Living Outside the Matrix

A growing number of people are placing their hope for an end to the insanity of the pandemic hoax in the legal pursuits of people such as Michael O’ Bernicia, Simon Dolan and the class action lawsuit of Reiner Fuellmich.  But is there a realistic chance of success in using the legal systems that are owned and controlled by those unleashing the tyranny? Is the common law any kind of solution for the people? Or is it all just smoke and mirrors to make people think that something is being done by someone else, and thus encourage inaction? These are the questions we address in this weeks Episode of Living outside the Matrix with Guy Euden.
Guy was one of the leading lights of the freeman movement some 10 years ago here in the UK and achieved success in the court room as well as with his documentation. He has continued his research and now lives in New Zealand, where he is part of a research group keeping up with the global events being orchestrated by those in favour of collectivism and a ‘One World’ government.

Guy reminds us that the political agenda of control has been in place for 1400 years. The Protocols of Zion are a road map too tyranny, and were methodically “debunked” and many sources of information on them removed from the internet some years ago. Yet they clearly set out a clear road map to tyranny. Interestingly, almost all of the results of searches will lead to sites that clearly tell you that the documents are fake and have been debunked. This should rightly sound alarm bells in the thinking mind. here are a couple of examples…
https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/image/protocols-elders-zion-1927
https://www.historytoday.com/archive/protocols-elders-zion
Legal solutions
The political agenda is widely published and is not kept secret, irrespective of the protocols of Zion. There are many think tanks advocating more central government and political control. It is the common theme of the fight against the alleged threat of terrorism, the alleged threat of climate change, and now the fight against the alleged threat of a virus.
From the sum of his experience and knowledge Guy says that there is only a ‘Notice of Liability’ that can be used in this context. It is essentially a conditional acceptance and can really only be used in the case of mandated vaccination. The legal attempts being made by Michael O’ Bernicia and Simon Dolan are attempting to use the tool of the establishment against the establishment. This strategy obviously has a very limited chance of success and these efforts should not undermine anyone’s commitment to going to protests in the mean time.
So, what can we do?
According to Guy its all about numbers. We need vast numbers of people to refuse to comply. Civil disobedience is called for on a large scale. Yet this look unlikely to happen. The weekend of March 20th/21st with protests around the world was promising but only a small blip. There is no trend of civil disobedience, there is a massive trend of unthinking compliance.

* Get out and protest
* Refuse to wear a mask
* Refuse to socially distance
* Continue to trade whenever and wherever you can
* Rationally persuade others around you
* Reject mysticism and all forms of inventing reality without proof or evidence – including viruses
* Educate yourself
* Prepare for  the coming decades of statist tyranny

No, its not too late. There is always a chance as long as men and women are prepared to think and to act on their thinking, and to value reason as there only guide to knowledge.
Check out Lawful Rebel on these other platforms

* Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbhNffwvqIMj-_r7g0pA1Vg
* Bitchute –

Taking supplements is something many health conscious people do. It is often thought that essential vitamins supplements are worth adding to our diets because our food is depleted of nutrients after decades of modern farming methods. On the face of it, this seems a reasonable assumption – until you scratch beneath the surface and ask some questions. How are these vitamin supplements made? Are they really the same stuff as the vitamins found in our food? These are the kind of questions Daniel began asking as he investigated the subject after lecturing for many years as a nutritionist.
Daniel has his own podcast called, Humanley where he interviews health experts and asks the fundamental questions. He is a thinker and researcher who dares to challenge the dogma he has been taught. In Episode 164 of Living outside the Matrix he shares what he has discovered during this process of questioning the assumptions of his profession. The results will surprise you.

resources:
The Humanley Podcast can be found at www.humanley.com/podcast or at https://humanley.podbean.com/
Daniel’s Telegram account can be found at t.me/humanley
If you are interested, here is what Wikipedia has to say about vitamins – what are vitamins?

It has always been important to be able to accurately discern which claims are true and which are false. We humans need knowledge of reality in order to know how to act, so we can lead successful lives. This means we need to have a means of validating the ideas we hold to be true. We need to be able to check the information we hear and verify that it is true before we act on it – otherwise we inevitably suffer. Epistemology is the science of ‘knowledge’ and how we know things. With a correct epistemology you can reach for the stars. With a faulty one, all that results is confusion, anxiety and suffering.
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that deals with knowledge. Epistemology asks the questions; What is knowledge? How does man validate his conclusions? What are the proper methods of thinking? The correct answers to these questions inform the method that the truth seeker must adopt if he is to achieve certainty as a result of his investigations.
The base of philosophy can be summed up by three questions; What exists? How do I know? and, So what? Metaphysics is the study of reality and asks, ‘What exists?’ Epistemology is the study of knowledge, and asks the question ‘How do I know?’. And Ethics is the study of how should man act, and address the question, So What?

Metaphysics is the first question in philosophy because it affects all the other areas including politics and aesthetics. You cannot ask how you know something until you have addressed the question of the nature of reality. The answer to this question determines the epistemology that logically follows. The conclusions formed after asking this most fundamental question determine even if knowledge can be acquired at all!

In Podcast 162, Dr Andrew Kaufman joins me to discuss epistemology. Specifically, the consequences of the basic metaphysical question – is reality an objective absolute, independent of any consciousness, or is it a projection or creation of consciousness? These two positions on the issue exhaust the logical possibilities. The first may be called the Primacy of Existence, the second, the Primacy of Consciousness.
This first question of metaphysics is of paramount importance, because one answer (the Primacy of Existence) leads to truth, knowledge, successful action, life. The other one (the Primacy of Consciousness) leads to confusion, conflict, destruction and suffering! Of course, a suitable time lag disguises the issue sufficiently for most men not to be able to see the problem.
Unfortunately Dr Kaufman fails to recognise this crucial distinction. In stead of engaging in a crucial intellectual issue, he remained defensive and concerned that I was trying to get him to be an atheist. And the whole point is that one cannot be a truth seeker and believe in a supernatural deity at the same time. It is a contradiction. How can you demand proof of the existence of a virus and not for the existence of God?
Dr Kaufman declined to post this interview on his own social media channels. I am left wondering why anyone would find it offensive to be concerned that truth seekers be consistent. But perhaps more importantly, the concept of rights is central to the goal of freedom, but must be argued for on a rational basis, and they can be. Anyone setting themselves up as a leader of a freedom movement, which Dr Kaufman very obviously is, will not succeed if they argue that rights are a gift from God. In other words, if they use the wrong epistemology, one of faith and feelings, they have no rational argument for freedom.
resources:
Dr Andrew Kaufman’s website is www.andrewkaufmanmd.com
Dr Kaufman’s True Medicine Library can be found here www.truemedicinelibrary.com

In this episode of Living outside the Matrix, we bring you a panel of UK-based thinkers that are challenging the official dogma on viruses. In spite of widespread belief to the contrary, viruses have never been proven to exist, as such. No controlled experiments have properly isolated them, and they have never been proven to cause any disease. Unless this truth becomes general knowledge two results are inevitable. Firstly, humanity will remain locked in a false paradigm that prevents genuine understanding of the nature and causes of disease. Secondly, the door will be left open for the useful justification of political control under the guise of protecting public health.
The Panel
Joan Shenton – Writer, producer and director. Joan wrote the book “Positively False” in 1998, and then produced the film “Positively false – birth of  heresy” along with “Positive Hell”, a 30-minute documentary about being diagnosed with AIDS. She also produced the film “Sacrificial Virgins” about the dangers of taking a vaccine against the HPV virus that allegedly causes cervical cancer. She runs the “Immunity Resource Foundation” on the website https://www.immunity.org.uk/
Dr Kevin Corbett PhD – Retired Nurse and health scientist https://kevinpcorbett.com/
Dawn Lester and David Parker – Authors of “What Really Makes You ill” – why everything you thought you knew about disease is wrong” https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/
Andrew Johnson of https://www.checktheevidence.com/

Do Viruses exists

Contagion, and the issue of whether or not viruses exist as disease causing (pathogenic) organisms, is one of the most important questions of our time, because it impacts both human health and freedom. We must determine the truth so we can properly pursue and achieve health, and we must determine the truth because otherwise we can potentially be quarantined and detained on false premises.
It is crucial to understand that the mainstream belief in viruses and contagion leads to disease, suffering and enslavement. But the truth, that there are no viruses and that you do not ‘catch’ any disease from a pathogenic particle, leads to the possibility of individuals achieving health independently, and removes any justification to take away people’s freedom on trumped up public health grounds.
Let’s consider these separately.

Health:
The truth about this issue liberates thinking people everywhere from dependency on the ‘disease management’ model of health care, and opens the door for them to gain the necessary knowledge required to take full personal responsibility for their health. When we consider the evidence in support of disease being caused by other things such as toxic exposure and poor nutrition, health becomes easily achievable through well-considered lifestyle choices well within everyone’s grasp. Your health outcomes become clear consequences of choices well within your control. This is the ‘terrain’ model of health and disease. It’s very empowering, and it is true – if one considers the evidence.
Furthermore, the truth of this issue removes the fear of living in a dangerous world where there are microscopic life-threatening enemies everywhere. The truth transforms that fear into the confident and secure pleasure of mastering one’s own lifestyle choices in the knowledge that it is these that cause either your disease or your health. Proper nutrition and the avoidance of toxicity are two of the basic guiding principles.
Freedom 
This is the second and arguably even more important concept affected by this question – do viruses exist as disease causing agents. The truth that there are no pathogenic viruses...

In the world today we see the proliferation of bad ideas! Ideas that are false because they contain some aspect that is not true, that does not correspond to reality.
I have been researching across a broad range of topics for the past 10 years, and I have found bad ideas in almost every subject I look into: In science, in medicine, in politics, in climatology, in philosophy, and in the thinking of ordinary people.
Bad ideas, or ideas that are false, cannot lead to anything but failure and suffering. So it’s imperative that we identify any false ideas that we believe to be true. We must consider them, evaluate them, judge them, and reject them.

Ideas affecting values and choices
The most dangerous false ideas are not ones that point to events and things, out there in the world, but those that affect our thinking, our values, and our choices. Meaning, the ideas that affect the way we live. These are the fundamental ideas that, if false, lead to many other downstream or subsequent ideas that are also false.
For example, in medicine, the evidence that contradicts the cherished theory of the cause of disease (germ theory) is ignored. Such evidence reveals that the idea is false. Consequently, no one is looking for a theory of disease causation that is not contradicted by the facts of reality – i.e., the one that is true, because the question has already been answered – if falsely. Remember, all consequent actions based on a falsely identified cause, will, a) not work, and b) cause suffering. (And this is what we see in medicine and health care systems across the world.) The same principle holds for all the bad ideas out there in every field of study. In other words, this is a widespread cultural problem extending across the board. When you uncover something false in the mainstream narrative, it is not an unfortunate isolated incidence. The root problem is systemic!
My purpose in this podcast is to share with you some of the most fundamental false ideas I have identified, so that you too may consider them, and if you hold them to be true, that you may perhaps reconsider them.
There is one specific category of ideas that should be at the top of your list for questioning. These are all the ideas that pertain to, and reflect, the thinking of men. These are usually of a philosophical nature, because philosophy IS the study of fundamental ideas that effect the way we live. These ideas are not at all obviously false, because they are quite abstract, and removed from the observable facts of daily life.
It is the results of such false and fundamental ideas that manifest in the institutions of men, such as in the realms of politics, economics, science and technology, health care, etc.
Some ideas are very powerful because they motivate us and effect our values. The most obvious example is the recent idea of a pandemic, with a scary disease-causing pathogen sweeping the planet changed the behaviour of billions of people! As opposed to an idea of where to have lunch.
It’s worth noting that We very rarely deal with ideas one at a time. They come packaged together in bundles with some component ideas appearing more obviously than others. These complex ideas must be unpacked. For example, the alleged climate emergency issue implicitly makes human beings the problem. Since human actions, from breathing to all forms of energy use, release CO2. If we accept that human caused carbon dioxide is a problem for the environment, we implicitly accept that human activity is the problem.
Let’s look at a couple of examples, that a lot of people hold to be true.
Number 1 – Unconditional Love
This is held up as some kind of wonderful ideal to be aspired to. But what does it mean? It means to love someone for no reasons whatsoever. This means, you should be just as willing to love an evil child molester, as a caring and benevolent parent; You should be just as willing wi...

The pioneering work of Dr Tom Cowan and Dr Andy Kaufman has stimulated debate. However, in order to move the issue forward productively a challenge has been made to the virology community to prove their claims. Given the massive implications riding on this claim it is very reasonable to ask for it to be proven. The freedom of the western world rests on it as does the advancement of the science of medicine into a post germ theory era. The challenge is summarised on a two page document that can be found on the website of Dr Sam Bailey, here. I invite you to read it and share it. This is arguably the most important issue of our time. They are calling for the settling of the virus debate by objective scientific experimentation.
In this Episode of “Living outside the Matrix” I am joined by Dr Kevin Corbett, one of the signatories of the document, to discuss the historical context from the the alleged AIDS epidemic of the 1980s. Kevin Corbett MSc PhD is a health scientist and qualified general nurse who has worked in family planning and sexual health.
Neither Dr Corbett nor his associates are saying that people were not sick during the alleged Coronavirus pandemic. What they are saying is that there is no proof for the existence of any corona virus (or any virus for that matter, including HIV) and there is no proof that any supposed pathogen is the causative agent of any disease.
In the interview Dr Corbett recounts his background with involvement in the Perth Group, who were key players in challenging the dogma around AIDS and the alleged HIV virus in the 1980s. He also cites the publication “Continuum” from that era, and informs us that back issues are still available on line, even though the publication is no longer in print. It remain a treasure trove of information that is highly relevant to the medical issues of today. The key difference being that today our political freedom is at stake with lock downs, quarantines and governments taking complete control of society in the name of public health.
Continuum was a dissident AIDS journal based in London in the 1990s – all editions available here: https://www.immunity.org.uk/continuum/
In Continuum’s January/February 1996 edition, the magazine began offering £1,000 to the first person who could find a scientific study that proved the isolation of HIV – see small box advert (top right) on page 4 here: https://www.immunity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/v3n5.pdf
Peter Duesberg tried to claim the prize and wrote an article for the magazine in its July/August 1996 issue but his claim was rejected because it did not meet the conditions. Here is Duesberg’s claim on pages 8-9 of this PDF: https://www.immunity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/v4n2.pdf source: Continuun 4 (2), July/August 1996.
In the following edition of Continuum, The Perth Group responded, see Special Supplement (Virus Isolation Special) beginning on page 17 https://www.immunity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/v4n3.pdf source: Continuum 4(3), September/October 1996.
Back in 2000, President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa brought together mainstream and non-mainstream scientists to discuss the isolation of HIV and the causation of AIDS at two meetings called the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel. Dr Corbett attended the first one of these with Joan Shenton.
The experiments that The Perth Group stipulated should have been undertaken to prove the isolation and the pathogen...

In order to best understand the world we live in it is crucial to think in terms of fundamentals and to be philosophically aware. One must have a basic knowledge of philosophy and preferably of Ayn Rand’s philosophy Objectivism. When the full context is held in mind its clear that there is no great awakening happening, and the claim that such is the case is a counter-productive call to inaction.
As little as a century ago the average person had far more common sense than people today and they were less gullible because they were more anchored in the real world than we are today. Of course, the context was different and they did not have the technological ability to access information and therefore uncover the truth had they been inclined to investigate. And unlike us they had no track record of broken promises and obvious false claims to stimulate suspicion.
3 contextual points:
The first contextual idea to bear in mind is that men have been controlling other men since the very beginning of human interactions. Let’s remind ourselves of the concept of slavery and that until the mid 1800s it was a ubiquitous fact of human life across the globe.
It is also no secret that there are many voices calling for a New World Order that is essentially one world government as a means of political control. This idea is not championed by ordinary people on the street, it is championed by the super wealthy and their “think tanks” and those calling the shots – the parasite class.
The second point is that central banking – the key means of controlling nations by controlling the money supply – has been around a long time. It was established in England with the charter of the Bank of England in 1694. The model spread across Europe, and has become the means by which wealthy private shareholders of these central banks control the money supply and thereby the economy of their respective countries.
The third point I want to make is philosophical.
The renaissance of the 15th and 16th centuries was the rebirth of REASON as man’s guiding principle since the ancient Greece. It was a period when mysticism gave way to a rational approach to human life. The key features of the thinking of this period were that reality was held to be an objective absolute and that it was considered knowable to the human mind. Not everyone held these ideas, but they came to dominate European culture for a brief period. The result was the scientific and industrial revolutions, and massive progress of humanity out of poverty and into an age of technological growth and development.
The two ideas of an objective reality and therefore a knowable reality gave birth to scientific method and a string of key discoveries such as electricity and electric lighting, the internal combustion engine, and many more. But also, these ideas gave birth to the USA, the first free nation on earth. You see, when reason is mans dominant guiding principle, mankind recognises the objective nature of reality and grasps that knowledge is possible to the human mind – that the mind is competent to know reality. These ideas always go together, and they lead to individualism and political freedom.
But in 1781 the publication of a book called “A critique of Pure Reason” by a German Philosopher called Emmanuel Kant, saw the beginning of the reversal of these dominant ideas. Setting himself up a champion of reason (in a typical Trojan horse tactic of the intellectual variety) Kant proceeded to destroy the concept and precipitated a U-turn in the philosophical direction of western culture. It didn’t happen overnight, but the seeds were sown for the key ideas that a) reality is created by consciousness, and b) that reality is unknowable. Kant (and his promoters) reversed the thinking trend of the Renaissance and began the trend to undermine man’s mind by undermining our grasp of reality and our ability to know it.

Dr Andy Kaufman presents himself as one of the foremost rational thinkers of today. In his questioning of the pandemic narrative he went directly to the fundamentals and sought proof of the existence of the virus and the evidence for and against the predominant paradigm of germ theory in medicine. He followed in the footsteps of Nancy Turner Banks and others such as Stephan Lanka and picked up the thread of those questioning the existence of any HIV virus that allegedly causes AIDS. His scrupulous investigation and unceasing demand for evidence, that could not be produced, led him to the inevitable conclusion that there are no viruses. No one has ever shown a virus to exist by isolating it from all other organic matter in the proper dictionary definition of the term – separating from everything else. I commend his ruthlessly logical approach to this issue.
The implications of this are enormous. You have nothing to fear in ‘catching’ a disease from a virus. It means the Pandemic was a hoax, that vaccinations are a waste of time and no means to immunity. It means that wearing masks and locking people down is useless to prevent disease. In short it constitutes proof that we have all been lied to on this crucial medical issue! It highlights the facts that uncovering a lie, or discovering a false claim, has immense value in seeking truth.
Andy points out the necessity of using logic in your thinking process, and the importance of being aware of logical fallacies. These are apparent logical arguments (or reasons to believe something) that on closer inspection, or more considered thinking, turn out to be false and not reasons for anything at all.

I wanted to get philosophical with Andy because one of the core logical fallacies that is responsible for almost all modern illogical thinking is one identified by Ayn Rand. She called it the fallacy of the stolen concept. It is when you use a concept (or an idea) while implicitly contradicting or arguing against it by holding another idea to be true. Usually this fallacy is committed when people argue for or against an idea without knowing that they are implicitly contradicting another more fundamental concept (or idea) that they are already using. Its like inadvertently cutting off the branch you are standing on if you were climbing a tree.
examples of this fallacy include: championing freedom while standing against capitalism, championing freedom while holding that altruism and the code of self-sacrifice is a good thing, Believing that you can create your own reality while searching for truth, claiming to be a truth seeker while believing in a supernatural deity and other mystical ideas.
We covered a few logical fallacies but unfortunately I didn’t bring this one up. I was saddened to hear Andy say that it was logic that caused him to move away from atheism, since this is another logical fallacy. If one cannot find a rational (logical) explanation for any event or phenomena it is not rational (or logical) to reach for a non-logical one out of apparent ‘necessity’ of finding (or inventing) any kind of explanation. I went on to press him in my next interview — Episode 162 — and found that his thinking is inconsistent. He advocates one way of thinking for discerning the truth about viruses, and another (that contradicts the concept of truth) in so-called spiritual matters. This is very disappointing since he is currently placed at the forefront of a health/freedom movement. It is crucial to note that with this kind of mixed up thinking freedom cannot be achieved!
The key point that is absolutely crucial is that

It’s never been more important to know the truth than in the context of today! Freedom is on the line! But how good are the methods used to discern truth? Are they effective? Are they reliable? In this podcast we discuss 2 easy mistakes that many truth seekers fall into. They are super important because they affect our ability to achieve certainty and to pass on knowledge to others.
We must be able to scrutinise government policies, pandemics, climate emergency, terrorism, etc, and if we find them to be flawed or making false claims we must be able to explain why. We must rise to the challenge of being savvy and astute thinkers who can see through the propaganda! We need to know which ideas are false and which are true and we need to be certain of our conclusions.

 The Traps – Mysticism and Emotions
All truth seekers face two potential traps. They can easily be tempted into considering faith and/or emotions as a means to knowing truth. Faith is what people are appealing to when they talk about “just knowing”. But reason is your ONLY guide to truth.
It is crucial for us truth seekers to understand the consequences of believing that faith and emotions can be guides in discerning truth.

* You can be hoodwinked or conned if you habitually believe on faith.

* You can be controlled by fear if you habitually believe according to how you feel.

* You will never achieve certainty beyond a reasonable doubt in what you know.
* You will be unable to demonstrate with any certainty what is true.
* YOU CANNOT DEFEND FREEDOM FROM THIS BASIS.

BEWARE OF FAITH
What is faith? It is belief in ideas when no reasons can be offered to substantiate them. It is the belief that reasons are unnecessary. Faith is the antithesis of reason.
If you accept something on faith you cannot possibly know why it is true. You cannot explain to others why it is true, you can only tell them its true. You can pass on ready made conclusions but you cannot pass on knowledge and understanding. This is no basis for any movement, never mind a truth movement!
If you accept ideas on faith you cannot achieve certainty. Certainty is a measure of how much evidence supports a claim or proposition. By definition you will have none.
If you accept ideas on faith you are relegated to the position of a child – of simply accepting what you are told, and doing what you are told.
BEWARE OF EMOTIONS

It is similar with emotions. Because ultimately faith is belief based on how you feel as well. When reason and logic are renounced all you left is your emotions.
When you accept that emotions are a means to know reality you avail yourself to emotional control. You can be manipulated into behaving a certain way through fear. Only when you hold reason as your sole means to gain knowledge can you know if a threat is genuine before you act on it.
Accepting ideas as true on the basis of faith or emotions leaves you without knowledge, only hearsay. You cannot rally troops and truth seeking foot soldiers without reasons. You cannot win against the globalists by holding up ideas you have no clue how to validate.
Reason – your only guide to knowledge
For a detailed explanation of why reason is your only guide to truth check out this post.
Freedom and truth have no chance until and unless people grasp that reason is their ONLY means to knowledge because adopting ideas without reasons – even if they are true – cannot be considered knowledge. You cannot pass on understanding without reasons. You cannot launch a crusade for freedom without truth on your side along with the reasons why. How will you persuade anyone to join your revolution if you have no reasons?
To find out more about emotions check out this ...

In this Episode of Living outside the Matrix, Nigel Howitt discusses the importance of holding a world view based on the Primacy of existence. But he points out that currently our culture is dominated by the opposite idea called the primacy of consciousness. The former leads to human flourishment, the latter to tyranny and human suffering!
Ideas are powerful, they motivate us and affect our choice of values as well as morality and behaviour. The more fundamental ideas are the more influence they exert. And the most fundamental ones exert the most influence. These days our culture dis-values truth by implication. Where ever we look, whatever the issue, it seems that assertions and unfounded claims are taken as truth. Tyranny is on the horizon and marching towards us – few seem to notice the signs.
The Primacy of Existence
In this weeks Podcast I discuss this most fundamental and most important idea, and look at the its implications. Its the idea that reality is an objective absolute, existing independently of any consciousness, human, divine, or both. This idea is contrasted with its opposite – that reality is created by consciousness. These two ideas are known in philosophy as the primacy of existence and the primacy of consciousness. All philosophical schools of thought fall on one side or the other of this issue, and there are only two positions that can be taken. Unfortunately, our current western culture is dominated by the wrong one!
Primacy of Consciousness
When we hold a world view dominated by the primacy of existence all goes well and human flourishment is possible. When we hold a world view dominated by the opposite idea it always leads to human suffering. Nigel sets out a clear explanation of  the fact that the wrong one of these two options dominates our present culture!

In the podcast I delve into…

* Assumptions and assumed premises
* Implicit and explicit premises
* The primacy of existence
* The positive implications of the primacy of existence
* The standard of truth
* The primacy of consciousness
* The destruction of truth
* The many negative implications of the primacy of consciousness
* Religions subscribe to the primacy of consciousness by implication
* Integrating or dis-integrating our minds and our thinking

There is a lot packed into this Episode. I sincerely hope you get value from it, and as always please feel free to join the debate and comment below. I am always interested in your views.
I can also be emailed at info@lawfulrebel.com
Nigel Howitt, January 2022
As an additional resource this video presentation by Dr David Kelley may provide some extra helpful insights

The loss of genuine scientific method in the mainstream narrative is a cultural reflection of western thinking. The genuine process of seeking knowledge and identifying truth has given way to a new religion some call Scientism. Its a form of pseudo-science that serves a a mock justification for a political agenda. But is the fakery just for the purposes of manipulation or is there genuine error? Or perhaps is there a mixture of the two – where the deceivers actually believe some of their own delusions?
In this weeks Podcast Patrik Holmqvist and Nigel Howitt discuss the many manifestation of the loss of scientific method in the mainstream narrative, offering numerous examples. They also shed some light on the reasons why this is happening.

Some likely causes of the loss of genuine scientific method

A Failure to think logically

Today we see a widespread inability to think logically among both lay-people and the so-called scientists! For example, epidemiological studies are considered sufficient to claim knowledge with no need to isolate variables in rigorous scientific studies that isolate variables. This is particularly true among those who advocate for veganism or vegetarianism. The China Study being one example. We also see the mainstream virologists conducting their experiments to “isolate” viruses without proper controls that would reveal that it is the process itself of growing the cell culture that produces the so-called cytopathic effect blamed on the alleged virus.
The most obvious sign that logical thinking is no longer practiced among the general population is the fact that the majority fall so easily for logical fallacies. Most people will believe the narrative for 2 main reasons that have nothing to do with logic. Firstly, because everyone else believes it. And  secondly, because the message is championed by authority figures. Appeals to majority and appeals to authority are not logically valid arguments.

* Contradictions don’t exist in reality.

The fact that contradiction cannot exist out there in reality is the basic principle of all logical thinking and rational thought. Contradictions only exist in the minds of men who do not resolve their mental contradictions. Whenever a contradiction is found in a reasoning process or in opposing claims it should be investigated because it shows there is an error. A contradiction is a warning flag showing that reasoning is incorrect. The contradiction must be resolved by identifying which of the contradictory claims is false. Two opposing claims cannot both be right.
If you knew nothing else this principle would guide you to uncovering an enormous amount of nonsense that passes for knowledge in our current cultural context.

* Unquestioned Assumptions

Assuming things are true is very necessary, and we all do it all the time. But when contradictory evidence is found it should rightly be investigated to resolve the contradiction. Genuine scientific method will always seek to disprove a challenging claim. The truth loves to be questioned because it refines certainty. Only the lie is afraid of questions.
Today we see censorship being exercised where legitimate questions are raised. This is the refusal to allow the questioning of assumptions. This is clear proof that genuine scientific method has been abandoned and that manipulation is being practiced.

* Not thinking in fundamentals

We see the advocates of the virus story refuse to question the fundamental assumption of Germ Theory. This is a theory that has been contradicted by many facts many times. yet still the theory is clung to like dogma. The fundamentals of rocket propulsion theory are held sacrosanct and are not allowed to be questioned, yet they logically show that leaving the earths atmosphere is impossible using this technology because a gas expanding freely in a vac...

A key feature of the rational approach is to think and act according to consciously held principles. Accordingly, the rational person, who naturally prioritises health, is guided by consciously chosen principles in the pursuit of optimal health
Your diet is arguably the most powerful tool with which to exert control over your health. So in this weeks podcast we take a look at the most important principles you can uses to guide your eating choices. Some of these, such as toxicity avoidance, should also be used to guide all of your other lifestyle choices as well.
But fear not! There is no need to see this as a permanent end or restriction to your eating pleasure. You can always schedule in indulgence days appropriate to your level of accomplishment. It’s not all about avoidance, self-denial and misery. We can give ourselves a break on the road to more life-promoting eating habits. However, self-discipline and self-control ultimately reap enormous dividends in terms of a sense of achievement, self-esteem and health. All leading to the ultimate goal of a long and happy life.

Principles as Guidance
Nigel covers the need for principles to be held consciously in mind and how they serve as a means to make decision making easier. 7 Guiding principles are covered along with a brief discussion of metabolic flexibility and the many advantages that it brings.

The seven guiding principles are…

* Think long term
* Don’t eat exclusively for taste
* Maintain metabolic flexibility
* Reduce sugar consumption
* Avoid processed wheat products
* Eat Organically produced food
* Practice intermittent fasting

The advantages of metabolic flexibility

* Disease avoidance
* mental clarity
* More energy
* Long range fuel tanks
* Improved gut health
* Increased muscle mass
* Slower ageing
Effortless weight loss




Thinking in Principles
The rational man or woman will naturally want to consciously use principles to guide their actions. We have no choice about using principles to guide action. Our only choice is which ones guide us and whether or not we are conscious of them. Thinking in principles is a key part of increasing the efficiency of our thinking and improving the quality and consistency of our actions towards the ultimate goal of a successful happy human experience.
 

In this weeks podcast I am joined by Roslyn Ross, an author and fellow fan of the ideas of Ayn Rand. We discussed her new children’s book “City Family Farm Family” and the personal story of living half the year on a farm and the other half in a city. Roslyn spends part of the year on her farm in Nicaragua, and the rest in the city of Los Angeles.
We went on to discuss whether or not the Philosophy of Rand will survive in the context of the advancing collectivist global state. Individualism is giving way to collectivism and this can bee seen throughout western civilisation. The question is whether the core ideas of objectivism can help? Or, must they go underground until the collapse of our freedom is complete and the dust settles. Then, could reason once again emerge as the single guiding principle of genuine knowledge.
We certainly have different views. I remain convinced that rational thinking is an evolutionary advantage. Even when the rational man is surrounded by collectivists and thugs his reason will still lead him to conduct his affairs appropriately. And lets also remember that even the collectivists themselves need to use their faculty of reason to grow food, produce goods, build shelters, etc, when there is nothing left to loot.
Ross is a little more pessimistic, noting that intellectual conversations are increasingly out of fashion, people no longer read as much as they used to, and that the practice of objectivist ideas is more likely to end your genetic line than advance it! The core argument being that it all depends on the context of the group you are in. I say, the savvy objectivist isn’t in a group, but always looks for like minded people. Being an individualist does not mean that you shun other rational people in order to go it alone on your selfish path.

Roslyn has written a post script explanation of the points she was making in the conversation. I reproduce them here.

“If you listen to the podcast I want to explain something that I don’t think is very clear: For me, humanity flourishes under individualism. I define “human flourishing” by the incredible things we have invented. The ultimate in human flourishing, in my opinion, would be getting off planet Earth, so that our eggs aren’t all in one basket. There is no social system that has been invented in the history of humanity that encourages this better than individualism and capitalism, and therefore I support those things. I support meritocracy in which the best and brightest are propelled to the top and encouraged to build their visions. I support inequality of outcomes in which the best and brightest get extra resources to build their visions which often better the lives of all humans. To me, “bettering the lives of all humans” means inventing awesome new things and getting us off this planet.
What I am arguing in this podcast is that the majority of the people on Earth do not agree with me. The majority of people on Earth are collectivists. They define human flourishing as their group being on top, whatever that takes and whatever that means and however much suffering is required of other groups to get their group there.
Collectivists play a game in which they pretend that they care about all of humanity. They acquire more power for their group by defining human flourishing as equality of outcomes. They claim–and get many to believe–that human flourishing means harnessing the power of the best and brightest to care for the worst and weakest. It means taxing to death the high earners and using that money to support the lazy and the stupid....

The concepts of health and disease are intimately related, and together they are of crucial importance to every one of us. But these concepts have been hijacked and are being misrepresented to bring about global governance and collectivist tyranny while doing nothing to support genuine health. If we look at the current model (or paradigm) of these concepts we can identify what is wrong with it. If we then compare it with the new emerging paradigm we can see that the solution lies in embracing the new paradigm.
The danger of clinging to the old model is that many will rush into the arms of the state and its so-called ‘health care’ system which does not help anyone to be healthy. As well as adding to dependency on the state, this will soon mean getting vaccinated to qualify for ‘care’, resulting in a fatal blow to health and to freedom.
The mainstream model of health and disease
The conventional mainstream way of regarding health and disease sets us at war with nature and the natural environment. It is a model that locks us into eternal combat with bacteria, fungi and other microbes based on an unproven assumption of germ theory.
Furthermore, it’s a model of helplessness for the individual. It ensures dependence on big pharmaceutical corporations and national “healthcare” systems. It supports disease management as opposed to prevention or cure. The solutions are alleged to be expensive drugs, expensive medical interventions, along with expensive vaccinations to “protect” from us from allegedly deadly infectious diseases. It destroys self-reliance and generates huge profits for its practitioners at your expense.

This whole approach neatly ties pharmaceutical corporations to their prime customers – national health care systems such as the NHS in the UK. Your government then takes your money in the form of taxation to buy all the expensive “treatments”. It must be noted that this tag team of big business with the state is the essence of fascism and is the perfect set up for corruption and control of populations. But maybe I am getting ahead of myself.
Reasons to reject the mainstream health care model
There are very specific and easy to grasp reasons that this conventional approach to health and disease must be rejected. And this means avoiding your conventional doctor apart from maybe getting a diagnosis.
It doesn’t work
For a start, it treats symptoms with drugs. This is simply wrong for three very important reasons. Firstly, it does not address the cause of the illness. Secondly, drugs have a wide range of effects on the body, most of which are detrimental. One is singled out and championed as the “cure” for that symptom, while the rest are put in small print and called side-effects. These side effects invariably cause harm. And thirdly, it supports a system of disease management rather prevention or cure.
The second fundamental problem with the mainstream paradigm is that it holds that disease is directly linked to (if not caused by) genetics. This approach disregards the role of the environmental toxicity as a cause and supports the position of ignoring the toxicity in food and agriculture, the water supply, sun cream, and as a result of EMF exposure, etc,. and carry on prescribing toxic drugs to alleviate only symptoms. Furthermore, this supports the idea of the ‘inevitability’ of disease. Its in your genes there is nothing you can do.
The mainstream conventional approach treats many common ailments with antibiotics [Greek meaning anti-life] killing off bacteria almost indiscriminately on the assumption that they are causing a problem. The result is a huge reduction in the number and diversity of gut microbes. This (anti-life) approach rests on the assumption of germ theory...

There are popular ideas that are widely held that are road blocks to freedom. And, in fact, support the advancing totalitarian state. Ideas are powerful, they motivate us. The ideas that people hold as true determine their behaviour, their attitudes, what they will tolerate and what they will not, and the values they pursue.
And ideas take time to be assimilated and acted upon. There is a necessary delay between being exposed to an idea and acting upon it. This holds true for large groups, nations and civilsations as well as individuals. So by observing ideas that are widely held today, you can predict the future behaviour of individuals or entire nations to some extent.
Ideas that prevent freedom
Currently, there are a great many ideas predominantly held as true in our western culture that stand in the way of freedom – that prevent freedom, that negate the possibility of freedom. In this weeks Podcast I outline 3 of them.

Altruism is good

Altruism is the idea that self-sacrifice is good, you are your brother’s keeper. It is the idea that helping others is a moral duty. To do things for self is bad, to do things for others is good. To keep for yourself is bad, to give to others is good.
Altruism says that you do not have the right to live for your own sake, which would mean investing all of your efforts towards the success of your own life and your own happiness. Altruism says that you have a duty to the group, to the tribe, to the collective. Altruism says it is wrong to focus on self because you have a moral duty to sacrifice your values to those in greater need than you.
Altruism is the antithesis of freedom and the morality of slavery. If you are morally bound to keep giving up your values to the group or to some ‘other’ then you are not free to live the life you want. You are not able to act on your own judgment to pursue your own rational self-interest.
Altruism fosters the predisposition to give up values and is the perfect idea to underpin statism, collectivism, communism, slavery.
While this ideas is widely held as true freedom has no chance. This idea is very widely entrenched in western culture and shows no sign of going away any time soon.
Capitalism is evil
Another idea that is very widely held as true is that capitalism is the source of our economic problems and not any kind of solution. We see anti-capitalist demonstrations and we do not see pro-capitalism rallies. Capitalism is not understood by the vast majority of people and this is a testament to the triumph of propaganda over genuine education.
Most people think of fat cats, greed and exploitation when they hear the word, yet capitalism is,in fact, the solution the problem of man’s freedom. It is the only sociopolitical system that respects property rights. Capitalism holds that you own your own life, your own body and all of the results of your productive effort.
It is the only system in which a genuinely voluntary society is possible, where people would not be coerced or forced into any action against their will. Yet it does not throw out the rule of law. It is the only socioeconomic system that declares man free and supports the non-aggression principle in all human interactions. Capitalism respects your right to choose, it doesn’t force you to do anything, it allows you to act on your own judgment.
Mysticism – the idea that belief in things without reasons or evidence is OK

Mysticism is another widely held idea in western culture. again handed down from the religions and embedded into human consciousness for millennia – just like Altruism.  The implicit idea is that reasons are unnecessary. There is no need for proof, evidence logic or reason… you simply believe what you choose to believe. In fact, some mystics say that you need to believe before you can know.

When I interviewed Mark Steele about 5G on this Podcast a year ago, he made claims about it being used as a weapons system.  I recently learned from a Youtuber in Minnesota, Mc Toon (pictured left), that many of these claims are false.
In this weeks episode of the Podcast we set the record straight and have an interesting conversation about Various aerial configurations, transmission power levels, electromagnetic fields and 5G, and sort out why it is dangerous and why it is not.
MC Toon has a regular show at 8 pm Central (US) time where he debates “flat Earthers”. demolishing their flimsy and ill considered ‘arguments’ for a disc world view. He is a rational man looking for the evidence to support any claim. I am not sure if he is a de-bunker in general and a mainstream man, or whether his mind is open to considering the wider agenda. However, it is essential that we correct false claims and always be prepared to re-question any conclusions we my have formed in the light of new evidence.

Michael’s Youtube channel can be found here https://www.youtube.com/c/MCToon/videos
His website is https://mctoon.net/ and his article on the 6o GHz can be found here.
Also, in the show he referenced the ADS or Active Denial System for crowd control. You can learn about it further if you follow this link.
 
 
 
 

You are not being told the truth by your government or the mainstream media. This is an unpalatable fact that many cannot even begin to accept. If you are reading this you are one of the very few who can. This podcast is dedicated to bringing you an exploration of the agenda that you will not hear on your six O’clock news in your country.
In this week’s episode of “Living outside the Matrix” I bring you an interview with Max Igan from Australia. I wanted to check out what was happening there since the last time we spoke, and find out if things were improving or getting worse. It seems that tyranny is continuing to unfold unchecked by any serious resistance in Australia as well as here n the UK.
This episode is also published on Bitchute where you can watch the conversation if you prefer.

Please hit the like button and share. If you haven’t done so already subscribe so as to not miss out when my YouTube channel is eventually removed.
Feel free to comment below. I will do my best to get around to replying to comments.
Nigel Howitt, Treehouse Farm
July 21st, 2021
 

Why is it that some people seem incapable of independently holding convictions independently from the crowd? Why is it that facts will just bounce off these people and they seem to be un-persuadable with reason and evidence?
Group Think

‘Group think’ is the concept of following the herd in terms of what is generally ‘believed’ to be true. Rather than arriving at conclusions about the world independently it is the tendency to preferentially go with the consensus. But this is a broad concept and it is not a primary. What causes it? What lies at its root? There are several components that need to be considered in the process of answering this question which I will examine below. But first…
Here are the links that I mention in this podcast. The first is to Episode 100 with Bo Bennet on Logical Fallacies Bo Bennet wrote the book Logically Fallacious. And here is the link to my rational explanation of Emotions. Understanding emotions is so important, and yet within the Matrix it is all back to front.
You can listen to the Podcast above, or watch it on Youtube below.

Subjectivism
Subjectivism is basically the idea that reality is what ever it is said to be and that there is no objective reality existing independent of consciousness. There are three kinds of subjectivism.
1. Supernatural subjectivism: which is when the truth is whatever a deity or supernatural being says it is.
2. Collective subjectivism: which is when truth is whatever the group or society says it is.
3. Personal subjectivism which is when truth is whatever the individual believes/feels it to be.
Notably, no proof, evidence or logic are required to back up the subjecvist claims. A common example of personal subjectivism in this context is when someone cannot believe that something could be true if they personally cannot conceive of how it could be true. It is very similar to the way they can’t conceive that other people can commit some atrocity or evil that they themselves would not commit.
It is essentially a philosophical assumption in the mental operating system of people that doesn’t not correlate with reality. It can arise from a limited knowledge base which necessarily limits the capacity for understanding.
Inability to think logically
Decades of woefully inadequate education have left the vast majority of populations incapable of assessing the logical strength of arguments. In fact, the majority don’t realise the central importance of the logical argument, and have not developed an ability to follow the rational argument at all. Logical thinking is simply not practiced and not appreciated.
This has become endemic in modern post truth western culture. Facts, evidence, logic and proof are no longer relevant in the process of finding truth for far to many people. A shocking example of this is in the entire community of microbiologists and virologists who do not question the standard methods for the ‘so-called’ isolation of viruses. See the video below for more details.

Appeal to Authority and Emotions
Two key logical fallacies further support the concept of group think. Once people have no ability to follow the logical argument they are very easily fooled by logical fallacies
The delegation to authority is supremely powerful in the minds of those who are not independent thinkers, those who are not sovereign intellectually and psychologically independent. Delegation to authority is justifiable and necessary to some degree. But ultimately, responsibility must be taken for the chosen sources of information from which we get information. Then the information must be logically scrutinised. The truth seeker must never accept any claims on blind faith...

In the truth seeking community, the metaphor of ‘waking up’ is widely used to describe people who are becoming clued up, wiser, better informed, or in some way more aware. It is often used in connection with the idea that there is some kind of mass awakening going on, and implicitly, everything will be OK. But is it really a helpful metaphor? And if not, why not?
“Woke” is a related term used to denote social awareness (LGBT and Black Live Matter etc). It’s a mainstream and  ultimately meaningless term referring to those jumping aboard the latest alleged social awareness band wagon in the mainstream narrative. There is also the idea of spiritual awakening that is also implying an increase in awareness
The metaphor of “Waking Up”
When we use this metaphor it implies that someone has become (or is becoming) more aware. But what are the deeper implications of likening an increase in conscious awareness to the literal action of waking up?
The metaphor illustrates the transition from a state of complete unawareness to a state of awareness, comparing it to leaving the dream world and emerging into reality. It’s often used with an implication is that everything will be OK. Because people are waking up so the nightmare will end! We will be free, etc. etc.
It means that someone has achieved a significant increase in awareness or knowledge of reality, as indeed  they do when moving from unconscious to conscious emerging from sleep. What is really going on is that they have gained some new insight(s) that has been integrated into the sum of their existing knowledge and given them a new, more complete mental map of reality. There is always the possibility, of course, of a pretense or claim to knowledge that is really only jumping aboard an alternative band wagon, or that the information they have assimilated is not true.

But we must be careful likening the simple action of moving out of the sleep state, with the complex deliberate ongoing process of thought required for gaining the conceptual knowledge that distinguishes the new condition of increased awareness from the previous condition of less awareness.
The point I want to make is that this metaphor of waking up, particularly when extended to some kind of “mass awakening”, is unhelpful at best, and I would say counterproductive. And here’s why.
Counter productive

* It fosters an incorrect understanding of what is really happening when someone is becoming more aware.


* It undermines and dis-values the huge effort required and the considerable achievement of gaining knowledge and engaging in the process of learning.


* It’s a dead end that goes nowhere. The metaphor stops you in your tracks. Yes, there is a massive increase in awareness in moving from the sleep state to wakefulness. But it doesn’t go anywhere from there. It reaches the starting gate and goes nowhere. The process of gaining knowledge on the other hand is endlessly informing appropriate action.


* Call to inaction. By effectively over-congratulating the simple achievement of consciousness in wakefulness the metaphor implicitly turns the mere staring point of gaining knowledge (being awake) into an end game. Result! I’ve done it, I’m awake. Hence, the ‘waking up’ metaphor carries with it an implicit call to inaction.

Remember this call to inaction is implicit, unspoken, taken as read, an idea slipped into your mind without you noticing. But it makes it into your subconscious all the same. You may not know why, or be able to express your indifference to taking action, but it will be there, programmed into your mental operating system.
Can you explain your conclusions?
With any claim, the proof that it is genuine knowledge is in the logical explanation. If someone can’t explain why their claim is true then it is only a belief and cannot be cons...

There is a crisis in human thinking at the root of the alleged pandemic and the loss of freedoms across the globe. If vigilance is the price of freedom, then we can only expect our freedom to diminish. Because there is no vigilance being practiced by the populous in our culture. For the vast majority there is not even an awareness of the problem. Unconscious living dominates and freedom is taken for granted.
To make matter worse truth is discounted in modern western culture. This is the result of a philosophical trend that began with the publication of “A critique of pure reason” by Emmanuel Kant in 1776.
Jiddu Krishnamurti once said “It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society”. While I disagree with Krishnamurti on many things I agree that western culture is profoundly off the rails of reality! This is a natural and unsurprising consequence of the philosophy of Kant that has been so enthusiastically promoted since 1776. The implication of which is that knowledge of reality is impossible and that no one can really know anything. This trend must be reversed. We must return to an age of reason.
I have been studying philosophy and thinking techniques for a few years now and it is clear to me that the more I learn, the more I see that what I have come to regard as basic thinking skills (such as logical deduction and inference) are beyond the cognitive ability of large numbers of people. This will have far reaching, disturbing, and profoundly negative consequences. Below, I outline a few examples of where I see repeated failures in thinking.
1 – You can’t prove a negative and it is irrational to attempt to do so

While discussing the existence or not a something recently with a friend I was told that the… “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”. Let’s unpack this little mind bomb.
It is true that if you have no evidence of the existence of a thing, that you do not actually have any proof that it doesn’t exist. But what is going on here is an implicit attempt to prove a negative. While it is true that if you have no evidence you do not have evidence of absence, the point is that evidence of absence is impossible!
What does it mean to prove a negative? it means the attempt to ‘prove’ that something does not exist. For example, we have all heard some one say ” You can’t prove that God doesn’t exist therefore he probably does. Or the same for Proving that Unicorns don’t exist, or that Father Christmas doesn’t exist!
But it must be remembered that evidence, proof, reason, logic, only pertain to things that exist. The non-existent is nothing, the void, the zero. A non-existent thing cannot leave its mark on reality – anywhere. There can be no evidence offered in support of any claim regarding a non-existent thing.
Don’t be confused by the idea of proving you weren’t at the scene of the crime because you have an alibi. This is offering positive evidence to disprove a false claim by offering positive evidence of something. Similarly, I can offer you proof that my car isn’t red by showing you that it’s blue. This is disproving a false claim with positive evidence. The car exists and it has a colour. This is very different from attempting to prove that I don’t have a car, which would be attempting to prove a negative. What evidence could possibly be produced in support of a claim of non-existence?
The concept of proof rests the law of identity. A is A. And the concept of proof only pertains to that which exists.

In order to understand the pandemic and its implications for our freedom and ability to flourish we must bring to bear as much contextual knowledge as possible. Otherwise, our mental map of reality will not be sufficiently clear and accurate for us to make sense of events and see clearly the implications of what is happening.
To start with we must bear in mind the fact that propaganda is ubiquitous in the modern world. Edward Bernays wrote the book “Propaganda” in 1928 and the science of public relations was born. Public relations is the art of deception and therefore the manipulation of people’s behaviour. It has come a long way since the early days of last century.  You are lied to routinely by your trusted media outlets (the BBC for example) in order to pursue various agendas. The principles are the same whether you are being sold a bar of soap or a political ideology.
We must also consider the context of the widely known and published political agenda for the increased centralisation of power and global governance. We must also bear in mind its surreptitious implementation via Agenda 21. Although overtly presented as a means to combat the alleged climate emergency the implications and effects of Agenda 21 are catastrophic for political and economic freedom.

Also, consider what the World Economic Forum (W.E.F.) is saying about the great global reset! They are championing the pandemic as an excellent opportunity to ‘transform’ the world economy. It must be understood that their vision for a controlled economy is not one that will benefit you, it is one that will benefit the parasite class at the top of the pyramid of political control.
We must bear in mind the secret societies that interweave to make up the perfect implementation framework for any political agenda. Secret societies with oaths of allegiance that bind members to strict silence under pain of horrific penalties or punishments can only serve the interests of evil. Naive beliefs that they exist to help people and further the brotherhood of man must be put aside in favour of a rational and mature evaluation of the concept of secrecy within a structure perfectly designed to exclude any outside scrutiny.
Lastly, we must bear in mind that there is no proof for the fundamentals of the alleged pandemic. There is no sample of pure isolated virus anywhere on the planet. It has never been properly isolated outside of a cell culture. I refer you to the work of Dr Tom Cowan and Dr Andrew Kaufman. The point is that the whole pandemic claim has no basis in reality. It is fiction. The existence of the virus is the place to start because until that is proven all else is moot.
Won’t it all just go away?
This is widely believed by a large number of people who can only be unaware of the contextual knowledge I am drawing attention to. When you realise that a political agenda is driving the narrative and the idea of a pandemic this belief falls apart. Similarly, if one lacks awareness of the concept of propaganda and that lying is routinely practiced for political expediency by the mainstream trusted outlets like the BBC, then you will not be able to see the truth.
Also, if you lack the necessary skills in logical thinking and fail to see the importance of the fundamental proof of the existence of the virus (any virus in fact) then you will easily be deflected away from this point. But this is the ESSENTIAL point to grasp because it is at the root of the pandemic idea and therefore at the root of this and any other future pandemics!
But people are waking up, aren’t they?
Some people insist that there is some kind of great awake...

There is a growing number of people in the UK who falsely believe that the common law will somehow save them against tyranny. While there some merit in  learning about civics and precisely where we stand in our relationship to government, it’s necessary to point out the serious error in the belief that any kind of law can help against Tyranny. Remember that every step of the rise to power of both Hitler and Mussolini was entirely legal.
In this weeks podcast I am joined by Ben Lowrey. Ben is a friend who shared a similar journey some 12 years ago when we both rode a wave of optimism around common law solutions to freedom from implied contracts with the state. Back then, it was implicitly considered possible to reason with government. It was believed that if you constructed well crafted documents you could effectively dodge the jurisdictional claim of governments over men. In spite of the correctness of the thinking, and the justness of the technology, it turned out to be unfounded optimism – as Ben and I can both testify. And in the current climate we both feel that people should be warned against any false hope of technologies and techniques that could potentially get them in a lot of trouble and ultimately achieve nothing.

The enemy is deeply embedded in our society by means of it’s secret society. Many are completely unaware that we are so far down the road towards the completion of their great work that what little freedom we ordinary people have will soon be lost. It takes time for the reality of the situation to manifest, but all the key pillars are in place. The government here in the UK have demonstrated that they can do whatever they like in the context of their narrative, and the tragedy is that the vast majority have fallen obediently in line. There is no indication that this pattern will not repeat itself whatever insane narrative they come up with. Who knows? Next it will probably be an alien invasion!
I hope you enjoy this conversation that sometimes appears to be Ben interviewing Me! But the take away point is very serious. Tyranny cannot be turned back by the common law, or any legal process for that matter. It is like trying to reason with an invading army. You may be right, but you wont be listened to. It is very important to get this so that you don’t waste any money on pointless courses. And perhaps most importantly so that you don’t waste your precious time on something that hasn’t a snowball in hell’s chance of success!
Rational persuasion is all that can change minds, and then those minds need to act accordingly with widespread  civil disobedience. Nothing else will hold back the tide of tyranny but a knowledgeable population that is prepared to act. The trouble is that most minds out there can’t even recognize or hear a rational argument. The years of relentless propaganda have worked their spell on the minds of the masses.
An inescapable tsunami of communism is coming. If you can, hide in the cracks of society and hopefully your grand children will be able to emerge into freedom. Because an ‘age of reason‘ is a fundamental prerequisite for freedom, and we are a long, long way from that.
Ben can be contacted about any of his common law experiences at his Facebook Page called “thebenlowreypage“
Nigel Howitt,
Treehouse Farm
May 12th 2021

It is claimed that a merging of science and spirituality is happening, and that it is a good thing. The assumption is that this will somehow move us on to a place better than where science alone has brought us. But is this even possible? Is it not a contradiction in terms?
First we must define our terms. What is science? What is spirituality? What is truth and how do we achieve certainty? Indeed is certainty even possible? Some say that it is not.
In this weeks podcast interview with Brendan D Murphy we take a journey through the quest for knowledge and understanding, and explore what we can know and how we can know it. Two views are contrasted in their approach to scientific discovery.
What is real?
It is from the basic and self evident axioms – that existence exists and that consciousness is conscious – that we build our world view. We can know that things are what they are and that they are not what they are not, with confidence. Although this sounds like mental gymnastics or some kind of tongue twister, it is fact a logical recognition of reality. A is A. A thing is itself and it cannot be not itself at the same time. In other words contradictions cannot exist in reality.
Truth is the recognition of reality, the way things are. And in our quest to understand and know reality we can be certain of things. You can be certain that contradictions do not exist. A chair cannot be a chair and not a chair at the same time. As Ayn Rand observed; existence is identity and consciousness is identification.
It is impossible to reconcile this view with the idea that consciousness creates matter, or that nothing really exists until it is subject to some kind of process from our mind. If this were true nothing would have an objective existence, reality would be completely fluid and nothing would have any fixed identity. It would be an impossible reality inconsistent with itself. Yet this is the view of existence held by those who assert that consciousness creates reality.

Science and spirituality
Brendan D Murphy is a spiritual seeker with a perspective at odds to my own. He has written a book called “The Grand Illusion” which speaks of a union of science and spirituality.  This conversation is an attempt to establish a standard of truth that can be relied upon to deliver knowledge, with certainty beyond a reasonable doubt. We definitely have some common ground, but we differ on the fundamental issue of primacy of consciousness versus primacy of existence. I cannot see how there can be a concept of truth without an fixed objective reality existing independent of any consciousness whether human, divine, or both. Reality serves as the final court of appeal in any dispute between men. Without reality as the standard of truth, negotiation and persuasion would be impossible.
Definitions
At the outset I was keen to establish definitions of spirituality and science. I hold that spirituality simply refers to consciousness. My spirit is my consciousness. But for Brendan it was a little harder to pin down. In essence we agreed that science is more about a method of rational and logical thinking as opposed to any particular body of claimed knowledge. We agreed that in ‘genuine science’ any and all information or claims of knowledge should remain open to re-examination, and to new questions in the light of new evidence.
By my definition of spirituality the union of science and  spirituality is possible, but for Brendan’s I remain unconvinced that it is. It must be remembered that genuine science is  a quest to know what is real, what happens, and why. It must follow a scrupulously logic method isolating variables and establishing causal relationships between entities. If nothing exists independent of our consciousness, and our consciousness can shape the outcome of the experiment, then we could indeed know nothing.

One of the most widespread and enduring myths in recent history is the idea that man has left the earths atmosphere with the specific rocket propulsion technology claimed by NASA. But if we put on our detective hats and look to the fundamentals we can deduce (and know) that this idea is false. This has nothing to do with any nonsense about a flat earth, and I am not stating that space travel is impossible. The point here is that the claims of NASA are demonstrably false.
The crux of the issue is the claim that rocket propulsion as advocated by NASA has the capability to exert a force in the vacuum of space. A common error in understanding confuses the facts of the free expansion of gases with Newtons 3rd law of dynamics. The first of these assumes that gases expanding freely in a vacuum can exert a force on the rocket to move it forward. The second in the conservation of momentum (or recoil effect) in which the mass ejected in one direction will result in a force exerted in the opposite direction.
It’s not Rocket Science
Note that the phrase “It’s not rocket science” is widely used in western culture. It is taken to mean that something is understandable. The implication is that rocket science is not understandable – and it isn’t. But probably not on account of its conceptual complexity, but rather it’s basic fraud.

In this weeks podcast I am joined by Patrik Holmqvist and Simon Shack to examine the many claims of NASA that all rest on the this fundamental issue and are necessarily false if the theory is dis-proven. Patrik is a researcher and rational thinker with a background in IT. Simon Shack is a researcher and author of the book “The Tychos – our Ge-oaxial binary system”. Simon has conducted many years of research and created the Clues Forum at cluesforum.info which is a fantastic resource for any investigator looking to gather all the evidence in order to bust myths such as this, 9/11 and the pandemic hoax.
The three of us have previously discussed another topic that is central to the great deception. It is the model of our solar system. We are all taught that the Earth is a part of a helio-centric solar system centred on the Sun. But the evidence contradicts this claim and fully supports an alternative historical model first conceived by Swedish Astronomer Tycho Brahe and modified in the light of all recent observational data by Simon Shack. This topic is closely related to the issue of space travel by conventional rocket propulsion technology. You can check it out here.
For those who wish examine Newtons third law to further understand the decepetion you may want to check out the video below…

For those looking for further reading there is a book called “We never went to the moon” by Bill Kaysing that is worth a read. Plus, Simon’s well written book called “The TYCHOS – Our Geo-axial Binary System” which is available from his Website tychos.info.
Please feel free to join the conversation – as long as your not a flat-earther! I reject the ludicrous idea that the earth is flat and do not wish to enter into any distracting debate about that topic. I am personally satisfied that ALL the evidence available supports the conviction that the Earth is a sphere. Please do not pollute the subject by commenting about any flat earth theory. Anyone who believes this nonsense has either been duped by a psychological operation to muddy the waters of serious rational debate, or they are part of that psychological operation.

For many years now there have been a growing number of Doctors questioning the mainstream medical paradigm and the allopathic model of health care. This mainstream paradigm views the world as dangerous and full of pathogens that ‘threaten’ human health. It is a kind of military model where the body is considered to be continually under threat of invasion from the outside. The allopathic health care model simply treats symptoms with drugs never really asking the fundamental question “why is this person sick in this way?”
There are a growing number of labels for alternative health practices, such as alternative medicine, functional medicine, holistic medicine, integrative medicine, etc. All of these share the characteristic of following an alternative set of principles and seeing health in a different way. The fundamental cornerstone of the mainstream medical paradigm with its military view is the concept of contagion. This concept also known as germ theory, is sadly also shared by many of the alternative practices.
My guest on this weeks podcast is a man called Adrian who has spent the past several years studying health and wellness and who follows his own set of alternative principles for health, and what I love about him is that he doesn’t accept the idea of contagion. He asks fundamental questions and has exploded many of the myths of modern medicine. Adrian has published a book called ‘Alternative Principles for Health‘ and it has an interesting twist. When you get a copy it doesn’t ever go out-of-date because Adrian keeps updating it as he learns more.

In this weeks Podcast Adrian tells me about his journey of discovery into health and along the way we discuss a whole range of topics. The myth of contagion is just one of the controversial topics we touch on. And here at lawfulrebel.com we are no stranger to controversy for one simple reason. To discern the truth you have to listen to all the arguments for competing stories/explanations and evaluate their logical strength and consistency with the rest of your carefully
Check out Adrian’s website fortheloveoftruth.co.uk  where you can find his podcasts and a whole lot of information on health. Also you can check out his book at alternativeprinciplesforhealth.info.
Adrian can also be followed on these social media platforms.
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyIhHTLqM1noQbdFuX45EaA
lbry: https://lbry.tv/@adrianr:8
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@adrianr:8
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/BN35jpJIyixx/
Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/adrianr
I hope you enjoy the podcast and please feel free to join the conversation and leave a comment.
Nigel Howitt, Treehouse Farm,
March 3rd 2021

Modern education has abandoned us – by design. Many young people are now functionally illiterate and they have no clue how to spot an argument or construct one. The basic rules of organizing one’s mind and of reasoning with logic is beyond the capability of most grown up people today. DON’T BE ONE OF THEM! The discussion in this weeks podcast will fill you in on a few of the basics, but most importantly point you to an invaluable resource for your own self education.
Dr David Kelley has written a fantastic book that I consider to be one of the best if not THE best book on how to think. “The Art of Reasoning – An Introduction to Logic” is co-written with Debby Hutchins in its fifth edition. In the style of a textbook, this book takes you through all the basics of reasoning. It is laid out well in three sections and offers all sorts of exercises and practical applications of the things you will learn.
In the Interview David and I discuss many of the aspects of reasoning that are most important to the truth seeker today. Check it out on the podcast or you can watch the YouTube video below. Please remember to subscribe to my Bitchute Channel as well as my YouTube channel will not be tolerated for much longer.

The book is on Amazon here. Below are affiliate links. Also you can pick up a copy of David’s pamphlet “7 Habits of highly objective people” too. I am not generally in the business of pushing and selling books and products, but these are very recommended because of the MASSIVE boost to your thinking skills that these books will provide.
The Art of Reasoning For the UK only
7 Habits of highly Objective People for the UK only
Sorry US buyers. I have been having trouble with my US account because it doesn’t get used enough 🙁
       
I hope you find this podcast valuable. Please feel free to join the conversation and comment below. If you are interested in how these thinking skills translate into everyday examples of the principles discussed, check out my ongoing series “A Truth Seekers Guide” below.

Nigel Howitt
Treehouse Farm, January 20th 2021

There are a great many threats to your health these days but are viruses one of them? There is an almost complacent popular belief that lifespans just keep increasing but is this true? While the list of modern chronic diseases grows and the numbers suffering from them grow exponentially few people are asking the root cause question… What really makes you ill?
Your GP or medical doctor is clearly not interested in the cause of illness. His medical training has only shown him how to treat symptoms. This is not a rational approach that tells us anything about how to pursue optimal health by avoiding that which compromises it.  Thankfully more and more people are becoming aware of this fundamental flaw in modern medicine and the implicit assumptions it contains.
In this weeks podcast Dawn Lester and David Parker address the root cause questions of why people get sick. They dare to ask the question that medical Doctors and General Practitioners avoid – what really makes you ill?

What really Make you ill?
In there fabulous and comprehensive book Dawn and David distinguish between illness and disease. They also propose that there are essentially 4 categories for the cause of illness. It is a lengthy piece of work running to well over 700 pages, and it took them 10 years to research and write.

Never before has it been more important to know WHAT REALLY MAKES US ILL. These days viruses are touted as the cause of COVID-19 even though there is plenty of evidence that contradicts the theory of contagion and zero evidence linking a specific virus with any symptoms. We live in a context where health is a political issue used to control populations and yet where increasing levels of EMFs, environmental toxins and poor quality food and water are all ignored as health problems. This is a must know topic and a very interesting subject.
You can pick up a copy of the book at all major book stores and of course on Amazon.
Visit their website for more information at whatreallymakesyouill.com
Check out my 12 strategies for optimal health more a comprehensive look at how to be healthy.
Nigel Howitt, Treehouse Farm
December 28th, 2020

We have all been raised with the heliocentric model of our solar system as fact. We all assume that it represents the way our solar system works. But what if you knew that there are several awkward observations that do not fit this model? What if you found out that there is empirical evidence that falsifies this almost universally accepted model? Would you be prepared to reconsider your lifelong belief in this claim?
If it is the truth you seek your answer to that question should be, yes. Because any good detective must always be open to new evidence that contradicts his current theory. And the TYCHOS model discussed in this week’s Podcast interview with researchers Simon Shack and Patrik Holmqvist, does precisely this. It contradicts and therefore falsifies the current heliocentric model.
Today what passes as ‘science’ is more like a religion – scientism. The astute observer will notice a pattern in which awkward evidence that contradicts and therefore falsifies a current theory is simply ignored for political expediency. Assumptions are clung to in the face of evidence that disproves them. This is so widespread it can sadly be regarded as normal in mainstream “science” – the kind trumpeted by political leaders and informs their policies. For example, the evidence that contradicts the theory of infectious disease is ignored while freedom is destroyed in the name of an alleged pandemic.  Evidence of other genuine causes of illness is routinely ignored. Evidence that shows beyond a reasonable doubt that events such as 9/11 and 7/7 could not have happened as claimed by the official narrative is also ignored. The facts of reality are also contradicted by the claims of a “climate emergency”. I could go on.
But if you consider yourself a truth seeker you will appreciate the importance of the genuine scientific method, the real deal, the proper process. If you are a thinker you will understand that first the facts of reality must be observed. Then, and only then, can a theory or hypothesis be offered that fits the observed data. Once a theory appears to fit the empirical evidence attempts must be made to falsify it. It must be examined critically with genuine and honest attempts to pick it apart and find fault with it. If it cannot be falsified it becomes increasingly likely to be true.
It must also be noted that it is one thing to falsify the current model of the solar system and to present another one that accommodates the observational data, but an entirely different thing to be able to explain how the alternative model works. That would rightly constitute the next phase of enquiry in the genuine scientific method. This TYCHOS model is one that accommodates all of the evidence and contradicts none of it. It does not claim to have all the answers. It does not claim to have all the explanations for what we see, it does claim to present a model that accommodates everything we see.  The inability to explain how a new model works does not invalidate the falsification of a competing model.
The Tychos model in a nutshell
The Tychos model is a binary system with the Sun and Mars being the primary pair of heavenly bodies. Significantly the Sun revolves around the earth, while all the other planets revolve around the Sun. Meanwhile, the Earth rotates about its axis and revolves around its own smaller orbit with an outward tilt of 23 degrees. This slow orbit (with a speed of 1.6 Kph) takes nearly 26,000 years to complete.
Note that there are about a dozen phenomena that astronomers have grappled with for centuries that cannot be explained by the heliocentric model. In episode 123 of the Podcast, Simon and Patrik only have time to touch on 3 of them. However, the Tychos model accommodates all of these phenomena and accounts for all of the observational data. As rational truth-seekers and detectives,

Germ theory is the foundation stone of the current pandemic. It is the fundamental assumption at the beginning of the chain of reasoning that hs resulted in worldwide lockdowns stripping people of their rights across the globe.  All around the world livelihoods and careers are being destroyed by the actions of governments forcefully restricting trade. Lives are being hampered and disrupted. Loved ones separated and dying parents prevented from seeing their relatives. Basic human rights and freedom of movement are being sacrificed on this unproven assumption.
It is truly staggering that such widespread action can be taken with such massive implications for the whole of western civilisation on a premise that is contradicted by the facts. Not only is there no evidence of the existence of the coronavirus (as we shall see), but the facts often contradict the assertion that what has been called  SARS-COV-2 is responsible for a particular set of respiratory symptoms. You now live in a world where the policies of governments across the world act in unison regardless of the facts of reality. Repeated assertions and proclamations have taken the place of rational enquiry and legitimate scientific method.
The myth holds that microbes in the form of bacteria and/or viruses are the microscopic agents of disease and that they are responsible for the transmission of disease from one person to another. It is an understandable conclusion to draw only if you rush to judgment and blind yourself to all of the available facts. Many examples contradict the idea.  When the crew of early sailing ships were all observed to suffer from scurvy it was assumed they were passing it from one person to another, when in fact it was a deficiency in Vitamin C that was to blame. Many people getting sick at one time and place in Hiroshima was also clearly not a case of contagion.

Most people cannot accept that so many “official” agencies along with so many medical organisations and doctors could all be wrong. It takes an unusual level of intellectual independence to trust one’s own judgment of the facts or reality above those of perceived ‘authorities’. The majority do not know how to think for themselves and have either lost the ability or never acquired it. They are terrified at the thought of relying on their own cognitive skills. But facts remain facts irrespective of how many people acknowledge them. And ultimately reality will assert itself over those who ignore it, or reinvent it or reshape it according to their convenience or political expediency.
In this week’s Podcast, it is a great pleasure to welcome back Dr Tomas Cowan and also Sally Fallon Morell, both of whom have guested on the show previously. This summer hey co-authored a book that presents a timely challenge to the almost universal myth of contagion. I was impressed with the use of evidence, reason and logic to illustrate clearly the irrational presentation of so-called evidence to support the declared pandemic.
They do not deny the existence of an illness called COVID-19, but they point to overwhelming evidence that suggests causes other than a wily virus. The book explores the concept of resonance and also the effects of electricity on health over the centuries in the form of radiation from comets, through the advent of radio to the present bombardment of wifi Bluetooth and SMART phones. EMFs are cited as well documented causes of chronic illness alongside diet and other lifestyle factors. It is suggested that 5G should at the very least be properly investigated for its role in the cause of illness with Hypoxia as a key symptom.

“The Contagion Myth” is a great book. It is easily readable and packed with thought-provoking information and factual references. I thoroughly recommend it.
To keep up with the ongoing conversation both Dr Cowan and Sally write regular blogs.

The current mainstream understanding of the achievement of health and prevention of disease needs a radical update to bring it in line with the facts of reality. The alleged coronavirus pandemic is an opportunity for this, but there is no guarantee that it will happen. Kate Shemirani and Dr Kevin Corbett are both ex-nurses with considerable experience in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Their evidence-based approach has led them to question the official narrative and arrive at conclusions that contradict it.
The Medical Revolutionaries
Kate Shemirani and Dr Kevin Corbett are both outspoken critics of the official “advice” in dealing with the alleged pandemic and they openly criticise the fundamental lack of evidence in support of the draconian measures being enforced on the British people. They have joined forces to work together under the tag line “The Medical revolutionaries” and it is clear to all thinking people who question the official narrative on health issues that modern medicine desperately needs a revolution. The surge in interest in gut health in recent years reflects the breakthroughs in crucial insights and knowledge that have made little impact in the mainstream.

The current allopathic model is not working as epidemics of chronic inflammation and chronic disease continue to cause widespread suffering to humanity irrespective of and prior to any claims of the impact of COVID-19. The real health threats go un-acknowledged while the bogus health threat of a viral pandemic is used to usher in a political agenda.
In this week’s Podcast, Kate Shemirani and Dr Kevin Corbett share their knowledge and perspectives on a wide range of related issues around the alleged pandemic and what needs to be done. Having considerable experience from the AIDS pandemic that was supposed to kill us all in the 1980s, Kevin saw a familiar pattern with the current flawed testing regime using the PCR tests. Kate Shemirani has considerable knowledge of alternative therapies as well as the harm done by vaccines. Together they offer wide-ranging insights into “operation Coronavirus”.
Further information
Kate Shemirani has been deleted from most social media platforms. But she and Kevin can be followed on a variety of platforms under the new banner of “The Medical Revolutionaries”. These include Bitchute, Youtube, Brighteon, LRBY, Parler, etc.
Dr Kevin Corbett has a websitekevinpcorbett.com where you can find his “anti coronavirus tool kit”. You can also follow him on Twitter at KPCresearch.
Here are links to two articles written by Dr Corbett.
The PDF for this article “Where is the proof of the existence of the “Novel Coronavirus” ‘SARS COV-2’ and the accuracy of the tests” can be downloaded here.
And you can read another article by Dr Corbett called ” The Nazification of the National Health Service” here.
 

There are many issues to unpack as you investigate the health fraud of the current false pandemic. The many failings of the RT-PCR Test and the unknown fragments of RNA it identifies are one component, along with the suspicious match of one of the primer sequences with the human Chromosome 8. Amandha Dawn Vollmer is familiar with all of these. But perhaps most importantly she has a firm grasp of the unproven myth of contagion. Otherwise known as ‘germ theory’ or the ‘theory of infectious disease’.
The belief that small microbes that move around in the environment are dangerous agents of disease has been with us since the days of Louis Pasteur about 140 years. But his claims have been shown to be fraudulent and un-proven from his own diaries. His ‘Germ Theory’ model of disease causation fits with superficial glances at how disease occurs and that numbers of people in one place often become sick together, but it doesn’t take a proper scientifically literate view of all the facts. It is a typical rush to judgment that confuses correlation with causation.
In this week’s Podcast Interview Amandha exposes many of the facets of this fraud from the perspective of a holistic health practitioner with a markedly different set of values from your mainstream doctor. Amandha is very knowledgeable and brings considerable experience to bear in her analysis of the current situation.
She begins by laying out her fundamental values and the holistic approach to health and disease. This is an essential foundation from which to understand the fraudulent nature of the current mainstream narrative. I am sure you will find this conversation enlightening and entertaining if you are a committed truth seeker like me.

Further information
You can learn more from Amandha and all the amazing products she makes and sells by visiting her websites:
You can follow her blog and check out the resources mentioned in the video here https://yummy.doctor/blog/
And check out her amazing products here at her online shop https://yumnaturals.com/
Amandha’s Youtube Channel is Yum Naturals and can be found here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwOl8BHaN9Y3lZbzvkviGLQ
I will be talking with Amandha again soon and we shall discuss many of the forgotten and censored health-supporting products such as DMSO and Chlorine Dioxide.
Nigel Howitt, Treehouse Farm
October 28th 2020

Michael O’ Bernicia is a popular freedom-fighter, writer and mystic who I first heard about during the ‘freeman’ movement of just over a decade ago. He claims to have a solution to the tyranny being imposed on the people of the British Isles. He says that the answer to COVID-1984 is Magna Carta 2020. But what does that mean? What is his common-law solution?
Michael is a Geordie from the northeast of England who began his career as a stand-up comic. He went on to teach stand-up comedy, wrote two plays and made a couple of short films including “The Great Mortgage Swindle” which is linked to below.

In this week’s podcast, I asked him about his common-law solution. He explained the common-law and his strategy and I think you will find it very interesting. He is very confident that it will work. Have a listen and decide for yourself.

To find out more about the ‘Bernician’ and what he is up to check out these links below, all mentioned in the podcast.

* https://www.thebernician.net
* https://twitter.com/thebernician
* https://www.facebook.com/michael.obernicia
* https://www.thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.net
* https://roguemale.org/

There are other solutions proposed to the tyranny that is being imposed on us. You can learn more in this interview with Darren Deogee who discusses other legal solutions and challenges.
I do not consider Simon Dolan’s “Keep Britain Free” bandwagon a credible one. He repeatedly avoids being interviewed and exposing his strategy to the scrutiny of his peers and other thinking people. I do not recommend joining in on crowdfunding a mission that does not reveal its fundamental principles or philosophical direction.
Generally speaking, here in the UK there is remarkably little resistance to the encroaching tyranny. There is certainly nothing remotely as widespread, organised and well-coordinated as the mainstream false narrative.
Things you can do

The most constructive thing you can do to resist the increasing loss of your freedom is to NOT comply. Refuse to wear a mask. You don’t have to say this verbally. It is ok to just tell people that you are “exempt” and leave it at that. or you can say that you suffer from severe asthma or anxiety. If I were to put on a mask I would suffer from severe anxiety, because by my actions I would have given in to tyranny!
Protest. Get out there and join the marches. Soon you won’t be able to. Soon the time will come when it becomes a sensible matter of self-preservation to wear a mask and to make yourself anonymous, to hide and not get arrested, forcibly vaccinated and/or detained/quarantined. Soon the rational survival strategy will be to keep your head down, to hide away and cease to participate in mainstream society in any meaningful way. That time is not yet here, but it will be upon us soon. Maybe in months, or weeks or a few years?
Avoid listening to the mainstream propaganda, or at the very least counterbalance it by listening to people like James Corbett of theCorbett Report. He is one of the best rational genuine news sources left on...

In this week’s Podcast, it is a great pleasure to welcome back Nora Gedgaudas. Nora is a board-certified nutritional consultant with a practice in Portland Oregon, USA. She is widely regarded as an expert on the paleo diet having penned the best selling book “Primal Body – Primal Mind”. She is a leading expert and educator on the benefits of metabolic flexibility and a high-fat diet.
She has spent a considerable number of hours authoring a ‘COVID-19 Special Report’ which she is offering for free on her website, and she shares some of the key points in this discussion. She recommends a full dietary intervention plan to really take control of your health and the details of this are contained in her ‘primalgenic’ dietary plan which you can access via the link below.
Nora Has written extensively of the benefits of being metabolically flexible and well adapted to burning fat as your primary fuel. She holds that being in a well-adapted state of nutritional ketosis offers numerous health benefits as well as creating a hostile environment for any alleged ‘viral’ threat. You can eliminate any of those ‘co-factors’ that undermine your immune system with this approach.
However, top of the list of her advice for better health – at zero cost – is to simply avoid the mainstream media with all its relentless fear-mongering. She cites an article in the Guardian newspaper that can be read here that references a study showing the scientifically proven effects of relentless mainstream news.

Further information
previous Episodes of Living outside the Matrix featuring Nora Gedgaudas include:

* Ep 27 “The benefits of a high-fat diet“
* EP 84 “Do’s and Don’ts on a high-fat diet“

More information
Visit Nora’s websites

* primalbody-primalmind.com
* primalcourses.com
* www.primalgenic.com

If you use coupon code: MATRIX2020 (case sensitive) throughout the rest of September you can get a 30% discount.

The connection between oral health and overall body health is often overlooked and under-appreciated. For this reason holistic dentistry, as practised by Dr Elmar Jung, could be the missing link in your search for health. Many modern chronic diseases have their origin in the mouths of sufferers and the underlying cause of disease can sometimes remain undetected for decades.
For most people, dentistry and general health are not connected. But this is illogical. Why should one part of your body remain exempt from the overall picture? Our teeth are often the source of chronic inflammation, a widely acknowledged cause of chronic disease, so it follows that we should check our oral health in any investigation into the source of chronic disease.
Holistic Dentistry – whole-body health
If you are rationally concerned to pursue optimal health, or if you suffer from chronic disease, holistic dentistry is something you need to know about. Although there is currently no governing body for this profession and no unifying definition, it’s an approach that takes into account the whole person, and in this respect, it is way ahead of conventional dentistry. In the quest for health and the avoidance of disease, this is the only approach that makes sense.

Dr Elmar Jung is one of the leading experts in holistic dentistry here in the UK and practices at his clinic in Southampton. Dr Jung has state of the art equipment including the CAVITAU scanner that can detect hidden infections within the jaw bone without any invasive procedure and none of the harm associated with x-rays.
Crucial health-preserving information

In this interview, he discusses the many ways in which modern toxic dentistry can negatively affect your health and the solutions that are available. There are many aspects of dental health that so many people are unaware of and yet are very likely a significant contributory factor in the ill-health.
The thinking man or woman should have no root canals or amalgam fillings in their jaw. They should also be mindful of the possibility of focal infections remaining hidden in the jaw for years after a wisdom tooth extraction. Without cleaning the wound out thoroughly bacterial infections can persist for decades delivering a constant stream of toxicity into the body that un-necessarily loads the immune system and reduces your potential for optimal health.
At his clinic in Southampton, UK, Dr  Jung offers a comprehensive list of treatments, including the safe removal of amalgam fillings and root canal treated teeth. He offers a comprehensive all-round approach to optimal health. His book “Shut your mouth and open wide” is a great read and a concise summary of his approach. See the link below.
Further details:
You can find out more from Dr Jung by visiting his website here.
And you can get a copy of his excellent book “Shut Your Mouth and Open Wide” here.
To get a copy of “The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life” by Arthur Firstenberg go here.
To check out Dr Jung’s podcast go here.
If you are interested in the Berkey water filters visit their website here.
Conclusion
As a thinker, I hold my optimal health as a key value in my life and I recommend you do the same. This means it is necessary to know about how your mouth affects your health.

Max Igan refers to the current alleged pandemic as a global IQ test and he gives good reasons for this humorous observation. He is a truth-seeker from down under and currently lives in Queensland, Australia. Having spent a lot of his life as a travelling musician, Max now spends most of his time on his radio show and video presentations.
In this week’s podcast episode, Max shared with me his perspective on the current global Coronavirus madness, and it was a refreshing antidote to the propaganda that I hear on the BBC. His main Youtube Channel was taken down recently with no warning, but he has a backup channel that I have provided a link to below.

You can listen to the conversation in this window at the top of the page or watch it directly above on Youtube (while it stays up). Alternatively, check out this episode and all of the “Living outside the Matrix” podcats on iTunes by following the link at the top of the sidebar to the right.
More information
Max’s Bitchute channel can be found here.
Max’s website, the crowhouse.com can be found here.
Max’s back up Youtube channel is called the Crowhouse and can be found here.
Nigel Howitt
Treehouse Farm
August 26th 2020