Y

Abandoning Objectives: Evolution through the Search for Novelty Alone (Joel Lehman and Kenneth O. Stanley)

https://www.cs.swarthmore.edu/~meeden/DevelopmentalRobotics/lehman_ecj11.pdf

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Dr. Raphaël Millière is the 2020 Robert A. Burt Presidential Scholar in Society and Neuroscience in the Center for Science and Society, and a Lecturer in the Philosophy Department at Columbia University. His research draws from his expertise in philosophy and cognitive science to explore the implications of recent progress in deep learning for models of human cognition, as well as various issues in ethics and aesthetics. He is also investigating what underlies the capacity to represent oneself as oneself at a fundamental level, in humans and non-human animals; as well as the role that self-representation plays in perception, action, and memory. In a world where technology is rapidly advancing, Dr. Millière is striving to gain a better understanding of how artificial neural networks work, and to establish fair and meaningful comparisons between humans and machines in various domains in order to shed light on the implications of artificial intelligence for our lives.

https://www.raphaelmilliere.com/

https://twitter.com/raphaelmilliere

Here is a version with hesitation sounds like "um" removed if you prefer (I didn't notice them personally): https://share.descript.com/view/aGelyTl2xpN

YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhn6ZtD6XeE

TOC:

Intro to Raphael [00:00:00]

Intro: Moving Beyond Mimicry in Artificial Intelligence (Raphael Millière) [00:01:18]

Show Kick off [00:07:10]

LLMs [00:08:37]

Semantic Competence/Understanding [00:18:28]

Forming Analogies/JPG Compression Article [00:30:17]

Compositional Generalisation [00:37:28]

Systematicity [00:47:08]

Language of Thought [00:51:28]

Bigbench (Conceptual Combinations) [00:57:37]

Symbol Grounding [01:11:13]

World Models [01:26:43]

Theory of Mind [01:30:57]

Refs (this is truncated, full list on YT video description):

Moving Beyond Mimicry in Artificial Intelligence (Raphael Millière)

https://nautil.us/moving-beyond-mimicry-in-artificial-intelligence-238504/

On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜 (Bender et al)

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188.3445922

ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web (Ted Chiang)

https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web

The Debate Over Understanding in AI's Large Language Models (Melanie Mitchell)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13966

Talking About Large Language Models (Murray Shanahan)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03551

Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data (Bender)

https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.463/

The symbol grounding problem (Stevan Harnad)

https://arxiv.org/html/cs/9906002

Why the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus is interesting and important for AI (Mitchell)

https://aiguide.substack.com/p/why-the-abstraction-and-reasoning

Linguistic relativity (Sapir–Whorf hypothesis)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity

Cooperative principle (Grice's four maxims of conversation - quantity, quality, relation, and manner)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle

This show is sponsored by Numerai, please visit them here with our sponsor link (we would really appreciate it) http://numer.ai/mlst 

Prof. Karl Friston recently proposed a vision of artificial intelligence that goes beyond machines and algorithms, and embraces humans and nature as part of a cyber-physical ecosystem of intelligence. This vision is based on the principle of active inference, which states that intelligent systems can learn from their observations and act on their environment to reduce uncertainty and achieve their goals. This leads to a formal account of collective intelligence that rests on shared narratives and goals. 

To realize this vision, Friston suggests developing a shared hyper-spatial modelling language and transaction protocol, as well as novel methods for measuring and optimizing collective intelligence. This could harness the power of artificial intelligence for the common good, without compromising human dignity or autonomy. It also challenges us to rethink our relationship with technology, nature, and each other, and invites us to join a global community of sense-makers who are curious about the world and eager to improve it.

YT version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_VXOdf1NMw

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst 

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

TOC: 

Intro [00:00:00]

Numerai (Sponsor segment) [00:07:10]

Designing Ecosystems of Intelligence from First Principles (Friston et al) [00:09:48]

Information / Infosphere and human agency [00:18:30]

Intelligence [00:31:38]

Reductionism [00:39:36]

Universalism [00:44:46]

Emergence [00:54:23]

Markov blankets [01:02:11]

Whole part relationships / structure learning [01:22:33]

Enactivism [01:29:23]

Knowledge and Language [01:43:53]

ChatGPT [01:50:56]

Ethics (is-ought) [02:07:55]

Can people be evil? [02:35:06]

Ethics in Al, subjectiveness [02:39:05]

Final thoughts [02:57:00]

References:

Designing Ecosystems of Intelligence from First Principles (Friston et al)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01354

GLOM - How to represent part-whole hierarchies in a neural network (Hinton)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.12627.pdf

Seven Brief Lessons on Physics (Carlo Rovelli)

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Seven-Brief-Lessons-Physics-Rovelli/dp/0141981725

How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain (Lisa Feldman Barrett)

https://www.amazon.co.uk/How-Emotions-Are-Made-Secret/dp/B01N3D4OON

Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) (Karl Friston)

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00579/full

Integrated information theory (Giulio Tononi)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_information_theory

Access Numerai here: http://numer.ai/mlst

Michael Oliver is the Chief Scientist at Numerai, a hedge fund that crowdsources machine learning models from data scientists. He has a PhD in Computational Neuroscience from UC Berkeley and was a postdoctoral researcher at the Allen Institute for Brain Science before joining Numerai in 2020. He is also the host of Numerai Quant Club, a YouTube series where he discusses Numerai’s research, data and challenges.

YT version: https://youtu.be/61s8lLU7sFg

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction to Michael and Numerai

[00:02:03] Understanding / new Bing

[00:22:47] Quant vs Neuroscience

[00:36:43] Role of language in cognition and planning, and subjective... 

[00:45:47] Boundaries in finance modelling

[00:48:00] Numerai

[00:57:37] Aggregation systems

[01:00:52] Getting started on Numeral

[01:03:21] What models are people using

[01:04:23] Numerai Problem Setup

[01:05:49] Regimes in financial data and quant talk

[01:11:18] Esoteric approaches used on Numeral?

[01:13:59]  Curse of dimensionality

[01:16:32] Metrics

[01:19:10] Outro

References:

Growing Neural Cellular Automata (Alexander Mordvintsev)

https://distill.pub/2020/growing-ca/

A Thousand Brains: A New Theory of Intelligence (Jeff Hawkins)

https://www.amazon.fr/Thousand-Brains-New-Theory-Intelligence/dp/1541675819

Perceptual Neuroscience: The Cerebral Cortex (Vernon B. Mountcastle)

https://www.amazon.ca/Perceptual-Neuroscience-Cerebral-Vernon-Mountcastle/dp/0674661885

Numerai Quant Club with Michael Oliver

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLIxarbDXuQ&list=PLz3D6SeXhT3tTu8rhZmjwDZpkKi-UPO1F

Numerai YT channel

https://www.youtube.com/@Numerai/featured

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst 

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst  

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Christopher Summerfield, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford is a Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Oxford and a Research Scientist at Deepmind UK. His work focusses on the neural and computational mechanisms by which humans make decisions.

Chris has just released an incredible new book on AI called "Natural General Intelligence". It's my favourite book on AI I have read so so far. 

The book explores the algorithms and architectures that are driving progress in AI research, and discusses intelligence in the language of psychology and biology, using examples and analogies to be comprehensible to a wide audience. It also tackles longstanding theoretical questions about the nature of thought and knowledge.

With Chris' permission, I read out a summarised version of Chapter 2 from his book on which was on Intelligence during the 30 minute MLST introduction.  

Buy his book here:

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/natural-general-intelligence-9780192843883?cc=gb&lang=en&

YT version: https://youtu.be/31VRbxAl3t0

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC:

[00:00:00] Walk and talk with Chris on Knowledge and Abstractions

[00:04:08] Intro to Chris and his book

[00:05:55] (Intro) Tim reads Chapter 2: Intelligence 

[00:09:28] Intro continued: Goodhart's law

[00:15:37] Intro continued: The "swiss cheese" situation  

[00:20:23] Intro continued: On Human Knowledge

[00:23:37] Intro continued: Neats and Scruffies

[00:30:22] Interview kick off 

[00:31:59] What does it mean to understand?

[00:36:18] Aligning our language models

[00:40:17] Creativity 

[00:41:40] "Meta" AI and basins of attraction 

[00:51:23] What can Neuroscience impart to AI

[00:54:43] Sutton, neats and scruffies and human alignment

[01:02:05] Reward is enough

[01:19:46] Jon Von Neumann and Intelligence

[01:23:56] Compositionality

References:

The Language Game (Morten H. Christiansen, Nick Chater

https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/441689/the-language-game-by-morten-h-christiansen-and--nick-chater/9781787633483

Theory of general factor (Spearman)

https://www.proquest.com/openview/7c2c7dd23910c89e1fc401e8bb37c3d0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1818401

Intelligence Reframed (Howard Gardner)

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Qkw4DgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT6&dq=howard+gardner+multiple+intelligences&ots=ERUU0u5Usq&sig=XqiDgNUIkb3K9XBq0vNbFmXWKFs#v=onepage&q=howard%20gardner%20multiple%20intelligences&f=false

The master algorithm (Pedro Domingos)

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Master-Algorithm-Ultimate-Learning-Machine/dp/0241004543

A Thousand Brains: A New Theory of Intelligence (Jeff Hawkins)

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Thousand-Brains-New-Theory-Intelligence/dp/1541675819

The bitter lesson (Rich Sutton)

http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst 

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT: https://youtu.be/i9VPPmQn9HQ

Edward Grefenstette is a Franco-American computer scientist who currently serves as Head of Machine Learning at Cohere and Honorary Professor at UCL. He has previously been a research scientist at Facebook AI Research and staff research scientist at DeepMind, and was also the CTO of Dark Blue Labs. Prior to his move to industry, Edward was a Fulford Junior Research Fellow at Somerville College, University of Oxford, and was lecturing at Hertford College. He obtained his BSc in Physics and Philosophy from the University of Sheffield and did graduate work in the philosophy departments at the University of St Andrews. His research draws on topics and methods from Machine Learning, Computational Linguistics and Quantum Information Theory, and has done work implementing and evaluating compositional vector-based models of natural language semantics and empirical semantic knowledge discovery.

https://www.egrefen.com/

https://cohere.ai/

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:02:52] Differential Semantics

[00:06:56] Concepts

[00:10:20] Ontology

[00:14:02] Pragmatics

[00:16:55] Code helps with language

[00:19:02] Montague

[00:22:13] RLHF

[00:31:54] Swiss cheese problem / retrieval augmented

[00:37:06] Intelligence / Agency

[00:43:33] Creativity

[00:46:41] Common sense

[00:53:46] Thinking vs knowing

References:

Large language models are not zero-shot communicators (Laura Ruis)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14986

Some remarks on Large Language Models (Yoav Goldberg)

https://gist.github.com/yoavg/59d174608e92e845c8994ac2e234c8a9

Quantum Natural Language Processing (Bob Coecke)

https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/bob.coecke/QNLP-ACT.pdf

Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback

https://www.anthropic.com/constitutional.pdf

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks (Patrick Lewis)

https://www.patricklewis.io/publication/rag/

Natural General Intelligence (Prof. Christopher Summerfield)

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/natural-general-intelligence-9780192843883

ChatGPT with Rob Miles - Computerphile

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viJt_DXTfwA

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT: https://youtu.be/Vbi288CKgis

Michael Levin is a Distinguished Professor in the Biology department at Tufts University, and the holder of the Vannevar Bush endowed Chair. He is the Director of the Allen Discovery Center at Tufts and the Tufts Center for Regenerative and Developmental Biology. His research focuses on understanding the biophysical mechanisms of pattern regulation and harnessing endogenous bioelectric dynamics for rational control of growth and form.

The capacity to generate a complex, behaving organism from the single cell of a fertilized egg is one of the most amazing aspects of biology. Levin' lab integrates approaches from developmental biology, computer science, and cognitive science to investigate the emergence of form and function. Using biophysical and computational modeling approaches, they seek to understand the collective intelligence of cells, as they navigate physiological, transcriptional, morphognetic, and behavioral spaces. They develop conceptual frameworks for basal cognition and diverse intelligence, including synthetic organisms and AI.

Also joining us this evening is Irina Rish. Irina is a Full Professor at the Université de Montréal's Computer Science and Operations Research department, a core member of Mila - Quebec AI Institute, as well as the holder of the Canada CIFAR AI Chair and the Canadian Excellence Research Chair in Autonomous AI. She has a PhD in AI from UC Irvine. Her research focuses on machine learning, neural data analysis, neuroscience-inspired AI, continual lifelong learning, optimization algorithms, sparse modelling, probabilistic inference, dialog generation, biologically plausible reinforcement learning, and dynamical systems approaches to brain imaging analysis. 

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:02:09] Emergence

[00:13:16] Scaling Laws

[00:23:12] Intelligence

[00:44:36] Transhumanism

Prof. Michael Levin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Levin_(biologist)

https://www.drmichaellevin.org/

https://twitter.com/drmichaellevin

Prof. Irina Rish

https://twitter.com/irinarish

https://irina-rish.com/

Dr. Patrick Lewis is a London-based AI and Natural Language Processing Research Scientist, working at co:here. Prior to this, Patrick worked as a research scientist at the Fundamental AI Research Lab (FAIR) at Meta AI. During his PhD, Patrick split his time between FAIR and University College London, working with Sebastian Riedel and Pontus Stenetorp. 

Patrick’s research focuses on the intersection of information retrieval techniques (IR) and large language models (LLMs). He has done extensive work on Retrieval-Augmented Language Models. His current focus is on building more powerful, efficient, robust, and update-able models that can perform well on a wide range of NLP tasks, but also excel on knowledge-intensive NLP tasks such as Question Answering and Fact Checking.

YT version: https://youtu.be/Dm5sfALoL1Y

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

References:

Patrick Lewis (Natural Language Processing Research Scientist @ co:here)

https://www.patricklewis.io/

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks (Patrick Lewis et al)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401

Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models (Gautier Izacard, Patrick Lewis, et al)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03299

Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens (RETRO) (Sebastian Borgeaud et al)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04426

YT version (with references): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxaTinmKxs0

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Carla Cremer and Igor Krawczuk argue that AI risk should be understood as an old problem of politics, power and control with known solutions, and that threat models should be driven by empirical work. The interaction between FTX and the Effective Altruism community has sparked a lot of discussion about the dangers of optimization, and Carla's Vox article highlights the need for an institutional turn when taking on a responsibility like risk management for humanity.

Carla's “Democratizing Risk” paper found that certain types of risks fall through the cracks if they are just categorized into climate change or biological risks. Deliberative democracy has been found to be a better way to make decisions, and AI tools can be used to scale this type of democracy and be used for good, but the transparency of these algorithms to the citizens using the platform must be taken into consideration.

Aggregating people’s diverse ways of thinking about a problem and creating a risk-averse procedure gives a likely, highly probable outcome for having converged on the best policy. There needs to be a good reason to trust one organization with the risk management of humanity and all the different ways of thinking about risk must be taken into account. AI tools can help to scale this type of deliberative democracy, but the transparency of these algorithms must be taken into consideration.

The ambition of the EA community and Altruism Inc. is to protect and do risk management for the whole of humanity and this requires an institutional turn in order to do it effectively. The dangers of optimization are real, and it is essential to ensure that the risk management of humanity is done properly and ethically. By understanding the importance of aggregating people’s diverse ways of thinking about a problem, and creating a risk-averse procedure, it is possible to create a likely, highly probable outcome for having converged on the best policy.

Carla Zoe Cremer

https://carlacremer.github.io/

Igor Krawczuk

https://krawczuk.eu/

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction: Vox article and effective altruism / FTX

[00:11:12] Luciano Floridi on Governance and Risk

[00:15:50] Connor Leahy on alignment

[00:21:08] Ethan Caballero on scaling

[00:23:23] Alignment, Values and politics

[00:30:50] Singularitarians vs AI-thiests

[00:41:56] Consequentialism

[00:46:44] Does scale make a difference?

[00:51:53] Carla's Democratising risk paper

[01:04:03] Vox article - How effective altruists ignored risk

[01:20:18] Does diversity breed complexity?

[01:29:50] Collective rationality

[01:35:16] Closing statements

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT version: https://youtu.be/YLNGvvgq3eg

We are living in an age of rapid technological advancement, and with this growth comes a digital divide. Professor Luciano Floridi of the Oxford Internet Institute / Oxford University believes that this divide not only affects our understanding of the implications of this new age, but also the organization of a fair society. 

The Information Revolution has been transforming the global economy, with the majority of global GDP now relying on intangible goods, such as information-related services. This in turn has led to the generation of immense amounts of data, more than humanity has ever seen in its history. With 95% of this data being generated by the current generation, Professor Floridi believes that we are becoming overwhelmed by this data, and that our agency as humans is being eroded as a result. 

According to Professor Floridi, the digital divide has caused a lack of balance between technological growth and our understanding of this growth. He believes that the infosphere is becoming polluted and the manifold of the infosphere is increasingly determined by technology and AI. Identifying, anticipating and resolving these problems has become essential, and Professor Floridi has dedicated his research to the Philosophy of Information, Philosophy of Technology and Digital Ethics. 

We must equip ourselves with a viable philosophy of information to help us better understand and address the risks of this new information age. Professor Floridi is leading the charge, and his research on Digital Ethics, the Philosophy of Information and the Philosophy of Technology is helping us to better anticipate, identify and resolve problems caused by the digital divide.

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction to Luciano and his ideas

[00:14:00] Chat GPT / language models

[00:28:45] AI risk / "Singularitarians" 

[00:37:15] Forms of governance

[00:43:56] Re-ontologising the world

[00:55:56] It from bit and Computationalism and philosophy without purpose

[01:03:05] Getting into Digital Ethics

Interviewer: Dr. Tim Scarfe

References:

GPT‐3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences [Floridi]

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3827044

Ultraintelligent Machines, Singularity, and Other Sci-fi Distractions about AI [Floridi]

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4222347

The Philosophy of Information [Floridi]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philosophy-Information-Luciano-Floridi/dp/0199232393

Information: A Very Short Introduction [Floridi]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Information-Very-Short-Introduction-Introductions/dp/0199551375

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luciano_Floridi

https://www.philosophyofinformation.net/

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT version: https://youtu.be/YLNGvvgq3eg

(If music annoying, skip to main interview @ 14:14)

We are living in an age of rapid technological advancement, and with this growth comes a digital divide. Professor Luciano Floridi of the Oxford Internet Institute / Oxford University believes that this divide not only affects our understanding of the implications of this new age, but also the organization of a fair society. 

The Information Revolution has been transforming the global economy, with the majority of global GDP now relying on intangible goods, such as information-related services. This in turn has led to the generation of immense amounts of data, more than humanity has ever seen in its history. With 95% of this data being generated by the current generation, Professor Floridi believes that we are becoming overwhelmed by this data, and that our agency as humans is being eroded as a result. 

According to Professor Floridi, the digital divide has caused a lack of balance between technological growth and our understanding of this growth. He believes that the infosphere is becoming polluted and the manifold of the infosphere is increasingly determined by technology and AI. Identifying, anticipating and resolving these problems has become essential, and Professor Floridi has dedicated his research to the Philosophy of Information, Philosophy of Technology and Digital Ethics. 

We must equip ourselves with a viable philosophy of information to help us better understand and address the risks of this new information age. Professor Floridi is leading the charge, and his research on Digital Ethics, the Philosophy of Information and the Philosophy of Technology is helping us to better anticipate, identify and resolve problems caused by the digital divide.

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction to Luciano and his ideas

[00:14:40] Chat GPT / language models

[00:29:24] AI risk / "Singularitarians" 

[00:30:34] Re-ontologising the world

[00:56:35] It from bit and Computationalism and philosophy without purpose

[01:03:43] Getting into Digital Ethics

References:

GPT‐3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences [Floridi]

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3827044

Ultraintelligent Machines, Singularity, and Other Sci-fi Distractions about AI [Floridi]

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4222347

The Philosophy of Information [Floridi]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philosophy-Information-Luciano-Floridi/dp/0199232393

Information: A Very Short Introduction [Floridi]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Information-Very-Short-Introduction-Introductions/dp/0199551375

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luciano_Floridi

https://www.philosophyofinformation.net/

Research has shown that humans possess strong inductive biases which enable them to quickly learn and generalize. In order to instill these same useful human inductive biases into machines, a paper was presented by Sreejan Kumar at the NeurIPS conference which won the Outstanding Paper of the Year award. The paper is called Using Natural Language and Program Abstractions to Instill Human Inductive Biases in Machines.

This paper focuses on using a controlled stimulus space of two-dimensional binary grids to define the space of abstract concepts that humans have and a feedback loop of collaboration between humans and machines to understand the differences in human and machine inductive biases. 

It is important to make machines more human-like to collaborate with them and understand their behavior. Synthesised discrete programs running on a turing machine computational model instead of a neural network substrate offers promise for the future of artificial intelligence. Neural networks and program induction should both be explored to get a well-rounded view of intelligence which works in multiple domains, computational substrates and which can acquire a diverse set of capabilities.

Natural language understanding in models can also be improved by instilling human language biases and programs into AI models. Sreejan used an experimental framework consisting of two dual task distributions, one generated from human priors and one from machine priors, to understand the differences in human and machine inductive biases. Furthermore, he demonstrated that compressive abstractions can be used to capture the essential structure of the environment for more human-like behavior. This means that emergent language-based inductive priors can be distilled into artificial neural networks, and AI  models can be aligned to the us, world and indeed, our values.

Humans possess strong inductive biases which enable them to quickly learn to perform various tasks. This is in contrast to neural networks, which lack the same inductive biases and struggle to learn them empirically from observational data, thus, they have difficulty generalizing to novel environments due to their lack of prior knowledge. 

Sreejan's results showed that when guided with representations from language and programs, the meta-learning agent not only improved performance on task distributions humans are adept at, but also decreased performa on control task distributions where humans perform poorly. This indicates that the abstraction supported by these representations, in the substrate of language or indeed, a program, is key in the development of aligned artificial agents with human-like generalization, capabilities, aligned values and behaviour.

References

Using natural language and program abstractions to instill human inductive biases in machines [Kumar et al/NEURIPS]

https://openreview.net/pdf?id=buXZ7nIqiwE

Core Knowledge [Elizabeth S. Spelke / Harvard]

https://www.harvardlds.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SpelkeKinzler07-1.pdf

The Debate Over Understanding in AI's Large Language Models [Melanie Mitchell]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13966

On the Measure of Intelligence [Francois Chollet]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547

ARC challenge [Chollet]

https://github.com/fchollet/ARC

Pedro Domingos, Professor Emeritus of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Washington, is renowned for his research in machine learning, particularly for his work on Markov logic networks that allow for uncertain inference. He is also the author of the acclaimed book "The Master Algorithm".

Panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe

TOC:

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:01:34] Galaxtica / misinformation / gatekeeping

[00:12:31] Is there a master algorithm?

[00:16:29] Limits of our understanding 

[00:21:57] Intentionality, Agency, Creativity

[00:27:56] Compositionality 

[00:29:30] Digital Physics / It from bit / Wolfram 

[00:35:17] Alignment / Utility functions

[00:43:36] Meritocracy  

[00:45:53] Game theory 

[01:00:00] EA/consequentialism/Utility

[01:11:09] Emergence / relationalism 

[01:19:26] Markov logic 

[01:25:38] Moving away from anthropocentrism 

[01:28:57] Neurosymbolic / infinity / tensor algerbra

[01:53:45] Abstraction

[01:57:26] Symmetries / Geometric DL

[02:02:46] Bias variance trade off 

[02:05:49] What seen at neurips

[02:12:58] Chalmers talk on LLMs

[02:28:32] Definition of intelligence

[02:32:40] LLMs 

[02:35:14] On experts in different fields

[02:40:15] Back to intelligence

[02:41:37] Spline theory / extrapolation

YT version:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9BH3F2c0vQ

References;

The Master Algorithm [Domingos]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=master+algorithm&i=stripbooks&crid=3CJ67DCY96DE8&sprefix=master+algorith%2Cstripbooks%2C82&ref=nb_sb_noss_2

INFORMATION, PHYSICS, QUANTUM: THE SEARCH FOR LINKS [John Wheeler/It from Bit]

https://philpapers.org/archive/WHEIPQ.pdf

A New Kind Of Science [Wolfram]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Kind-Science-Stephen-Wolfram/dp/1579550088

The Rationalist's Guide to the Galaxy: Superintelligent AI and the Geeks Who Are Trying to Save Humanity's Future [Tom Chivers]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Does-Not-Hate-You-Superintelligence/dp/1474608795

The Status Game: On Social Position and How We Use It [Will Storr]

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/60598238-the-status-game

Newcomb's paradox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomb%27s_paradox

The Case for Strong Emergence [Sabine Hossenfelder]

https://philpapers.org/rec/HOSTCF-3

Markov Logic: An Interface Layer for Artificial Intelligence [Domingos]

https://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00206ED1V01Y200907AIM007

Note; Pedro discussed “Tensor Logic” - I was not able to find a reference

Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy [Grégoire Delétang/DeepMind]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02098

Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis [Jerry A. Fodor and Zenon W. Pylyshyn]

https://ruccs.rutgers.edu/images/personal-zenon-pylyshyn/proseminars/Proseminar13/ConnectionistArchitecture.pdf

Every Model Learned by Gradient Descent Is Approximately a Kernel Machine [Pedro Domingos]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00152

A Path Towards Autonomous Machine Intelligence Version 0.9.2, 2022-06-27 [LeCun]

https://openreview.net/pdf?id=BZ5a1r-kVsf

Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges [Michael M. Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Taco Cohen, Petar Veličković]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13478

The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science [Gary Marcus]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Algebraic-Mind-Integrating-Connectionism-D

Canadian Excellence Research Chair in Autonomous AI. Irina holds an MSc and PhD in AI from the University of California, Irvine as well as an MSc in Applied Mathematics from the Moscow Gubkin Institute. Her research focuses on machine learning, neural data analysis, and neuroscience-inspired AI. In particular, she is exploring continual lifelong learning, optimization algorithms for deep neural networks, sparse modelling and probabilistic inference, dialog generation, biologically plausible reinforcement learning, and dynamical systems approaches to brain imaging analysis. Prof. Rish holds 64 patents, has published over 80 research papers, several book chapters, three edited books, and a monograph on Sparse Modelling. She has served as a Senior Area Chair for NeurIPS and ICML.   Irina's research is focussed on taking us closer to the holy grail of Artificial General Intelligence.  She continues to push the boundaries of machine learning, continually striving to make advancements in neuroscience-inspired AI.

In a conversation about artificial intelligence (AI), Irina and Tim discussed the idea of transhumanism and the potential for AI to improve human flourishing. Irina suggested that instead of looking at AI as something to be controlled and regulated, people should view it as a tool to augment human capabilities. She argued that attempting to create an AI that is smarter than humans is not the best approach, and that a hybrid of human and AI intelligence is much more beneficial. As an example, she mentioned how technology can be used as an extension of the human mind, to track mental states and improve self-understanding. Ultimately, Irina concluded that transhumanism is about having a symbiotic relationship with technology, which can have a positive effect on both parties.

Tim then discussed the contrasting types of intelligence and how this could lead to something interesting emerging from the combination. He brought up the Trolley Problem and how difficult moral quandaries could be programmed into an AI. Irina then referenced The Garden of Forking Paths, a story which explores the idea of how different paths in life can be taken and how decisions from the past can have an effect on the present.

To better understand AI and intelligence, Irina suggested looking at it from multiple perspectives and understanding the importance of complex systems science in programming and understanding dynamical systems. She discussed the work of Michael Levin, who is looking into reprogramming biological computers with chemical interventions, and Tim mentioned Alex Mordvinsev, who is looking into the self-healing and repair of these systems. Ultimately, Irina argued that the key to understanding AI and intelligence is to recognize the complexity of the systems and to create hybrid models of human and AI intelligence.

Find Irina;

https://mila.quebec/en/person/irina-rish/

https://twitter.com/irinarish

YT version: https://youtu.be/8-ilcF0R7mI 

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

References;

The Garden of Forking Paths: Jorge Luis Borges [Jorge Luis Borges]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Garden-Forking-Paths-Penguin-Modern/dp/0241339057

The Brain from Inside Out [György Buzsáki]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Brain-Inside-Out-Gy%C3%B6rgy-Buzs%C3%A1ki/dp/0190905387

Growing Isotropic Neural Cellular Automata [Alexander Mordvintsev]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01681

The Extended Mind [Andy Clark and David Chalmers]

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150

The Gentle Seduction [Marc Stiegler]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Gentle-Seduction-Marc-Stiegler/dp/0671698877

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

Alan Chan is a PhD student at Mila, the Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms, supervised by Nicolas Le Roux. Before joining Mila, Alan was a Masters student at the Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute and the University of Alberta, where he worked with Martha White. Alan's expertise and research interests encompass value alignment and AI governance. He is currently exploring the measurement of harms from language models and the incentives that agents have to impact the world. Alan's research focuses on understanding and controlling the values expressed by machine learning models. His projects have examined the regulation of explainability in algorithmic systems, scoring rules for performative binary prediction, the effects of global exclusion in AI development, and the role of a graduate student in approaching ethical impacts in AI research. In addition, Alan has conducted research into inverse policy evaluation for value-based sequential decision-making, and the concept of "normal accidents" and AI systems. Alan's research is motivated by the need to align AI systems with human values, and his passion for scientific and governance work in this field. Alan's energy and enthusiasm for his field is infectious. 

This was a discussion at NeurIPS. It was in quite a loud environment so the audio quality could have been better. 

References:

The Rationalist's Guide to the Galaxy: Superintelligent AI and the Geeks Who Are Trying to Save Humanity's Future [Tim Chivers]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Does-Not-Hate-You-Superintelligence/dp/1474608795

The implausibility of intelligence explosion [Chollet]

https://medium.com/@francois.chollet/the-impossibility-of-intelligence-explosion-5be4a9eda6ec

Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies [Bostrom]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Superintelligence-Dangers-Strategies-Nick-Bostrom/dp/0199678111

A Theory of Universal Artificial Intelligence based on Algorithmic Complexity [Hutter]

https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0004001

YT version: https://youtu.be/XBMnOsv9_pk 

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

Professor Murray Shanahan is a renowned researcher on sophisticated cognition and its implications for artificial intelligence. His 2016 article ‘Conscious Exotica’ explores the Space of Possible Minds, a concept first proposed by philosopher Aaron Sloman in 1984, which includes all the different forms of minds from those of other animals to those of artificial intelligence. Shanahan rejects the idea of an impenetrable realm of subjective experience and argues that the majority of the space of possible minds may be occupied by non-natural variants, such as the ‘conscious exotica’ of which he speaks.  In his paper ‘Talking About Large Language Models’, Shanahan discusses the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs). He argues that prompt engineering is a key element for advanced AI systems, as it involves exploiting prompt prefixes to adjust LLMs to various tasks. However, Shanahan cautions against ascribing human-like characteristics to these systems, as they are fundamentally different and lack a shared comprehension with humans. Even though LLMs can be integrated into embodied systems, it does not mean that they possess human-like language abilities. Ultimately, Shanahan concludes that although LLMs are formidable and versatile, we must be wary of over-simplifying their capacities and limitations.

YT version: https://youtu.be/BqkWpP3uMMU

Full references on the YT description. 

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:08:51] Consciousness and  Consciousness Exotica

[00:34:59] Slightly Consciousness LLMs

[00:38:05] Embodiment

[00:51:32] Symbol Grounding 

[00:54:13] Emergence

[00:57:09] Reasoning

[01:03:16] Intentional Stance

[01:07:06] Digression on Chomsky show and Andrew Lampinen

[01:10:31] Prompt Engineering

Find Murray online:

https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~mpsha/

https://twitter.com/mpshanahan?lang=en

https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=00bnGpAAAAAJ&hl=en

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

Sara Hooker is an exceptionally talented and accomplished leader and research scientist in the field of machine learning. She is the founder of Cohere For AI, a non-profit research lab that seeks to solve complex machine learning problems. She is passionate about creating more points of entry into machine learning research and has dedicated her efforts to understanding how progress in this field can be translated into reliable and accessible machine learning in the real-world.

Sara is also the co-founder of the Trustworthy ML Initiative, a forum and seminar series related to Trustworthy ML. She is on the advisory board of Patterns and is an active member of the MLC research group, which has a focus on making participation in machine learning research more accessible.

Before starting Cohere For AI, Sara worked as a research scientist at Google Brain. She has written several influential research papers, including "The Hardware Lottery", "The Low-Resource Double Bind: An Empirical Study of Pruning for Low-Resource Machine Translation", "Moving Beyond “Algorithmic Bias is a Data Problem”" and "Characterizing and Mitigating Bias in Compact Models". 

In addition to her research work, Sara is also the founder of the local Bay Area non-profit Delta Analytics, which works with non-profits and communities all over the world to build technical capacity and empower others to use data. She regularly gives tutorials on machine learning fundamentals, interpretability, model compression and deep neural networks and is dedicated to collaborating with independent researchers around the world.

Sara Hooker is famous for writing a paper introducing the concept of the 'hardware lottery', in which the success of a research idea is determined not by its inherent superiority, but by its compatibility with available software and hardware. She argued that choices about software and hardware have had a substantial impact in deciding the outcomes of early computer science history, and that with the increasing heterogeneity of the hardware landscape, gains from advances in computing may become increasingly disparate. Sara proposed that an interim goal should be to create better feedback mechanisms for researchers to understand how their algorithms interact with the hardware they use. She suggested that domain-specific languages, auto-tuning of algorithmic parameters, and better profiling tools may help to alleviate this issue, as well as provide researchers with more informed opinions about how hardware and software should progress. Ultimately, Sara encouraged researchers to be mindful of the implications of the hardware lottery, as it could mean that progress on some research directions is further obstructed. If you want to learn more about that paper, watch our previous interview with Sara.

YT version: https://youtu.be/7oJui4eSCoY

MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

TOC:

[00:00:00] Intro

[00:02:53] Interpretability / Fairness

[00:35:29] LLMs

Find Sara:

https://www.sarahooker.me/

https://twitter.com/sarahookr

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

Hattie Zhou, a PhD student at Université de Montréal and Mila, has set out to understand and explain the performance of modern neural networks, believing it a key factor in building better, more trusted models. Having previously worked as a data scientist at Uber, a private equity analyst at Radar Capital, and an economic consultant at Cornerstone Research, she has recently released a paper in collaboration with the Google Brain team, titled ‘Teaching Algorithmic Reasoning via In-context Learning’. In this work, Hattie identifies and examines four key stages for successfully teaching algorithmic reasoning to large language models (LLMs): formulating algorithms as skills, teaching multiple skills simultaneously, teaching how to combine skills, and teaching how to use skills as tools. Through the application of algorithmic prompting, Hattie has achieved remarkable results, with an order of magnitude error reduction on some tasks compared to the best available baselines. This breakthrough demonstrates algorithmic prompting’s viability as an approach for teaching algorithmic reasoning to LLMs, and may have implications for other tasks requiring similar reasoning capabilities.

TOC

[00:00:00] Hattie Zhou

[00:19:49] Markus Rabe [Google Brain]

Hattie's Twitter - https://twitter.com/oh_that_hat

Website - http://hattiezhou.com/

Teaching Algorithmic Reasoning via In-context Learning [Hattie Zhou, Azade Nova, Hugo Larochelle, Aaron Courville, Behnam Neyshabur, and Hanie Sedghi]

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.09066.pdf

Markus Rabe [Google Brain]:

https://twitter.com/markusnrabe

https://research.google/people/106335/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/markusnrabe

Autoformalization with Large Language Models [Albert Jiang Charles Edgar Staats Christian Szegedy Markus Rabe Mateja Jamnik Wenda Li Yuhuai Tony Wu]

https://research.google/pubs/pub51691/

Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT: https://youtu.be/80i6D2TJdQ4

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

(On the main version we released; the music was a tiny bit too loud in places, and some pieces had percussion which was a bit distracting -- here is a version with all music removed so you have the option! )

David Chalmers is a professor of philosophy and neural science at New York University, and an honorary professor of philosophy at the Australian National University. He is the co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness, as well as the PhilPapers Foundation. His research focuses on the philosophy of mind, especially consciousness, and its connection to fields such as cognitive science, physics, and technology. He also investigates areas such as the philosophy of language, metaphysics, and epistemology. With his impressive breadth of knowledge and experience, David Chalmers is a leader in the philosophical community.

The central challenge for consciousness studies is to explain how something immaterial, subjective, and personal can arise out of something material, objective, and impersonal. This is illustrated by the example of a bat, whose sensory experience is much different from ours, making it difficult to imagine what it's like to be one. Thomas Nagel's "inconceivability argument" has its advantages and disadvantages, but ultimately it is impossible to solve the mind-body problem due to the subjective nature of experience. This is further explored by examining the concept of philosophical zombies, which are physically and behaviorally indistinguishable from conscious humans yet lack conscious experience. This has implications for the Hard Problem of Consciousness, which is the attempt to explain how mental states are linked to neurophysiological activity. The Chinese Room Argument is used as a thought experiment to explain why physicality may be insufficient to be the source of the subjective, coherent experience we call consciousness. Despite much debate, the Hard Problem of Consciousness remains unsolved. Chalmers has been working on a functional approach to decide whether large language models are, or could be conscious. 

Filmed at #neurips22

Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

Pod: https://anchor.fm/machinelearningstreettalk/episodes/90---Prof--DAVID-CHALMERS---Slightly-Conscious-LLMs-e1sej50

TOC;

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:00:40] LLMs consciousness pitch

[00:06:33] Philosophical Zombies

[00:09:26] The hard problem of consciousness

[00:11:40] Nagal's bat and intelligibility 

[00:21:04] LLM intro clip from NeurIPS

[00:22:55] Connor Leahy on self-awareness in LLMs

[00:23:30] Sneak peek from unreleased show - could consciousness be a submodule?

[00:33:44] SeppH

[00:36:15] Tim interviews David at NeurIPS (functionalism / panpsychism / Searle)

[00:45:20] Peter Hase interviews Chalmers (focus on interpretability/safety)

Panel:

Dr. Tim Scarfe

Dr. Keith Duggar

Contact David;

https://mobile.twitter.com/davidchalmers42

https://consc.net/

References;

Could a Large Language Model Be Conscious? [Chalmers NeurIPS22 talk]

https://nips.cc/media/neurips-2022/Slides/55867.pdf

What Is It Like to Be a Bat? [Nagel]

https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf

Zombies

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zombies/

zombies on the web [Chalmers]

https://consc.net/zombies-on-the-web/

The hard problem of consciousness [Chalmers]

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-00485-017

David Chalmers, "Are Large Language Models Sentient?" [NYU talk, same as at NeurIPS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BcuCmf00_Y

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

David Chalmers is a professor of philosophy and neural science at New York University, and an honorary professor of philosophy at the Australian National University. He is the co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness, as well as the PhilPapers Foundation. His research focuses on the philosophy of mind, especially consciousness, and its connection to fields such as cognitive science, physics, and technology. He also investigates areas such as the philosophy of language, metaphysics, and epistemology. With his impressive breadth of knowledge and experience, David Chalmers is a leader in the philosophical community.

The central challenge for consciousness studies is to explain how something immaterial, subjective, and personal can arise out of something material, objective, and impersonal. This is illustrated by the example of a bat, whose sensory experience is much different from ours, making it difficult to imagine what it's like to be one. Thomas Nagel's "inconceivability argument" has its advantages and disadvantages, but ultimately it is impossible to solve the mind-body problem due to the subjective nature of experience. This is further explored by examining the concept of philosophical zombies, which are physically and behaviorally indistinguishable from conscious humans yet lack conscious experience. This has implications for the Hard Problem of Consciousness, which is the attempt to explain how mental states are linked to neurophysiological activity. The Chinese Room Argument is used as a thought experiment to explain why physicality may be insufficient to be the source of the subjective, coherent experience we call consciousness. Despite much debate, the Hard Problem of Consciousness remains unsolved. Chalmers has been working on a functional approach to decide whether large language models are, or could be conscious. 

Filmed at #neurips22

Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT: https://youtu.be/T7aIxncLuWk

TOC;

[00:00:00] Introduction

[00:00:40] LLMs consciousness pitch

[00:06:33] Philosophical Zombies

[00:09:26] The hard problem of consciousness

[00:11:40] Nagal's bat and intelligibility

[00:21:04] LLM intro clip from NeurIPS

[00:22:55] Connor Leahy on self-awareness in LLMs

[00:23:30] Sneak peek from unreleased show - could consciousness be a submodule?

[00:33:44] SeppH

[00:36:15] Tim interviews David at NeurIPS (functionalism / panpsychism / Searle)

[00:45:20] Peter Hase interviews Chalmers (focus on interpretability/safety)

Panel:

Dr. Tim Scarfe

Dr. Keith Duggar

Contact David;

https://mobile.twitter.com/davidchalmers42

https://consc.net/

References;

Could a Large Language Model Be Conscious? [Chalmers NeurIPS22 talk] 

https://nips.cc/media/neurips-2022/Slides/55867.pdf

What Is It Like to Be a Bat? [Nagel]

https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf

Zombies

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zombies/

zombies on the web [Chalmers]

https://consc.net/zombies-on-the-web/

The hard problem of consciousness [Chalmers]

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-00485-017

David Chalmers, "Are Large Language Models Sentient?" [NYU talk, same as at NeurIPS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BcuCmf00_Y

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst

Dr. Walid Saba recently reviewed the book Machines Will Never Rule The World, which argues that strong AI is impossible. He acknowledges the complexity of modeling mental processes and language, as well as interactive dialogues, and questions the authors' use of "never." Despite his skepticism, he is impressed with recent developments in large language models, though he questions the extent of their success.

We then discussed the successes of cognitive science. Walid believes that something has been achieved which many cognitive scientists would never accept, namely the ability to learn from data empirically. Keith agrees that this is a huge step, but notes that there is still much work to be done to get to the "other 5%" of accuracy. They both agree that the current models are too brittle and require much more data and parameters to get to the desired level of accuracy.

Walid then expresses admiration for deep learning systems' ability to learn non-trivial aspects of language from ingesting text only. He argues that this is an "existential proof" of language competency and that it would be impossible for a group of luminaries such as Montague, Marvin Minsky, John McCarthy, and a thousand other bright engineers to replicate the same level of competency as we have now with LLMs. He then discusses the problem of semantics and pragmatics, as well as symbol grounding, and expresses skepticism about grounded meaning and embodiment. He believes that artificial intelligence should be used to solve real-world problems which require human intelligence but not believe that robots should be built to understand love or other subjective feelings.

We discussed the unique properties of natural human language. Walid believes that the core unique property is the ability to do abductive reasoning, which is the process of reasoning to the best explanation or understanding. Keith adds that there are two types of abduction - one for generating hypotheses and one for justifying them. In both cases, abductive reasoning involves choosing from a set of plausible possibilities.

Finally, we discussed the book "Machines Will Never Rule The World" and its argument that the current mathematics and technology is not enough to model complex systems. Walid agrees with the book's argument but is still optimistic that a new mathematics can be discovered. Keith suggests the possibility of an AGI discovering the mathematics to create itself. They also discussed how the book could serve as a reminder to temper the hype surrounding AI and to focus on exploration, creativity, and daring ideas. Walid ended by stressing the importance of science, noting that engineers should play within the Venn diagrams drawn by scientists, rather than trying to hack their way through it.

Transcript: https://share.descript.com/view/BFQb5iaegJC

Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5

YT: https://youtu.be/IMnWAuoucjo

TOC:

[00:00:00] Intro

[00:06:52] Walid's change of heart on DL/LLMs and on the skeptics like Gary Marcus

[00:22:52] Symbol Grounding

[00:32:26] On Montague

[00:40:41] On Abduction

[00:50:54] Language of thought

[00:56:08] Why machines will never rule the world book review

[01:20:06] Engineers should play in the scientists Venn Diagram!

Panel;

Dr. Tim Scarfe

Dr. Keith Duggar

Mark Mcguill